Interaction within International Law
Author: Adamantia Rachovitsa
Work in ProgressThis text is being created by OpenRewi and is not yet finished. Comments and remarks are welcome as soon as this box is gone. Feedback can also be emailed directly to the person responsible for the text.
Required knowledge: Link
Learning objectives: Understanding XY.
This is where the text begins. This template follows our style guide. Please take into account our guidelines for didactics. If you're wondering how to create text in Wikibooks, feel free to check out our guide on how to write in Wikibooks.
This is your advanced content. You can create this text box using our template "Advanced". How to do this is described here.
Example for to example topic: This is your example.
Test your knowledge in our learning area.
Just replace the content above and below with your content.
I. The Expanding Scope of International Law and the Multiplication of (semi-)Judicial BodiesEdit
II. The Relevance and Applicability of Different Rules and Areas of International Law to a DisputeEdit
III. Adjudicative Constraints: Jurisdiction and Applicable Law Before International CourtsEdit
B. Interactions between Rules of International LawEdit
I. Interaction between General Law and Special LawEdit
II. Interaction between Successive RulesEdit
III. Hierarchy of RulesEdit
IV. Interaction by Way of InterpretationEdit
C. Interactions between International CourtsEdit
I. Rules on Overlapping or Concurrent Jurisdiction of Different Courts Over the Same DisputeEdit
II. Similar Legal Questions Decided by Different CourtsEdit
III. Litigation Strategies: Choice in Forum and "Slicing" a DisputeEdit
IV. The Possibility of Contradictory Judgments or Conflicting InterpretationsEdit
V. Judicial DialogueEdit
D. Productive Friction in International LawEdit
I. How the Specialised Areas and the General Part of International Law Constantly Inform One AnotherEdit
II. The Contribution of All International Courts to the Construction of International LawEdit
III. Different Interpretations of International Rules as Progressive Development of International LawEdit
E. The Anxiety of (not) Addressing Legal IncoherenceEdit
I. Legal Incoherence as an Intrinsic Feature in Regime BuildingEdit
II. Legal Incoherence and Choice in Forum as Policy ChoicesEdit
III. The Role of International Courts in Addressing Legal IncoherenceEdit
IV. Implications of Legal Incoherence for StatesEdit
1. Business as UsualEdit
2. State ResponsibilityEdit
4. Back to the Drawing Board and Law-makingEdit
- Source I
- Source II
- Summary I
- Summary II