Wikibooks:Collaboration of the Month/March 2006 voting

Voting Rules

edit

The following are the rules and conditions for voting for the Collaboration of the Month:

  1. Only registered users with 20 or more edits to their name may vote.
  2. You may vote under as many nominations as you wish, however, you may only vote for each book itself once.
  3. Sign your vote with a number sign and four tildes, #~~~~, after the most previous vote under the book's nomination. Unsigned votes will be removed.
  4. Any nomination which receives 3 or more votes in one month will automatically be renominated the next month if it is not chosen.
  5. If you wish to include a short comment for your vote, then you may do so. Make sure that if you leave such a comment, that you are also voting for that page.
  6. Do not post objection votes as these will have no effect on the final tally.
  7. Voting will end at 00:00 UTC on the first day of each month. In essence, when a new month begins voting ends. Any votes added after this time will be discarded.
  8. The nomination with most votes will be chosen as the Collaboration of the Month. In case of a tie, the older Wikibook will be chosen.

Nominations

edit
  1. --Kyriakos 22:37, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Rob Horning 03:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Klingoncowboy4 17:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(renominated with 4 votes for February)

  1. Mastermind 007 11:47, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

(renominated with 3 votes for February)

  1. Mastermind 007HQMissions done14:28, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Vikram Vaka 09:43, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(renominated with 4 votes for February)

  1. Mastermind 007 19:25, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  2. Konstable 02:57, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Wisnodew 21:47, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(renominated with 5 votes for February)

128.125.99.83 20:04, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  1. I was also the vote above, but I wasn't logged in. JMRyan 20:06, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(renominated with 3 votes for February)

  1. Whiteknight (talk) (current) 03:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Rob Horning 17:12, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Klingoncowboy4 04:22, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. JMRyan 20:07, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  1. --Vanka5 05:27, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Shdwninja8 05:20, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commments

  • I oppose this nomination. Whole book is very much stub-like, book structure is not ready. Besides, how many of us can afford buying 3D Studio Max? I think we better conctentrate on more popular topics. --Derbeth talk 09:08, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Might become a good book. --Derbeth talk 10:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. DSYoungEsq 13:47, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Konstable 02:57, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. JMRyan 20:08, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Mastermind 007 12:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
  6. Rob Horning 03:34, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • This would be a classically good book for collaboration. It is a subject of which many people have knowledge, it is a basic subject on which we should have a top-quality text, and it isn't just some stub hoping to be a book some day. It also has the advantage that it isn't being simultaneously nominated as Book of the Month, which situation I never understand. DSYoungEsq 13:50, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  1. CherryT 00:45, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Dolive35 16:16, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:-

— Excuse me, but where are the votes? There is no winner without a vote. Mastermind 007 12:57, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I vote unregistered users cannot vote

  1. Mastermind 007HQMissions done14:26, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Mastermind 007HQMissions done12:13, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]