|General | Proposals | Projects | Featured books||General | Technical | Administrative||Deletion | Undeletion | Import | Permissions|
Welcome to the General reading room. On this page, Wikibookians are free to talk about the Wikibooks project in general. For proposals for improving Wikibooks, see the Proposals reading room.
RFC affecting WikiBooks on MetaWikiEdit
Hello! I've started an RFC on MetaWiki about what I see as overlap between Wikiverity and Wikibooks, specifically in the area of foreign language learning, where there are virtually identical resources (with lessons, exercises, etc.) on both platforms. I wanted to post here to get feedback from those with more experience/investment in Wikibooks. Link is below:
Editing news 2020 #2Edit
20:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback on movement namesEdit
Hello. Apologies if you are not reading this message in your native language. Please help translate to your language if necessary. Thank you!
There are a lot of conversations happening about the future of our movement names. We hope that you are part of these discussions and that your community is represented.
Our goal in this call for feedback is to hear from across the community, so we encourage you to participate in the survey, the open letter, or both. The survey will go through 7 July in all timezones. Input from the survey and discussions will be analyzed and published on Meta-Wiki.
Thanks for thinking about the future of the movement, --The Brand Project team, 19:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Note: The survey is conducted via a third-party service, which may subject it to additional terms. For more information on privacy and data-handling, see the survey privacy statement.
Editing news 2020 #3Edit
12:55, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Announcing a new wiki project! Welcome, Abstract WikipediaEdit
Sent by m:User:Elitre (WMF) 19:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC) - m:Special:MyLanguage/Abstract Wikipedia/July 2020 announcement
- A fundamentally flawed premise, the same conceptual blunder as Wikidata: imagining that knowledge is limited to what can be lined up in neat formulas. Such a representation either fails to satisfy people because it cannot capture understanding, or it succeeds in satisfying people by getting them to abandon understanding. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 20:46, 9 July 2020 (UTC)