Mathematical Proof/Introduction to Set Theory

Objects known as sets are often used in mathematics, and there exists set theory which studies them. Although set theory can be discussed formally [1], it is not necessary for us to have such a formal discussion in this book, and we may not be interested in and understand the formal discussion in this stage.

Even if we do not discuss set theory formally, it is important for us to understand some basic concepts about sets, which will be covered in this chapter.

What is a set?

edit

A set may be viewed as a collection of well-defined, distinct objects (the objects can also be sets). Because of the vagueness of the term "well-defined", we do not regard this as the definition of set. Instead, we regard set as a primitive notion (i.e., concepts not defined in terms of previously-defined concepts). Other examples of primitive notions in mathematics include point and line.

We have mentioned that a set is a collection of well-defined, distinct objects. Objects in a set are called elements of the set. We write   to mean that the element   belongs to the set  . If   does not belong to  , we write  .

Example.

  • Consider the set of all even numbers  . Elements of   include (but are not limited to) -2, 0, and 4, i.e.,  .
  • The elements of the English alphabet (a set) are English letters.


Ways of describing a set

edit

There are multiple ways to describe a set precisely (in the sense that element(s) belonging to the set is (are) known precisely).

If a set consists of a small number of elements, then the listing method may be quite efficient. In the listing method, elements of a set are listed within a pair of braces ({}). In particular, just changing the listing order of elements does not change the set represented. For example,   and   are both representing the same set whose elements are 1 and 2. If the elements listed in the pair of braces are the same, the notations created by the listing method with different listing orders refer to the same set. Also, repeatedly listing a specific element in a set does not change the set represented. For example,   and   are both representing the same set whose elements are 1 and 2. In particular, if a set contains no elements, it can be denoted by   based on the listing method or  . This kind of set is called an empty set.

Another way to describe a set is using words. For example, consider the set   of prime numbers less than 10. If we use the listing method instead, the set   is represented by  .

The third way to describe a set is advantageous when a set contains many elements. This method is called set-builder notation. There are three parts within a pair of braces in this notation. They are illustrated below with descriptions:  

As one may expect, two sets are equal if and only if they contain the same elements. Equivalently, two sets   and   are equal if and only if each element of   is also an element of   and each element of   is also an element of  . This can be regarded as an axiom [2] or a definition. If two sets   and   are equal, we write  . If not, we write  .

In this book, when we are solving an equation, we are only considering its real solution(s) unless stated otherwise.

Example.

  •  .
  •  .
  •  .
 

Exercise. Assume   and   are different elements. Is each of the following statements true or false?

1 The set   contains no elements.

True.
False.

2  

True.
False.

3   is a set.

True.
False.

4  .

True.
False.

5  .

True.
False.

6  .

True.
False.



Set cardinality

edit

If a set contains finite number of elements, it is called a finite set, and it is called an infinite set otherwise. If a set is finite, then its cardinality is its number of elements. For infinite sets, it is harder and more complicated to define their cardinalities, and so we will do this in the later chapter about set cardinalities. For each set  , its cardinality is denoted by  .

Example.

  • Let  . Then,  .
  • Let  . Then,   (not 3 since the element   is listed repeatedly).
  • Let  . Then,   since there is no solution for   (for real number  ), and thus   is an empty set.
  • Let  . Solving  , we have  . Hence,   and thus   [3].

There are some special infinite sets for which notations are given, as follows:

  •   is the set of all natural numbers (0 is not regarded as a natural number in this book).
  •   is the set of all integers.
  •   is the set of all rational numbers.
  • (nonstandard notation)   is the set of all irrational numbers.
  •   is the set of all real numbers.
  •   is the set of all complex numbers.

In particular, we can use set-builder notation to express  , as follows:  .

Example.

  •  
  •  
 

Exercise. Use set-builder notation to express   without using " " in the expression.

Solution

We can express like this:   ( ).


Subsets

edit

Definition. (Subset) A set   is a subset of a set   (denoted by  ) if each element of   is also an element of  .

Remark.

  • If   is not a subset of  , we denote it as  .
  • Recall that two sets   and   if and only if each element of   belongs to   and each element of   belongs to  . Using the notion of subsets, we can write   if and only if   and  .

Example.

  •  .
  •   (e.g.   but  )
  •   (e.g.   but  )
  • For each set  ,  , i.e. each set is a subset of itself.
  • This is because each element of set   is an element of  .
  • For each set  ,  .
  • If we want to prove this directly, there are some difficulties since   does not contain any element. So, what is meant by "each element of  "?
  • Under this situation, it may be better to prove by contradiction (a proof technique covered in the later chapter about methods of proof). First, we suppose on the contrary that  . By the negation of the definition, there is at least one element of   that is not an element of  , which is false. This yields a contradiction, and thus the hypothesis is false (explanation will be provided later), i.e.   is false.

Definition. (Proper subset) A set   is a proper subset of a set   (denoted by  ) if   is a subset of   and  .

Remark.

  • Similarly, if   is not a proper subset of  , we write  .

Example.

  • For each nonempty set  ,   since   (shown previously) and   if   is a nonempty set.
  •  .
  •  .
  •   and  .
 

Exercise. Let  .

1 Which of the following set(s) is a subset of  ?

 
 
 
 

2 Select the set(s) of which the set   is a subset.

 
 
 
 

3 Select the set(s) of which the set   is an element.

 
 
 
 


We call some commonly encountered subsets of   intervals. For each real number   such that  ,

  •   (open intervals)
  •   (half-open (or half-closed) intervals)
  •   (half-open (or half-closed) intervals)
  •   (closed intervals)

There are also some infinite intervals:

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Note:   is a shorthand of   (  is a set).

Example.

  •  .
  •  .
  •   since the element "1" of the set on LHS does not belong to the set on RHS.
  •  .

Example.

  • The set of (real) solutions of   is  .
  • The set of (real) solutions of   is  . (Note: we cannot express this set as   since it is required that   for an interval  .)
  • The set of (real) solutions of   is  .
 

Exercise.

Which of the following is (are) valid interval(s)?

 
 
 
 


Universal set and Venn diagram

edit

Definition. (Universal set) A universal set, denoted by  , is a set containing all elements considered in a certain investigation.

Example.

  • If we are studying real numbers, the universal set is  .

Definition. (Complement) The complement of a set   that is a subset of the universal set  , denoted by  , is the set  .

Example.

  • Let   and  . Then,  . (Note:   also.)
  • For each universal set  ,   (since each element of   does not belong to  [4]) and   (since there are no elements of   that does not belong to  ).
  • Let   and  . Then,   since each element of   does not belong to  .
 

Exercise. Let the universal set be  .

1 What is  ?

 
 
 
 

2 What is  ?

 
 
 
 

3 If the universal set is   instead,  . Which of the following can be   (there may be more than one answer)?

 
 
 
 
 


A Venn diagram is a diagram showing all possible logical relationships between a finite number of sets. The universal set is usually represented by a region enclosed by a rectangle, while the sets are usually represents by regions enclosed by circles. The following is a Venn diagram.

 

In this diagram, if the white region represents set   and the region enclosed by the rectangle represents the universal set, then the red region is the set  .

However, the following is not a Venn diagram.

 

This is because there are not regions in which only the yellow and blue region intersect, and only the red and green region intersect, respectively. So, not all logical relationships between the sets are shown.

To show all logical relationships between four sets, the following Venn diagram can be used.

 

Set operations

edit

Similar to the arithmetic operations for real numbers which combine two numbers into one, the set operations combine two sets into one.

Union of sets

edit

Definition. (Union of sets)

 
A Venn diagram for union of two sets.

The union of a set   and a set  , denoted by  , is the set  .

Remark.

  • The "or" here is inclusive, i.e. if an element belongs to both   and  , it also belongs to  .

Example.

  •  .
  •  .
  •  .
  •  .

Proposition. Let   and   be sets. Then,

  •  
  •   (commutative law)
  •   (associative law)
  •   and  
  •  

Proof. (Formal) proof will be discussed later. For now, you may verify these results using Venn diagram.

 

Remark.

  • Because of the associative law, we can write union of three (or more) sets without brackets. We will have similar results for intersection of sets, and so we can also write intersection of three (or more) sets without brackets.

Intersection of sets

edit

Definition. (Intersection of sets)

 
A Venn diagram for intersection of two sets.

The intersection of a set   and a set  , denoted by  , is the set  .

Remark.

  • If  , we say that   and   are disjoint.

Proposition. Let   and   be sets. Then,

  •  
  •   (commutative law)
  •   (associative law)
  •   and  
  •  

Proof. (Formal) proof will be discussed later. For now, you may verify these results using Venn diagram.

 

Proposition. (Distributive laws) Let   and   be sets. Then,

  •   (the " " is "distributed" to   and   respectively)
  •  

Relative complement

edit

Definition. (Relative complement)

 
A venn diagram for relative complement. If the region enclosed by the left and right circle represents   and   respectively, then the red region represents  .

The relative complement of a set   in a set  , denoted by  , is the set  .

Remark.

  •   if   is the universal set. So, the complement of a set   is also the relative complement of   in  .
  • The notation   is read "B with A taken away".
  • We can see from the definition that  

Example.

  •  .
  •  .
  •  .
  •  .
  •  .
 

Exercise.

1 What is  ?

 
 
 
 
 

2 What is  ?

 
 
 
 

3 What is  ?

 
 
 
 

4 Which of the following set(s) is (are) the set of all positive numbers?

 
 
 
 
 
 

5 What is  ?

 
The universal set.
 


Proposition. Let   and   be sets. Then,

  •  .
  •  .
  •  .
  •   if and only if  .
  •  .
  •  .

Proof. (Formal) proof will be discussed later. For now, you may verify these results using Venn diagram.

 

Theorem. (De Morgan's Laws) Let   and   be sets. Then,  

Proof. (Formal) proof will be discussed later. For now, you may verify these results using Venn diagram.

 

Example. Suppose the universal set is  ,   and  . Since  ,  . On the other hand, since   and  ,  .

 

Exercise.

What is  ?

 
 
 
 



Symmetric difference

edit

Definition. (Symmetric difference)

 
A Venn diagram illustrating symmetric difference.

The symmetric difference of sets   and  , denoted by  , is the set  .

Example.

  •  .
  •  
  •  

Proposition. Let   and   be sets. Then,

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •   (associative law)
  •   (commutative law)
 

Exercise.

1 What is  ?

 
 
 
 

2 What is  ?

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

3 Does  [5]? (Try to determine it using Venn diagrams. No mathematical proof is required at the moment.)

Yes.
No.



Power set

edit

Definition. (Power set) The power set of a set  , denoted by  , is the set of all subsets of  . In set-builder notation,  .

Remark.

  • Since   for each set  ,   is an element of each power set.
  • Also, since   for each set  ,   is an element of the power set  .

Example.

  •  . Its cardinality is 1.
  • If  , then  . Its cardinality is 2.
  • If  , then  . Its cardinality is 4.
  •  . Its cardinality is 8.

Theorem. (Cardinality of power set of a finite set) Let   be a finite set with cardinality  . Then,  .

Proof. Assume   is a finite set with cardinality  . Since each element of the power set   is a subset of  , it suffices to prove that there are   subsets of  . In the following, we consider subsets of   with different number of elements separately, and count the number of subsets of each of the different types using combinatorics.

  • For the subset with zero element, it is the empty set, and thus there is only one such subset.
  • For the subsets with one element, there are   subsets.
  • For the subsets with two elements, there are   subsets.
  • ...
  • For the subsets with   elements, there are   subsets.
  • For the subset with   elements, it is the set  , and thus there is only one such subset.

So, the total number of subsets of   is   by binomial theorem.

 

Remark.

  • The proof method employed here is called direct proof, which is probably the most "natural" method, and most commonly used. We will discuss methods of proof in a later chapter.
  • There are alternative ways to prove this theorem.
 

Exercise. In each of the following questions, choose the power set of the set given in the question.

1  

 
 
 
 

2  

 
 
 
 

3  

 
 
 
 

4  

 
 
 
 


It is given that  . In each of the following questions, choose the cardinality of the set given in the question.

1  

4
8
16
32

2  

0
1
2
4

3  

1
2
4
8

4  

1
2
4
8

5  

1
2
4
8



Cartesian product

edit

Definition. (Cartesian product) The Cartesian product of sets   and  , denoted by  , is  .

Remark.

  •   is the ordered pair (i.e. a pair of things for which order is important).
  • The ordered pair is used to specify points on the plane, and the ordered pair is called coordinates.
  • In particular, we have   if  .
  • (notation) We use   to denote   for each set  .
  • We can observe that  .

Example. Let   and  . Then,

  •  .
  •  .

Remark.

  • We can see from the above example that the Cartesian product is not commutative, i.e. it is not necessary for  .
 

Exercise. Let  .

1 What is   (there may be more than one answer)?

 
 
 
 
 

2 What is  ?

 
 
 
 


Similarly, we can define the Cartesian product of three or more sets.

Definition. (Cartesian product of three or more sets) Let   be an integer greater than 2. The Cartesian product of   sets   is  .

Remark.

  • (notation) We use   to denote  , where  .


  1. There are various types of axiomatic set theory, in which Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory is the most well-known one.
  2. . Indeed, this is the axiom of extension in the Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory.
  3. For sets with exactly one element, they are called singleton. In this case,   is a singleton.
  4. There are no elements belonging to  .
  5. We need not to write brackets for LHS because of the associative law.