Work in ProgressThis text is being created by OpenRewi and is not yet finished. Comments and remarks are welcome as soon as this box is gone. Feedback can also be emailed directly to the person responsible for the text.
Author: Jane Doe
Required knowledge: Link
Learning objectives: Understanding XY.
This is where the text begins. This template follows our style guide. Please take into account our guidelines for didactics. If you're wondering how to create text in Wikibooks, feel free to check out our guide on how to write in Wikibooks.
This is your advanced content. You can create this text box using our template "Advanced". How to do this is described here.
Example for example topic: This is your example.
Just replace the content above and below with your content.
A. Positivism as Method and IdeologyEdit
I. An International Legal History of PositivismEdit
1. Early Natural Law Thinkers and the Positivist TurnEdit
2. Lassa Oppenheim on the 'Science' of International LawEdit
3. Hans Kelsen and the Pure Theory of (International) LawEdit
4. HLA Hart and International LawEdit
2. Legal Positivism within Legal PhilosophyEdit
1. The Separation ThesisEdit
2. Legal Validity and the Sources of LawEdit
3. 'Conceptual' and 'Normative' PositivismEdit
4. State Consent and Legal PositivismEdit
B. Critiques of Positivism in International LawEdit
I. Natural Law TheoryEdit
1. Natural Law and the Nature of (International) LawEdit
2. Hersch Lauterpacht and the 'Grotian Tradition'Edit
1. Anti-Positivism and the Grounds of LawEdit
2. Moral Reasons the 'Rational Reconstruction' of International LawEdit
3. Critical Approaches and Non-State LawEdit
1. Critical Legal Theory and Positivism as an Ideological ChoiceEdit
2. Legal Pluralism, Global Administrative Law, and Positivism's Statist AssumptionsEdit
- Source I
- Source II
- Summary I
- Summary II
- The first footnote. Please adhere to OSCOLA when formating citations. Whenever possible, provide a link with the citation, ideally to an open-access source.