History of wireless telegraphy and broadcasting in Australia/Topical/Biographies/John William Ormsby Hamilton/Notes

John William Ormsby Hamilton edit

Key article copies edit

Non-chronological material edit

1850s edit

1850 edit

1850 01 edit
1850 02 edit
1850 03 edit
1850 04 edit
1850 05 edit
1850 06 edit
1850 07 edit
1850 08 edit
1850 09 edit
1850 10 edit
1850 11 edit
1850 12 edit

1851 edit

1851 01 edit
1851 02 edit
1851 03 edit
1851 04 edit
1851 05 edit
1851 06 edit
1851 07 edit
1851 08 edit
1851 09 edit
1851 10 edit
1851 11 edit
1851 12 edit

1852 edit

1852 01 edit
1852 02 edit
1852 03 edit
1852 04 edit
1852 05 edit
1852 06 edit
1852 07 edit
1852 08 edit
1852 09 edit
1852 10 edit
1852 11 edit
1852 12 edit

1853 edit

1853 01 edit
1853 02 edit
1853 03 edit
1853 04 edit
1853 05 edit
1853 06 edit
1853 07 edit
1853 08 edit
1853 09 edit
1853 10 edit
1853 11 edit
1853 12 edit

1854 edit

1854 01 edit
1854 02 edit
1854 03 edit
1854 04 edit
1854 05 edit
1854 06 edit
1854 07 edit
1854 08 edit
1854 09 edit
1854 10 edit
1854 11 edit
1854 12 edit

1855 edit

1855 01 edit
1855 02 edit
1855 03 edit
1855 04 edit
1855 05 edit
1855 06 edit
1855 07 edit
1855 08 edit
1855 09 edit
1855 10 edit
1855 11 edit
1855 12 edit

1856 edit

1856 01 edit
1856 02 edit
1856 03 edit
1856 04 edit
1856 05 edit
1856 06 edit
1856 07 edit
1856 08 edit
1856 09 edit
1856 10 edit
1856 11 edit
1856 12 edit

1857 edit

1857 01 edit
1857 02 edit
1857 03 edit
1857 04 edit
1857 05 edit
1857 06 edit
1857 07 edit
1857 08 edit
1857 09 edit
1857 10 edit
1857 11 edit
1857 12 edit

1858 edit

1858 01 edit
1858 02 edit
1858 03 edit
1858 04 edit
1858 05 edit
1858 06 edit
1858 07 edit
1858 08 edit
1858 09 edit
1858 10 edit
1858 11 edit
1858 12 edit

1859 edit

1859 01 edit
1859 02 edit
1859 03 edit
1859 04 edit
1859 05 edit
1859 06 edit
1859 07 edit
1859 08 edit
1859 09 edit
1859 10 edit
1859 11 edit
1859 12 edit

1860s edit

1860 edit

1860 01 edit
1860 02 edit
1860 03 edit
1860 04 edit
1860 05 edit
1860 06 edit
1860 07 edit
1860 08 edit
1860 09 edit
1860 10 edit
1860 11 edit
1860 12 edit

1861 edit

1861 01 edit
1861 02 edit
1861 03 edit
1861 04 edit
1861 05 edit
1861 06 edit
1861 07 edit
1861 08 edit
1861 09 edit
1861 10 edit
1861 11 edit
1861 12 edit

1862 edit

1862 01 edit
1862 02 edit
1862 03 edit
1862 04 edit
1862 05 edit
1862 06 edit
1862 07 edit
1862 08 edit
1862 09 edit
1862 10 edit
1862 11 edit
1862 12 edit

1863 edit

1863 01 edit
1863 02 edit
1863 03 edit
1863 04 edit
1863 05 edit
1863 06 edit
1863 07 edit
1863 08 edit
1863 09 edit
1863 10 edit
1863 11 edit
1863 12 edit

1864 edit

1864 01 edit
1864 02 edit
1864 03 edit
1864 04 edit
1864 05 edit
1864 06 edit
1864 07 edit
1864 08 edit
1864 09 edit
1864 10 edit
1864 11 edit
1864 12 edit

1865 edit

1865 01 edit
1865 02 edit
1865 03 edit
1865 04 edit
1865 05 edit
1865 06 edit
1865 07 edit
1865 08 edit
1865 09 edit
1865 10 edit
1865 11 edit
1865 12 edit

1866 edit

1866 01 edit
1866 02 edit
1866 03 edit
1866 04 edit
1866 05 edit
1866 06 edit
1866 07 edit
1866 08 edit
1866 09 edit
1866 10 edit
1866 11 edit
1866 12 edit

1867 edit

1867 01 edit
1867 02 edit
1867 03 edit
1867 04 edit
1867 05 edit
1867 06 edit
1867 07 edit
1867 08 edit
1867 09 edit
1867 10 edit
1867 11 edit
1867 12 edit

1868 edit

1868 01 edit
1868 02 edit
1868 03 edit
1868 04 edit
1868 05 edit
1868 06 edit
1868 07 edit
1868 08 edit
1868 09 edit
1868 10 edit
1868 11 edit
1868 12 edit

1869 edit

1869 01 edit
1869 02 edit
1869 03 edit
1869 04 edit
1869 05 edit
1869 06 edit
1869 07 edit
1869 08 edit
1869 09 edit
1869 10 edit
1869 11 edit
1869 12 edit

1870s edit

1870 edit

1870 01 edit
1870 02 edit
1870 03 edit
1870 04 edit
1870 05 edit
1870 06 edit
1870 07 edit
1870 08 edit
1870 09 edit
1870 10 edit
1870 11 edit
1870 12 edit

1871 edit

1871 01 edit
1871 02 edit
1871 03 edit
1871 04 edit
1871 05 edit
1871 06 edit
1871 07 edit
1871 08 edit
1871 09 edit
1871 10 edit
1871 11 edit
1871 12 edit

1872 edit

1872 01 edit
1872 02 edit
1872 03 edit
1872 04 edit
1872 05 edit
1872 06 edit
1872 07 edit
1872 08 edit
1872 09 edit
1872 10 edit
1872 11 edit
1872 12 edit

1873 edit

1873 01 edit
1873 02 edit
1873 03 edit
1873 04 edit
1873 05 edit
1873 06 edit
1873 07 edit
1873 08 edit
1873 09 edit
1873 10 edit
1873 11 edit
1873 12 edit

1874 edit

1874 01 edit
1874 02 edit
1874 03 edit
1874 04 edit
1874 05 edit
1874 06 edit
1874 07 edit
1874 08 edit
1874 09 edit
1874 10 edit
1874 11 edit
1874 12 edit

1875 edit

1875 01 edit
1875 02 edit
1875 03 edit
1875 04 edit
1875 05 edit
1875 06 edit
1875 07 edit
1875 08 edit
1875 09 edit
1875 10 edit
1875 11 edit
1875 12 edit

1876 edit

1876 01 edit
1876 02 edit
1876 03 edit
1876 04 edit
1876 05 edit
1876 06 edit
1876 07 edit
1876 08 edit
1876 09 edit
1876 10 edit
1876 11 edit
1876 12 edit

1877 edit

1877 01 edit
1877 02 edit
1877 03 edit
1877 04 edit
1877 05 edit
1877 06 edit
1877 07 edit
1877 08 edit
1877 09 edit
1877 10 edit
1877 11 edit
1877 12 edit

1878 edit

1878 01 edit
1878 02 edit
1878 03 edit
1878 04 edit
1878 05 edit
1878 06 edit
1878 07 edit
1878 08 edit
1878 09 edit
1878 10 edit
1878 11 edit
1878 12 edit

1879 edit

1879 01 edit
1879 02 edit
1879 03 edit
1879 04 edit
1879 05 edit
1879 06 edit
1879 07 edit
1879 08 edit
1879 09 edit
1879 10 edit
1879 11 edit
1879 12 edit

1880s edit

1880 edit

1880 01 edit
1880 02 edit
1880 03 edit
1880 04 edit
1880 05 edit
1880 06 edit
1880 07 edit
1880 08 edit
1880 09 edit
1880 10 edit
1880 11 edit
1880 12 edit

1881 edit

1881 01 edit
1881 02 edit
1881 03 edit
1881 04 edit
1881 05 edit
1881 06 edit
1881 07 edit
1881 08 edit
1881 09 edit
1881 10 edit
1881 11 edit
1881 12 edit

1882 edit

1882 01 edit
1882 02 edit
1882 03 edit
1882 04 edit
1882 05 edit
1882 06 edit
1882 07 edit
1882 08 edit
1882 09 edit
1882 10 edit
1882 11 edit
1882 12 edit

1883 edit

1883 01 edit
1883 02 edit
1883 03 edit
1883 04 edit
1883 05 edit
1883 06 edit
1883 07 edit
1883 08 edit
1883 09 edit
1883 10 edit
1883 11 edit
1883 12 edit

1884 edit

1884 01 edit
1884 02 edit
1884 03 edit
1884 04 edit
1884 05 edit
1884 06 edit
1884 07 edit
1884 08 edit
1884 09 edit
1884 10 edit
1884 11 edit
1884 12 edit

1885 edit

1885 01 edit
1885 02 edit
1885 03 edit
1885 04 edit
1885 05 edit
1885 06 edit
1885 07 edit
1885 08 edit
1885 09 edit
1885 10 edit
1885 11 edit
1885 12 edit

1886 edit

1886 01 edit
1886 02 edit
1886 03 edit
1886 04 edit
1886 05 edit
1886 06 edit
1886 07 edit
1886 08 edit
1886 09 edit
1886 10 edit
1886 11 edit
1886 12 edit

1887 edit

1887 01 edit
1887 02 edit
1887 03 edit
1887 04 edit
1887 05 edit
1887 06 edit
1887 07 edit
1887 08 edit
1887 09 edit
1887 10 edit
1887 11 edit
1887 12 edit

1888 edit

1888 01 edit
1888 02 edit
1888 03 edit
1888 04 edit
1888 05 edit
1888 06 edit
1888 07 edit
1888 08 edit
1888 09 edit
1888 10 edit
1888 11 edit
1888 12 edit

1889 edit

1889 01 edit
1889 02 edit
1889 03 edit
1889 04 edit
1889 05 edit
1889 06 edit
1889 07 edit
1889 08 edit
1889 09 edit
1889 10 edit
1889 11 edit
1889 12 edit

1890s edit

1890 edit

1890 01 edit
1890 02 edit
1890 03 edit
1890 04 edit
1890 05 edit
1890 06 edit
1890 07 edit
1890 08 edit
1890 09 edit
1890 10 edit
1890 11 edit
1890 12 edit

1891 edit

1891 01 edit
1891 02 edit
1891 03 edit
1891 04 edit
1891 05 edit
1891 06 edit
1891 07 edit
1891 08 edit
1891 09 edit
1891 10 edit
1891 11 edit
1891 12 edit

1892 edit

1892 01 edit
1892 02 edit
1892 03 edit
1892 04 edit
1892 05 edit
1892 06 edit
1892 07 edit
1892 08 edit
1892 09 edit
1892 10 edit
1892 11 edit
1892 12 edit

1893 edit

1893 01 edit
1893 02 edit
1893 03 edit
1893 04 edit
1893 05 edit
1893 06 edit
1893 07 edit
1893 08 edit
1893 09 edit
1893 10 edit
1893 11 edit
1893 12 edit

1894 edit

1894 01 edit
1894 02 edit
1894 03 edit
1894 04 edit
1894 05 edit
1894 06 edit
1894 07 edit
1894 08 edit
1894 09 edit
1894 10 edit
1894 11 edit
1894 12 edit

1895 edit

1895 01 edit
1895 02 edit
1895 03 edit
1895 04 edit
1895 05 edit
1895 06 edit
1895 07 edit
1895 08 edit
1895 09 edit
1895 10 edit
1895 11 edit
1895 12 edit

1896 edit

1896 01 edit
1896 02 edit
1896 03 edit
1896 04 edit
1896 05 edit
1896 06 edit
1896 07 edit
1896 08 edit
1896 09 edit
1896 10 edit
1896 11 edit
1896 12 edit

1897 edit

1897 01 edit

Detailed report of Hamilton's first marriage in the social pages

SOCIAL. . . . The marriage of Mrs. Elizabeth Galbraith James, widow of the late Dr. James, of Heidelberg, Victoria, and only daughter of the late Mr. James Paterson Jameson, formerly of Kelmore, with Mr. John William Ormsby Hamilton, only son of the late Thomas Ormsby Hamilton, of Hobart, was solemnised at St. Andrew's Cathedral, Sydney, on Wednesday, December 23, at 2.30 p.m. The Very Rev. W. Macquarie Cowper, Dean of Sydney, officiated, and was assisted by the Revs. Read and Simpson. The service was fully choral, and the sacred edifice was beautifully decorated with ferns, hot-house plants, and choice white flowers. The bride was given away by her brother, Mr. David S. Jameson. She was handsomely dressed in white silk, handsomely trimmed with Brussels lace and chiffon. The costume was completed by a becoming picture hat of white crinoline straw, trimmed with ostrich tips, and a lovely shower bouquet; jewels — diamond pendant and gold bracelet, gifts of the bridegroom. Miss Jameson, niece of the bride, Miss Hamilton and Miss Isabelle Hamilton (sisters), and Miss Fisher (cousin of the bridegroom) were in attendance. They were similarly attired in white Indian muslin, richly finished with valenciennes, and wore picture hats to harmonise. Shower bouquets of pink roses made a happy note of contrast. Their souvenirs of the occasion were gold bamboo bracelets. Mr. T. Copley Calvert was best man, and Mr. C. H. Slade groomsman. At the conclusion of the ceremony a reception was held at the Australia, where Mr. and Mrs. Hamilton received the congratulations of their friends. Later on the newly-wedded pair left for Armidale en route for Warwick, Queensland, where they will take up their residence. The wedding gifts were both numerous and well chosen, and among those present were Mrs. James Barnet, Mr. and Mrs. John Calvert, Mr. and Mrs. John Hern, Mr. G. C. Westgarth, Mr. Artlett, Mr. and the Misses Bibby, Mr. and Mrs. Cartwright Ashe, Mr. Norman West, Mrs. Z. O. Hamilton (mother of the bridegroom), Mr. T. H. Magrath, the Misses Magrath, the Misses Fisher, the Misses Wilson, the Misses Van Henckelum, Mr. and Miss Drake, Miss Marsden, Miss Seaborn, Mr. and Mrs. Penfold, Mr. P. Cooley, and Mr. Cecil Cal-vert. [1]

1897 02 edit
1897 03 edit
1897 04 edit
1897 05 edit
1897 06 edit
1897 07 edit
1897 08 edit
1897 09 edit
1897 10 edit
1897 11 edit
1897 12 edit

1898 edit

1898 01 edit
1898 02 edit
1898 03 edit
1898 04 edit
1898 05 edit
1898 06 edit
1898 07 edit
1898 08 edit
1898 09 edit
1898 10 edit
1898 11 edit
1898 12 edit

1899 edit

1899 01 edit
1899 02 edit
1899 03 edit
1899 04 edit
1899 05 edit
1899 06 edit
1899 07 edit
1899 08 edit
1899 09 edit
1899 10 edit
1899 11 edit
1899 12 edit

1900s edit

1900 edit

1900 01 edit
1900 02 edit
1900 03 edit
1900 04 edit
1900 05 edit
1900 06 edit
1900 07 edit
1900 08 edit
1900 09 edit
1900 10 edit
1900 11 edit
1900 12 edit

1901 edit

1901 01 edit
1901 02 edit
1901 03 edit
1901 04 edit
1901 05 edit
1901 06 edit
1901 07 edit
1901 08 edit
1901 09 edit
1901 10 edit
1901 11 edit
1901 12 edit

1902 edit

1902 01 edit
1902 02 edit
1902 03 edit
1902 04 edit
1902 05 edit
1902 06 edit
1902 07 edit
1902 08 edit
1902 09 edit
1902 10 edit
1902 11 edit
1902 12 edit

1903 edit

1903 01 edit
1903 02 edit
1903 03 edit
1903 04 edit
1903 05 edit
1903 06 edit
1903 07 edit
1903 08 edit
1903 09 edit
1903 10 edit
1903 11 edit
1903 12 edit

1904 edit

1904 01 edit
1904 02 edit
1904 03 edit
1904 04 edit
1904 05 edit
1904 06 edit
1904 07 edit
1904 08 edit
1904 09 edit
1904 10 edit
1904 11 edit
1904 12 edit

Apparent first reference in Trove for Hamilton and wireless telegraphy

The representatives of an English wireless telegraphy company (Mr J. W. Ormsby Hamilton) approached the Postmaster-General on Thursday, and asked him if it would not be possible to establish the system in the Commonwealth with advantage to the Postal Department. Mr Sydney Smith stated that he did not think wireless telegraphy was required in the settled portions of the Commonwealth, and it was then suggested that a communication might be established between British New Guinea, Thursday Island, and Queensland. The Postmaster-General declined to commit his department to a project of this character, but admitted that it was possible that the Defence Department might favorably consider such a proposal.[2]

1905 edit

1905 01 edit
1905 02 edit
1905 03 edit
1905 04 edit
1905 05 edit

First detailed description of proposal of International Telegraph Construction Co with commentary by Hamilton

WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. AN AUSTRALIAN SCHEME. LOOPING ISLANDS AND MAINLAND. The Postmaster-General, the Minister of Defence and the Admiral in command of the Australian squadron have under consideration an important and far-reaching scheme for the installation of the Shoemaker system of wireless telegraphy, submitted to it by Mr. J. W. Hamilton, attorney for the Commonwealth of the International Telegraph Construction Company of London and New York. The scheme, as far as it affects the Commonwealth, proposes to couple up New Zealand with Australia direct, and again via Tasmania, and also via Lord Howe Island and Norfolk Island; then to link Queensland with Port Moresby, in New Guinea, and with Samarai, in the same possession. It also embraces a series of stations beginning in Queensland and reaching out to Yapp Island, in the Carolines Group, and so on to the cable routes radiating from Yapp Island, via Samarai and Herbertshohe, in German New Guinea. As far as the Admiralty is concerned, the scheme proposes to install six of the ships of the Australian squadron with the instruments, at a cost which will for a few hundred pounds place Admiral Fanshawe in possession and absolute control of generator, receiving and sending apparatus, without any vexatious royalties to pay or outside interference to combat. The inducement held out in connection with the linking of New Zealand and Australia with the Shoemaker system is a reduction in the rates for messages from 4½d. to 1d. per word. This reduction, it is claimed, is no mere guesswork. The company's agents point out that the cost of wireless telegraphy installation and maintenance is about 10 per cent. of that of a submarine cable. There is, it is remarked, a company being formed at the present time to connect Monte Mario, in Italy, with a station in Argentina, 6000 miles away, where 4,000,000 Italians live, by means of which messages will be sent for 6 c. a word, as against the present cable charge of 1 dol. 50 c. per word! The reduction is here far greater than that proposed in connection with the Australia-New Zealand stations. The guarantees in the matter of continuous service offered by Mr. Hamilton to the Federal authorities are remarkable. They embrace a minimum continuous transmission of twenty-five words a minute where poles or an elevation of 200 feet high is obtainable, and a maximum of forty words a minute. When it is remembered that the majority of cables cannot go higher than ten words a minute, the revolution in long distance transmission now proposed can be easily appreciated. To these guarantees is added another, to the effect that the messages sent by the Shoemaker instruments cannot be cut into, as is the case with other systems, by other messages. Interference is reduced to an absolute minimum. In case some slight interference is detectable a very simple operation counteracts it at once. The present position of the scheme is that the Federal and Admiralty authorities are investigating its merits. Mr. Hamilton has had several interviews with Mr. Sydney Smith and his adviser, Mr. Hesketh, the departmental electrician. Sir Joseph Ward, Postmaster-General of New Zealand, is much taken by the proposals, and is pressing the Commonwealth authorities to take some decided action in connection with them.


In the course of an interview yesterday Mr. Hamilton supplemented the facts summarised above with an interesting statement concerning the advantages of wireless telegraphy generally, and of the particular system he is in Australia to represent. "Wireless telegraphy," he said, has many obvious advantages over the old submarine cable system. The cable system is not only more costly, but it is ineffective for defence purposes. Wireless telegraphy is, in fact, indispensable, present methods of warfare being considered. It enables, for example, messages to be transmitted over a distance of 2000 miles, between fleets, with the utmost accuracy. Take the case of the "Times" enterprise during the present war. The instruments used on the "Times" ship were so effective that they became a positive terror to the belligerents. The "Times" got to know too much, and was ordered off by the Japanese authorities, and the senders were threatened with instant death by the Russians. Messages of 2000 words were sent continuously with perfect accuracy. Our instruments — those invented by Mr. Harry Shoemaker — were used by the "Times" for this enterprise in preference to five other competing systems. We were then working with the De Forrest [sic] company, but have now separated, and have a distinct company. In addition, I may mention that the American Government has selected our Shoemaker instruments for installation on United States war ships. The British Government has also given instructions for them to be tested, with, presumably, a similar end in view. Mr. Shoemaker has quite recently entered into a ten year contract with the Western Union Telegraph Company of America for the utilisation of his system by that great corporation. We have already, in working operation daily, stations at Wilson's Point, Connecticut and Point Judith, Rhode Island, which are in connection with other stations 550 miles distant. Those stations operate without a hitch. Even American river steamers are being equipped with wireless telegraphy apparatus, so useful has it become in commercial life."[3]

PMG clarifies the Government's position on the proposal of the International Telegraph Construction Co

NEWS OF THE DAY. . . . The Postmaster-General, while interested in the description given in yesterday's issue of "The Age" of the offer made by the International Telegraph Construction Company of a wireless telegraphy scheme which will link Australia with Tasmania, New Zealand, British New Guinea and a number of the islands of the Pacific, declines to state at present whether or not the scheme is officially regarded as an acceptable one. The Minister of Defence was in negotiation with the Admiralty over the matter, in order that the British and Commonwealth authorities might have the same system for defence purposes. So, until the whole matter was further advanced, no statement could be made.[4]

Adelaide Register reports a little differently

COMMONWEALTH NOTES. MELBOURNE, May 26. . . . Wireless Telegraphy. The postal authorities ere perplexed by the contradictory information received regarding the merits of rival wireless telegraphy inventions. The Shoemaker Company has offered to provide a wireless service between New Zealand and Australia. Mr. Hesketh, chief electrical engineer of the Queensland Postal Department, was asked if this company was well known in the old world, and he is almost unable to recall its existence. The postal officials have therefore asked the Minister for Defence to cable to the Admiralty regarding the overture of the company, and also to ascertain if the British Government has any agreement with the Marconi Company respecting the equipment of British warships with wireless apparatus.[5]

Sydney Sunday Times report, again a little different

WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY FOR AUSTRALIA. ("SUNDAY TIMES" SPECIAL MESSAGE.) MELBOURNE, Saturday Night. Referring to the matter of installing a system of wireless telegraphy between Australia and New Zealand, also to its proposed use in various parts of the Commonwealth, the Postmaster-General said today that he could not state yet whether the Marconi or some other system would be adopted. Mr. Smith has referred a question on this subject to the Defence Department, and he proposes ascertaining what the British authorities have done in the matter before he fixes upon any particular system. "The Marconi people, I understand," he said, "will not work their system in conjunction with any other, and if it happened that we adopted another system, while the British Government had a contract with Marconi, we might find ourselves in difficulties at war time. I shall do nothing definite in the matter until I get full particulars of what the British Government has done."[6]

Hamilton advises the Shoemaker has taken out no fewer than 80 patents in wireless telegraphy

COMMONWEALTH NOTES. MELBOURNE, May 29. . . . Wireless Telegraphy.— No fewer than 80 patents in connection with wireless telegraphy have been taken out by Mr. Schumacher, whose system and instruments have been placed under offer to the Federal authorities by Mr. J. W. Hamilton, the Australian representative of the International Telegraph Construction Company. It was stated in error last week that the proposal emanated from the Schumacher Company. Mr. Hesketh, the electrical engineer of the Queensland Postal Department, has examined a specification of Schumacher's latest patent, but negotiations between Mr. Hamilton and the Federal authorities have been suspended pending the receipt of certain information which the Admiralty has been asked to supply.[7]

Sydney Evening News opinion piece based heavily on the 26 May 1905 article

CHEAP AND WIRELESS. WHILE the local military forces are returning to first principles in the shape of communication by means of carrier pigeons, the Federal military authorities are considering a new scheme of wireless telegtapliy with the same purpose in view. At the Victoria Barracks in Sydney there is talk of establishing a "columbary," or home for pigeons; while in Melbourne is being discussed the possibility of linking islands and continents and spanning oceans and seas by electricity. As a pastime the training and flying of post-pigeons is a harmless sort of amusement enough; but in the presence of the discovery of wireless telegraphy the utility of its pursuit seems fairly open to question. A proposal, it appears, has been made to the Commonwealth Government by a London and New York firm of experts to connect Australia with New Zealand once direct, and again via Tasmania, Lord Howe Island, and Norfolk Island; also to effect communication between Queensland, the Carolines, and German New Guinea. Of course, most people have realised that the contest between submarine and wireless telegraphy most sooner or later reach an acute stage. So far as regards this country, always supposing that those responsible for the present offer are able to fulfil their promises, and of that there would appear to be small doubt, the contest would seem about to begin. And it must be confessed that the inducements offered in favour of the wireless scheme are very great. For instance, the International Construction Company say that by its system, if adopted, there will be a reduction in the rates for messages between Australia and New Zealand from 4½d to 1d per word. The cost of installation, it is claimed, is so much less than that of the submarine cable as to leave a profit even on the scale of the enormously lower charge. In support of this statement, an instance is quoted of an undertaking which is being entered upon in Italy to connect a station in that country with one in Argentina at a distance of 6000 miles. Messages over this route will be forwarded for 1 cent. per word, as compared with the existing cable rates of 1 dollar 50 cents. per word — or in the proportion of one halfpenny as against six shillings. The conditions offered by the representative of the International Company to the Federal Government are well worth noting for their comprehensiveness and guaranteed effectiveness. Where an elevation of 200ft in height is procurable, either by erecting poles or taking advantage of the natural features of the country, a continuous transmission of 25 words a minute as a minimum, and of 40 words as a maximum is vouched for. This improvement on the submarine cable's average of speed of 10 words per minute is a most important feature of the system; as is also the guarantee that, unlike some of the other systems, this one of Shoemaker's cannot be interfered with and rendered unintelligible by other messages. Considered in its entirety, this wonderful and far-reaching scheme seems to carry with it extraordinary possibilities in the future. There appears, indeed, to be no reason, if the present proposals ever take successful and concrete form, why the "Hertzian wave" should not send its vibrations across the Australian continent, via Singapore and Java, to England and Europe. Such a service at popular rates would render submarine cables worth less than their weight as old wire. And there can be no question but that at the present moment, even, attention is being devoted in other directions than ours towards those surfaces of the globe in which it is possible to send messages chiefly by landlines, and to bridge over comparatively small spaces of sea by the wireless method. Viewed in the light of recent discoveries and of improvements in the latest instruments, the success or otherwise of any undertaking of the kind seems to lie, to a great extent with the ability to construct convenient stations for the receiving or sending of messages. And perhaps it may be possible to presently perfect arrangements so as to cause the receiver at any particular point to translate its message into a form suitable for sending automatically. When, if such an invention has not already been hit upon, this can be done, many of the wayside stations will be almost wholly self-working, and ocean floating stations will waft the world's news and the messages of the world's people over the length and breadth of the earth. In both warfare and commerce the perfected system of wireless telegraphy will prove invaluable. Deep-sea cables can be groped for and cut by an enemy; but one can neither cut the impalpable atmosphere, nor "tap" the invisible "wave." With reference to the particular scheme submitted to the Federal Government, we are told that the Commonwealth and Admiralty authorities are giving it their careful consideration. Were the Naval Commander-in-Chief on the station to have his ships all fitted with the requisite apparatus, and in addition to possess personal controlling power over the sending and receiving instruments, the advantages of such a plan are too obvious to need comment. Meanwhile, perhaps in place of experimenting with pigeons the local military forces might do well to inquire into what may with a certain amount of assurance be advanced as the superior claims for their purposes of wireless telegraphy.[8]

1905 06 edit

Audley Coote emerges as another promoter of the International Telegraph Construction Co

WIRELESS SYSTEM OF TELEGRAPHY. ACROSS THE PACIFIC OCEAN. LOOPING THE COLONIES AND ISLANDS. A few days ago an article was republished in these columns from the Melbourne "Age," giving some particulars of an important proposal, now under consideration by the Postmaster-General, the Minister for Defence, and the Admiralty in command of the Australasian squadron, for the installation of a system of wireless telegraphy, which will couple up Australia with New Zealand, thence stretching away across the Pacific to Fiji, Samoa, Fanning Island, Honolulu, and on to San Francisco. As far an the Admiralty is concerned, the scheme proposed to instal six of the ships of the Australian squadron with the instruments at a cost which will for a few hundred pounds place Admiral Fanshawe in possession and absolute control of generator, receiving, and sending apparatus, without any vexatious royalties to pay or outside interference to combat. The inducement held out in connection with the linking of New Zealand and Australia, is a reduction in the rates for messages from 4½d to 1d per word, and a minimum continuous : transmission of 25 words a minute, where poles of an elevation of 200ft. high are obtainable, and a maximum of 40 words a minute, in comparison with the present cable rate of transmission of something like 15 to 20 words a minute. The suggested system is that known as the Shoemaker system, a definite offer, as far as the coupling up of Australia and New Zealand is concerned having been made by Messrs. J. W. Hamilton and Audley Coote, advisory representatives of the International Telegraph Construction Company of London and New York, who are at present in Australia. The present position of the matter, however, is that the Federal and Admiralty authorities are investigating its merits. The Postmaster-General of New Zealand, Sir Joseph Ward, displayed considerable interest in the scheme when he was in Australia recently, and discussed it with the Federal Postmaster-General, and on his returning to his own colony, he expressed the opinion that there was a possibility of the proposals fructifying. Further than that, there is just now no definite information. Mr. Audley Coote, who is at present in Sydney, on being interviewed by a "Daily Telegraph" representative, supplied some additional information regarding the scheme generally, and the possibilities of wireless telegraph, to the development of which considerable attention is now being given, on account of its immediate, as well as its prospective value as a comparatively cheap agent for rapid communication by sea and by land. THE SHOEMAKER SYSTEM. "You hear," he said, "a great deal now about the wireless system of telegraphy, principally the Marconi system, but there are other wireless systems said to be equally reliable, and which are now being worked successfully for both Governments and companies. For instance, the Harry Shoemaker system, the instruments and patents for which were used by the De Forest Wireless Company on the London "Times' " chartered steamer at the commencement of the Japanese-Russian war. All these wireless patents are now held by the International Telegraph Construction Company, of London and New York. Fresh developments in wireless telegraphy seem to be eagerly sought after by English and American companies. News comes to hand that Mr. Shoemaker, of Philadelphia, who was at one time the leading technical spirit of the De Forest Company, has made such improvements in his system, now called the 'Shoemaker system,' that he is enabled to send and receive messages perfectly and continuously through mountainous country, in any weather, over a distance of 800 miles by land and 1200 miles by water. This is a record, as no other company's system has so far been able to achieve such results. "It is generally known that trouble has arisen in connection with the wireless system in the way of interference with other systems when messages are in course of transmission. This difficulty, however, has quite recently been entirely overcome by Mr. Shoemaker's latest patents, which provide for such a contingency, and which secure non-interference. Mr. Shoemaker is now actively engaged in putting his system to further practical use, having formed a company which is now installing systems in the United States, South America, and the Pacific Islands, for use in commercial and shipping circles. The leading telegraph company of the United States, viz., the Western Union, has undertaken to co-operate with him in opening up fresh stations." THE DOOM OF THE CABLE. Mr. Coote, who has probably had to do with the laying of more cables than any man in Australia, solemnly, but still with conviction, pronounces the coming doom of the submarine cable with the advance of the wireless system of communication. "They can now be left," he says, "to Force Majeure, or, say, 'the devils of the sea,' for the reason that the wireless system is coming so rapidly to the fore that I think it will come into general use as quickly as that of the telephone. For instance, there would be no difficulty at the present moment of coupling up with the wireless system Sydney and Honolulu, a distance of about 6000 miles, using the most convenient islands en route as 'stepping-stones' for stations, in distances of about 1200 miles apart. The immediate offer made by the International Telegraph Construction Company to the Federal Government and New Zealand is for a route from Sydney by way of Lord Howe Island to Auckland, New Zealand. An alternative route suggested is one from Victoria to Tasmania, and thence to the Bluff, New Zealand. For this we guarantee a 30 words per minute continuous service. "The proposed extended route, to give rapid communication across the Pacific, is this:— Say, Sydney to Lord Howe Island, thence to Auckland (New Zealand), thence Suva and Fiji, thence Pago Pago and Samoa, thence Fanning Island, thence Honolulu, Hawaii — in all about 6000 miles. The longest stretch would be 2500 miles, between Honolulu and San Francisco. At present, as I have already pointed out, the wireless system is not wholly effective beyond a range of 1200 miles, but nevertheless I am convinced that within 12 months this 'toll-gate' will be swept away, and the long-distance difficulty will be surmounted — at least to the extent that distances like that just mentioned will be within easy range of the system. The cable, as you are perhaps aware, is not so effective over a long distance as it is over a short one — the messages take much longer to transmit. So with the wireless system at present. The ether waves do not operate so freely over a long distance, but as the difficulty of sending messages through mountainous country and their interruption by contact with another system has been overcome by our system, so will the long-distance trouble." SOME COMPARISONS. Mr. Coote went into a comparison of the cable system with the wireless system, for the purpose of showing the advantages of the latter. "Take," he said, "the nearest cable to us, the Pacific cable. That cable cost over £2,000,000, which also provided for the repairing ship, costing £100,000, and which now costs of itself £10,000 a year to maintain. The communication could be now given with the wireless system for £200,000. This Pacific cable is, as you are aware, a Government undertaking, and has in one of its sections a single stretch of cable 3500 miles in one length. This stretch is their 'toll gate,' and will always remain so, because the messages that travel rapidly over their ordinary stretches of cable do not travel at the same rate of speed over this long-distance section. "Now, take the wireless system of telegraphy. The 'ether rays' above us are there, and will remain there till the crack of doom, and only require to be tapped and made use of for all time. They are already harnessed, and can be held by the various systems at quite an infinitesimal cost compared with the making and laying of submarine cables. For instance, you are probably aware that I laid the first section of the Pacific cable, viz., from Queensland to New Caledonia, a distance of about 900 miles. This cable cost to make and lay about £200,000. The two places could be coupled up by the wireless system at very small cost in comparison. The bottom of the sea has fallen in twice since the cable was laid, and twice broke the cable. In one instance the subsidence left a chasm nearly as large as Tasmania. The cost of repairs to the cable have each time been heavy. When I tell you, further, that a submarine range of mountains was discovered as high as the Himalayas — 18,000ft. — about 500 miles off the coast of Queensland, and coming up to within 900ft. of the surface of the ocean, that will, I think, give some idea of the trouble to lay and locate a cable round the sidlings of such unseen archipelagos." A FURTHER SCHEME. Mr. Coote has also maturing a scheme for coupling up New Caledonia and the New Hebrides with the wireless system of telegraphy. The New Hebrides are now isolated, except for the monthly steamship service to and from Sydney. "Before the Consul-General for France left Sydney," said Mr. Coote, "I had an interview with him on the subject, and also with the Governor of New Caledonia, who was in Sydney recently. They were both favorable to the proposal which I put before them, and they will, I understand advise their Government that it should be accepted. The scheme provides for the installation of the wireless system from New Caledonia, now connected by cable with Queensland, to Vila, New Hebrides, where both the French and the British Residents have their headquarters. I am in hopes of being able to arrange in connection with this proposal for a joint purse between the Federal Government and the New Caledonia local Government, with respect to meeting interest, etc., on the cost, which will not amount to more than £10,000. For that sum, in fact, we could hand over the system as a going concern, in full working order. As to its advantages in the interests of shipping and commerce in those parts, I need only point, as an instance, to the case of the Fiji steamer Pilbarra. If the wireless system had been in vogue, the mishap would have been known here in half an hour after her plight was discovered at the New Hebrides. "You may rest assured," said Mr. Coote, in conclusion, "that those long-headed, clever, engineering wireless experts have come to stay, and I feel sure in quite the near future the wireless system will be soon established in Australia and the outside world, as easy and free in its methods as the cable offices are today, but with rates astonishing in their cheapness in comparison with those existing today."[9]

Sydney Sunday Times lends its support to the proposal of the International Telegraph Construction Co

Mr. Sydney Smith, Postmaster-General, has a great chance in connection with wireless telegraphy, and we have reason to believe that he discerns it, and is giving the subject much thought. His development of the telephone services in the country is an indication that he is a live Minister, ready to adopt new ideas, and he may be sure of appreciation of further efforts to serve the public convenience. In the larger work lying to his hand he has an opportunity of rearing a lasting monument to himself.[10]

Map illustrating main and alternative routes for proposal of International Telegraph Construction Co

WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY SCHEME. (Start Graphic Caption) The sketch map here given will make clear to readers of the article on wireless telegraphy, published on Saturday, the scheme proposed by the representatives of the International Telegraph Construction Company of London and New York for coupling up Australia with New Zealand, Fiji, Samoa, Fanning Island, Honolulu, and San Francisco. The scheme, so far as it relates to Australia and New Zealand, is now under consideration by the Commonwealth and New Zealand Governments, and it is stated that the Admiralty is also interested in the proposals, which offer the advantages of what is claimed will prove a cheap and speedy means of communication. (End Graphic Caption)[11]

Sydney Daily Telegraph expresses conditional support for the proposal of the International Telegraph Construction Co

WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. The "fairy tale of science" of today not infrequently becomes the humdrum handmaid of mankind tomorrow. And this it would seem is likely to be the case with wireless telegraphy. Negotiations for the installation of the Shoemaker system between Australia and New Zealand, with the possibility of continuing the connection to Honolulu and thence to San Francisco, are now in progress, and should the installation become an established fact, it could hardly fail to prove an enormous benefit to the people of Australia, both for national and private purposes. Communication with the outside world would be provided at a small fraction of the cost of communication by cable, and the new system would be absolutely free from either accidental or intentional interruption. Cheap, speedy, and safe communication with the rest of the world is what the Commonwealth badly needs, and when it is obtained, doubtless many of the prejudices, founded on ignorance, which still prevail in the minds of certain people in Europe with regard to Australia, may disappear. For the purpose of national defence, the installation of some trustworthy system of wireless telegraphy — that is to say, whatever system may be decided upon by experts as most suitable for Australian needs — is in these days an absolute necessity. Potential enemies of the Empire in every part of the world are fully equipped with the means of sending messages without the intervention of wires, and for the Commonwealth to be faced with the prospect of hostilities against such enemies, when no workable system of the same kind is in existence in Australia, would be to terribly hamper the defenders. Wireless telegraphy, as many phases of the naval operations at Port Arthur showed, is a powerful weapon for attack, and also for defence. The Commonwealth cannot afford to do without that weapon when other countries are armed with it, any more than Australia could afford to do without the machine gun or the magazine rifle. On this point, however, the selection of the particular system to be adopted is of vital importance. For defence purposes, it will probably be considered necessary to have the same system which is in use on the ships of the British navy, or, at any rate, some system by which communication with British warships could the maintained. But if the defence authorities find wireless telegraphy a necessity, the commercial world also will welcome it as a boon. A great deal of business between Australia and Europe is at present transacted by means of the submarine cable as in every way preferable to the slow, tedious, and, in recent times, untrustworthy postal service. When it may take nearly three months to receive by post the answer from London of a question asked in Sydney, the questioner naturally uses the cable if he can afford it, and gets his question answered in 24 hours. Nothing but the heavy expense of cable communication prevents its convenience from being far more largely utilised. It may be safely conjectured that if a business man could for a few shillings send a message to London which at present costs him almost as many pounds, he would choose that means of communication every time as against the postal service, with its tedious delays. A satisfactory wireless system therefore might be expected to develop fresh commerce as well as to materially assist the protection of existing commerce at sea. Possibly, like most new inventions, at first it would bring with it certain small inconveniences for special classes. The busy brain-worker who is in need of rest could not hope to find it by adopting the favorite prescription of a long sea voyage. The longer the voyage the more he would be worried by daily messages conveying to him all that unduly exciting information which his physician was so anxious that he should escape. Then again the criminal flying from justice would be safer almost anywhere than on board a ship, the captain of which might any morning receive per ethergram the published description of the fugitive and the full account of his crime. However, the disadvantage to the criminal would be amply compensated by the gain to justice, and in this respect also the value of the new means of communication would be undoubted. At present the remoteness and the isolation of Australia have fostered ignorance in the rest of the world on the subject of Australian conditions. To reduce remoteness and annihilate isolation are the special functions of wireless telegraphy. The early installation of a cheap, rapid, and efficient system will be heartily welcomed.[12]

Brisbane Courier Mail expresses conditional support for the proposal of the International Telegraph Construction Co

WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. The wide use of wireless telegraphy in connection with the Russo-Japanese war, both by belligerents and war correspondents, has done much to demonstrate the practicableness of the ethergram methods. Naturally those concerned in the wider strategic aspects of defence in these seas are giving serious consideration to the supplementing of the cable system by installations of wireless telegraphy, and the result so far as it has been outlined, is a proposal of a very important nature to Australia and the neighbouring territories. A scheme has been submitted to the Federal Government for linking up New Zealand with Australia direct, and by way of Tasmania, also by way of Lord Howe Island and Norfolk Island; then for linking up Queensland with Port Moresby and Samarai, in New Guinea. In addition it is proposed to connect Queensland with Yapp Island, in the Carolines, and places en route, and so on to the cable routes, we are told, "radiating from Yapp Island, via Samarai and Herbertshohe, in German New Guinea." The scheme has been submitted by Mr. J. W. Hamilton, attorney for the International Telegraph Construction Company of London and New York. It is proposed to install six ships of the Australian squadron with the Shoemaker instruments, and at a cost, we are told, of a few hundred pounds, "place Admiral Fanshawe in possession and absolute control of generator, receiving and sending apparatus, without any vexatious royalties to pay or outside interference to combat." For the Shoemaker system many advantages are claimed, and the offer made on behalf of the International Telegraph Construction Company includes a reduction in transmission rates between New Zealand and Australia from 4½d. to 1d., with a greatly increased speed in sending messages along the line. The offer made is under the consideration of the Federal Government and the Admiralty authorities, and Mr. Hamilton has discussed it with Mr. Sydney Smith, Postmaster-General, and with Mr. Hesketh, the electrical adviser to the department. When it is remembered that communication by wireless telegraphy has been made over 2000 miles between fleets it will be conceded that this linking up of the main British centres in the Pacific seems quite within the range of practical operations. Should it prove successful it will considerably modify the present Australian and New Zealand strategic schemes in so far as naval defence is concerned, and the risk of an enemy coming down on our coasts without warning will be very considerably mitigated. In connection with this matter it may not be out of place to urge the necessity for the early opening of wireless communication between Brisbane and Cape Moreton. This is a matter of commercial importance apart altogether from its desirableness in the way of conveying urgent news to and from the Cape. The decision of the Federal Government and the Admiralty upon the Shoemaker system submitted by Mr. Hamilton will be looked for with much interest.[13]

1905 07 edit

Ernest Kilburn Scott elicits information from Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co evidencing breach of Marconi patents by Shoemaker

WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. Mr. E. Kilburn Scott, of the Electrical Engineering Laboratory, Sydney University, writes: "Knowing that the Marconi Company would be interested in the various references regarding wireless telegraphy which have appeared recently in the Australian press, I sent them copies, and in reply I have today received the following interesting cablegram from London:— 'Contract with Italian Government for station Monte Mario communicate with Argentine is with Marconi Company. In action won by Marconi in United States Court against De Forrest, judge said Shoemaker claims so utterly unsupported they will not be discussed.' "From the above it will be seen that after the most mature consideration 'the Italian Government has definitely contracted for the establishment of communication from Italy to the Argentine in South America, a distance of over 6000 miles, or about double the distance between Poldhu, in Cornwall, and Cape Breton, in Canada, which the Marconi Company has successfully worked for some time. "This great increase in the distance of transmission leads one to think that perhaps the time when wireless messages may reach Australia from Europe is not so far distant, for in this new contract the distance is about the same as from West Australia to Suez. It will thus be seen that connecting up Australia with New Zealand and the various islands is play-work compared with what is now being done, and there ought certainly to be no foolish talk about experimenting, as the work only requires to be put in hand. "The dismissal of the claims by the judge of the United States Court, as mentioned in the second paragraph of the cablegram, is very significant, because it may be assumed that if a company is unable to support its claims in its own country there is very little likelihood of its faring better elsewhere. The position is especially interesting in view of the fact that the British Government have identified themselves with the Marconi system only, and it shows that they have been well advised in taking this step."[14]

The Sydney Evening News provides Scott's full letter to the editor (only the last portion here transcribed)

. . . If it is true, as the evidently inspired article of May 27 would have us believe, that the Commonwealth Government are considering a contract for an installation on the Shoemaker system, then I think they would be advised to first make sure of the legal position. At this juncture it cannot be too widely known that Mr. Marconi has successfully defended his wireless telegraph patent in the Supreme Court of the United States against infringement by the De Forrest Company. In commenting on this judgment, the "Electrical World and Engineer," of New York, which is one of the leading and most influential technical journals in the world, says:— As to the argument of the counsel for the defendant that the said prior disclosures and the imperfect operation of Marconi's apparatus prior to 1898 or 1899, when he introduced various improvements, deprived the original patent of all claim of novelty except for specific improvements on various parts of prior existing complete systems, the court held that this contention is not well founded, and that the facts stated serve to support the claim for Marconi of a high exercise of inventive ability. No prior existing system was complete, or had been shown or conceived to be commercially operative. A sufficient answer to the attempts to belittle Marconi's great invention is that with the whole scientific world awakened by the disclosures of Hertz in 1887 to the new and undeveloped possibilities of electric waves, nine years elapsed without a single practical or commercially successful result, and that Marconi was the first to describe and the first to achieve the transmission of defined intelligible signals. Trusting you will be able to insert my somewhat lengthy letter.— Yours, etc., E. KILBURN SCOTT. Electrical Engineering Laboratory, Sydney University, July 5, 1905. [15]

Hamilton provides a defence of the Shoemaker System against Scott's promotion of Marconi's System

WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. TO THE EDITOR OF THE HERALD. Sir,— Referring to Mr. Kilburn Scott's comments on wireless telegraphy, and his endeavour to belittle the Shoemaker system to the unmerited advantage of that of Marconi, I beg to point out that his statements place Mr. Shoemaker in an entirely false position, when he says that Mr. Shoemaker's claims were "utterly unsupported" in the action Marconi v De Forest. As a matter of fact Mr. Shoemaker's interests have long ceased to be identical with those of De Forest; the points brought forward in the case were therefore quite immaterial to the Shoemaker system as it is worked today. I think that in justice to Mr. Shoemaker, the following facts should be made known:— 1. Over 80 patents have been granted in the United States and other countries for his inventions in wireless telegraphy. 2. Letters patent have recently been granted him covering New Zealand and the Commonwealth of Australia. 3. The Shoemaker system is now being installed by the United States Government on their latest battleships and land stations, such contracts being placed with us in spite of competition with all other known "wireless" companies, including the Marconi company, notwithstanding the fact that the rival tenderers offered lower terms. Important contracts have also been entered into with the Republican Governments in South America. 4. The British Government sent an expert commission to America specially to inquire into and to test the Shoemaker. The report made was most favourable and highly recommended the system for service, with the result that we have been requested to furnish two complete equipments for installing our system by the English Admiralty. This action on the part of the British Government quite disposes of the error made by Mr. Scott. It will be seen from the foregoing that he is wrong in stating that the British authorities are identified only with the Marconi system. Admitted that the British Government have given Marconi very liberal assistance, it need not follow that the whole mantle of "wireless" genius has fallen on his shoulders. Slow as the English proverbially are in adopting new inventions, the action of the Admiralty proves that they are fully alive to the advantages to be gained by inquiry. It would be absurd to suppose that any Government would be so blind to public interest as to limit their "wireless" negotiations to one company and system when there exists such immense scope for development in the art as known today. I am, etc., J. W. HAMILTON. International Telegraph Construction Co. Melbourne, July 13.[16]

Scott again responds to Hamilton's letter, almost a promoter of the Marconi System

WIRELESS TELEGRAPH. TO THE EDITOR OF THE HERALD. Sir,— I have been expecting the reply from Mr. Hamilton to my letter. Regarding the first paragraph, I simply have to repeat the statement made in the cablegram, viz.:— "In action won by Marconi in United States Court against De Forrest, Judge said Shoemaker's claims so utterly unsupported they will not be discussed." The fact that De Forrest and Shoemaker are now dissociated does not materially affect the above statement of the Judge. Regarding the 80 patents which have been taken out, I am too old in business matters to think much of such a statement. It is very easy to get a patent granted, especially under our laws, but it does not follow that it is novel, or at any rate a master patent. After the investigations of Hertz, Professors Hughes, Oliver Lodge, and Fleming, and others us well as Marconi, I do not believe anyone can now bring forward eight, much less eighty valid patents in wireless telegraph apparatus. Amongst technical men, all the principles of the system are common knowledge. Regarding the British Government, Mr. Hamilton says Shoemaker's system was investigated. Why, of course, and so was every other wireless telegraph system. The fact remains that the British Government entered into an agreement with the Marconi Company only, which came into force last January, whereby telegrams are now accepted in every telegraph office in the United Kingdom for transmission through any of the Marconi stations to America, the Continent, or to the many steamships which are equipped. Regarding the British Navy, every battleship and cruiser is equipped with Marconi apparatus, and, far from being slow, as Mr. Hamilton, insinuates, we were the first to appreciate wireless communication. The British Navy has had the Marconi apparatus in use for a considerable period. Regarding the Commonwealth Government and the Shoemaker system, I only say that it would be well for the Government to make quite sure of the legal position. At this juncture it cannot be too widely known that Mr. Marconi has successfully defended his wireless telegraph patent in the Supreme Court of the United States against infringement. In commenting on this judgment the "Electrical World and Engineer" of New York, one of the leading and most influential technical journals in the world, says:— "As to the argument of the counsel for the defendant that the said prior disclosures and the imperfect operation of Marconi's apparatus prior to 1898 or 1899, when he introduced various improvements, deprived the original patent of all claim of novelty, except for specific improvements on various parts of prior-existing complete systems, the Court held that the contention is not well founded, and that the facts stated serve to support the claim for Marconi of a high exercise of inventive ability. No prior existing system was complete, or had been shown or conceived to be commercially operative. A sufficient answer to the attempts to belittle Marconi's great invention is that, with the whole scientific world awakened by the disclosures of Hertz in 1887 to the new and undeveloped possibilities of electric waves, nine years elapsed without a single practical or commercially successful result, and that Marconi was the first to describe and the first to achieve the transmission of defined, intelligible signals." I am, etc., E. KILBURN SCOTT, Electrical Engineering Department, Sydney University. July 17.[17]

1905 08 edit
1905 09 edit
1905 10 edit
1905 11 edit
1905 12 edit

1906 edit

1906 01 edit
1906 02 edit
1906 03 edit
1906 04 edit
1906 05 edit
1906 06 edit
1906 07 edit
1906 08 edit
1906 09 edit
1906 10 edit
1906 11 edit
1906 12 edit

1907 edit

1907 01 edit
1907 02 edit
1907 03 edit
1907 04 edit
1907 05 edit
1907 06 edit
1907 07 edit
1907 08 edit
1907 09 edit
1907 10 edit
1907 11 edit
1907 12 edit

1908 edit

1908 01 edit
1908 02 edit
1908 03 edit
1908 04 edit
1908 05 edit
1908 06 edit
1908 07 edit
1908 08 edit
1908 09 edit
1908 10 edit
1908 11 edit
1908 12 edit

1909 edit

1909 01 edit
1909 02 edit
1909 03 edit
1909 04 edit
1909 05 edit
1909 06 edit
1909 07 edit
1909 08 edit
1909 09 edit
1909 10 edit
1909 11 edit
1909 12 edit

1910s edit

1910 edit

1910 01 edit
1910 02 edit
1910 03 edit
1910 04 edit
1910 05 edit
1910 06 edit
1910 07 edit
1910 08 edit
1910 09 edit
1910 10 edit
1910 11 edit
1910 12 edit

1911 edit

1911 01 edit
1911 02 edit
1911 03 edit
1911 04 edit
1911 05 edit
1911 06 edit
1911 07 edit
1911 08 edit
1911 09 edit
1911 10 edit
1911 11 edit
1911 12 edit

1912 edit

1912 01 edit
1912 02 edit
1912 03 edit
1912 04 edit
1912 05 edit
1912 06 edit
1912 07 edit
1912 08 edit
1912 09 edit
1912 10 edit
1912 11 edit
1912 12 edit

1913 edit

1913 01 edit
1913 02 edit
1913 03 edit
1913 04 edit
1913 05 edit
1913 06 edit
1913 07 edit
1913 08 edit
1913 09 edit
1913 10 edit
1913 11 edit
1913 12 edit

1914 edit

1914 01 edit
1914 02 edit
1914 03 edit
1914 04 edit
1914 05 edit
1914 06 edit
1914 07 edit
1914 08 edit
1914 09 edit
1914 10 edit
1914 11 edit
1914 12 edit

1915 edit

1915 01 edit
1915 02 edit
1915 03 edit
1915 04 edit
1915 05 edit
1915 06 edit
1915 07 edit
1915 08 edit
1915 09 edit
1915 10 edit
1915 11 edit
1915 12 edit

1916 edit

1916 01 edit
1916 02 edit
1916 03 edit
1916 04 edit
1916 05 edit
1916 06 edit
1916 07 edit
1916 08 edit
1916 09 edit
1916 10 edit
1916 11 edit
1916 12 edit

1917 edit

1917 01 edit
1917 02 edit
1917 03 edit
1917 04 edit
1917 05 edit
1917 06 edit
1917 07 edit
1917 08 edit
1917 09 edit
1917 10 edit
1917 11 edit
1917 12 edit

1918 edit

1918 01 edit
1918 02 edit
1918 03 edit
1918 04 edit
1918 05 edit
1918 06 edit
1918 07 edit
1918 08 edit
1918 09 edit
1918 10 edit
1918 11 edit
1918 12 edit

1919 edit

1919 01 edit
1919 02 edit
1919 03 edit
1919 04 edit
1919 05 edit
1919 06 edit
1919 07 edit
1919 08 edit
1919 09 edit
1919 10 edit
1919 11 edit
1919 12 edit

1920s edit

1920 edit

1920 01 edit
1920 02 edit
1920 03 edit
1920 04 edit
1920 05 edit
1920 06 edit
1920 07 edit
1920 08 edit
1920 09 edit
1920 10 edit
1920 11 edit
1920 12 edit

1921 edit

1921 01 edit
1921 02 edit
1921 03 edit
1921 04 edit
1921 05 edit
1921 06 edit
1921 07 edit
1921 08 edit
1921 09 edit
1921 10 edit
1921 11 edit
1921 12 edit

1922 edit

1922 01 edit
1922 02 edit
1922 03 edit
1922 04 edit
1922 05 edit
1922 06 edit
1922 07 edit
1922 08 edit
1922 09 edit
1922 10 edit
1922 11 edit
1922 12 edit

1923 edit

1923 01 edit
1923 02 edit
1923 03 edit
1923 04 edit
1923 05 edit
1923 06 edit
1923 07 edit
1923 08 edit
1923 09 edit
1923 10 edit
1923 11 edit
1923 12 edit

1924 edit

1924 01 edit
1924 02 edit
1924 03 edit
1924 04 edit
1924 05 edit
1924 06 edit
1924 07 edit
1924 08 edit
1924 09 edit
1924 10 edit
1924 11 edit
1924 12 edit

1925 edit

1925 01 edit
1925 02 edit
1925 03 edit
1925 04 edit
1925 05 edit
1925 06 edit
1925 07 edit
1925 08 edit
1925 09 edit
1925 10 edit
1925 11 edit
1925 12 edit

1926 edit

1926 01 edit
1926 02 edit
1926 03 edit
1926 04 edit
1926 05 edit
1926 06 edit
1926 07 edit
1926 08 edit
1926 09 edit
1926 10 edit
1926 11 edit
1926 12 edit

1927 edit

1927 01 edit
1927 02 edit
1927 03 edit
1927 04 edit
1927 05 edit
1927 06 edit
1927 07 edit
1927 08 edit
1927 09 edit
1927 10 edit
1927 11 edit
1927 12 edit

1928 edit

1928 01 edit
1928 02 edit
1928 03 edit
1928 04 edit
1928 05 edit
1928 06 edit
1928 07 edit
1928 08 edit
1928 09 edit
1928 10 edit
1928 11 edit
1928 12 edit

1929 edit

1929 01 edit
1929 02 edit
1929 03 edit
1929 04 edit
1929 05 edit
1929 06 edit
1929 07 edit
1929 08 edit
1929 09 edit
1929 10 edit
1929 11 edit
1929 12 edit

1930s edit

1930 edit

1930 01 edit
1930 02 edit
1930 03 edit
1930 04 edit
1930 05 edit
1930 06 edit
1930 07 edit
1930 08 edit
1930 09 edit
1930 10 edit
1930 11 edit
1930 12 edit

1931 edit

1931 01 edit
1931 02 edit
1931 03 edit
1931 04 edit
1931 05 edit
1931 06 edit
1931 07 edit
1931 08 edit
1931 09 edit
1931 10 edit
1931 11 edit
1931 12 edit

1932 edit

1932 01 edit
1932 02 edit
1932 03 edit
1932 04 edit
1932 05 edit
1932 06 edit
1932 07 edit
1932 08 edit
1932 09 edit
1932 10 edit
1932 11 edit
1932 12 edit

1933 edit

1933 01 edit
1933 02 edit
1933 03 edit
1933 04 edit
1933 05 edit
1933 06 edit
1933 07 edit
1933 08 edit
1933 09 edit
1933 10 edit
1933 11 edit
1933 12 edit

1934 edit

1934 01 edit
1934 02 edit
1934 03 edit
1934 04 edit
1934 05 edit
1934 06 edit
1934 07 edit
1934 08 edit
1934 09 edit
1934 10 edit
1934 11 edit
1934 12 edit

1935 edit

1935 01 edit
1935 02 edit
1935 03 edit
1935 04 edit
1935 05 edit
1935 06 edit
1935 07 edit
1935 08 edit
1935 09 edit
1935 10 edit
1935 11 edit
1935 12 edit

1936 edit

1936 01 edit
1936 02 edit
1936 03 edit
1936 04 edit
1936 05 edit
1936 06 edit
1936 07 edit
1936 08 edit
1936 09 edit
1936 10 edit
1936 11 edit
1936 12 edit

1937 edit

1937 01 edit
1937 02 edit
1937 03 edit
1937 04 edit
1937 05 edit
1937 06 edit
1937 07 edit
1937 08 edit
1937 09 edit
1937 10 edit
1937 11 edit
1937 12 edit

1938 edit

1938 01 edit
1938 02 edit
1938 03 edit
1938 04 edit
1938 05 edit
1938 06 edit
1938 07 edit
1938 08 edit
1938 09 edit
1938 10 edit
1938 11 edit
1938 12 edit

1939 edit

1939 01 edit
1939 02 edit
1939 03 edit
1939 04 edit
1939 05 edit
1939 06 edit
1939 07 edit
1939 08 edit
1939 09 edit
1939 10 edit
1939 11 edit
1939 12 edit

1940s edit

1940 edit

1940 01 edit
1940 02 edit
1940 03 edit
1940 04 edit
1940 05 edit
1940 06 edit
1940 07 edit
1940 08 edit
1940 09 edit
1940 10 edit
1940 11 edit
1940 12 edit

1941 edit

1941 01 edit
1941 02 edit
1941 03 edit
1941 04 edit
1941 05 edit
1941 06 edit
1941 07 edit
1941 08 edit
1941 09 edit
1941 10 edit
1941 11 edit
1941 12 edit

1942 edit

1942 01 edit
1942 02 edit
1942 03 edit
1942 04 edit
1942 05 edit
1942 06 edit
1942 07 edit
1942 08 edit
1942 09 edit
1942 10 edit
1942 11 edit
1942 12 edit

1943 edit

1943 01 edit
1943 02 edit
1943 03 edit
1943 04 edit
1943 05 edit
1943 06 edit
1943 07 edit
1943 08 edit
1943 09 edit
1943 10 edit
1943 11 edit
1943 12 edit

1944 edit

1944 01 edit
1944 02 edit
1944 03 edit
1944 04 edit
1944 05 edit
1944 06 edit
1944 07 edit
1944 08 edit
1944 09 edit
1944 10 edit
1944 11 edit
1944 12 edit

1945 edit

1945 01 edit
1945 02 edit
1945 03 edit
1945 04 edit
1945 05 edit
1945 06 edit
1945 07 edit
1945 08 edit
1945 09 edit
1945 10 edit
1945 11 edit
1945 12 edit

1946 edit

1946 01 edit
1946 02 edit
1946 03 edit
1946 04 edit
1946 05 edit
1946 06 edit
1946 07 edit
1946 08 edit
1946 09 edit
1946 10 edit
1946 11 edit
1946 12 edit

1947 edit

1947 01 edit
1947 02 edit
1947 03 edit
1947 04 edit
1947 05 edit
1947 06 edit
1947 07 edit
1947 08 edit
1947 09 edit
1947 10 edit
1947 11 edit
1947 12 edit

1948 edit

1948 01 edit
1948 02 edit
1948 03 edit
1948 04 edit
1948 05 edit
1948 06 edit
1948 07 edit
1948 08 edit
1948 09 edit
1948 10 edit
1948 11 edit
1948 12 edit

1949 edit

1949 01 edit
1949 02 edit
1949 03 edit
1949 04 edit
1949 05 edit
1949 06 edit
1949 07 edit
1949 08 edit
1949 09 edit
1949 10 edit
1949 11 edit
1949 12 edit

1950s edit

1950 edit

1950 01 edit
1950 02 edit
1950 03 edit
1950 04 edit
1950 05 edit
1950 06 edit
1950 07 edit
1950 08 edit
1950 09 edit
1950 10 edit
1950 11 edit
1950 12 edit

1951 edit

1951 01 edit
1951 02 edit
1951 03 edit
1951 04 edit
1951 05 edit
1951 06 edit
1951 07 edit
1951 08 edit
1951 09 edit
1951 10 edit
1951 11 edit
1951 12 edit

1952 edit

1952 01 edit
1952 02 edit
1952 03 edit
1952 04 edit
1952 05 edit
1952 06 edit
1952 07 edit
1952 08 edit
1952 09 edit
1952 10 edit
1952 11 edit
1952 12 edit

1953 edit

1953 01 edit
1953 02 edit
1953 03 edit
1953 04 edit
1953 05 edit
1953 06 edit
1953 07 edit
1953 08 edit
1953 09 edit
1953 10 edit
1953 11 edit
1953 12 edit

1954 edit

1954 01 edit
1954 02 edit
1954 03 edit
1954 04 edit
1954 05 edit
1954 06 edit
1954 07 edit
1954 08 edit
1954 09 edit
1954 10 edit
1954 11 edit
1954 12 edit

1955 edit

1955 01 edit
1955 02 edit
1955 03 edit
1955 04 edit
1955 05 edit
1955 06 edit
1955 07 edit
1955 08 edit
1955 09 edit
1955 10 edit
1955 11 edit
1955 12 edit

1956 edit

1956 01 edit
1956 02 edit
1956 03 edit
1956 04 edit
1956 05 edit
1956 06 edit
1956 07 edit
1956 08 edit
1956 09 edit
1956 10 edit
1956 11 edit
1956 12 edit

1957 edit

1957 01 edit
1957 02 edit
1957 03 edit
1957 04 edit
1957 05 edit
1957 06 edit
1957 07 edit
1957 08 edit
1957 09 edit
1957 10 edit
1957 11 edit
1957 12 edit

1958 edit

1958 01 edit
1958 02 edit
1958 03 edit
1958 04 edit
1958 05 edit
1958 06 edit
1958 07 edit
1958 08 edit
1958 09 edit
1958 10 edit
1958 11 edit
1958 12 edit

1959 edit

1959 01 edit
1959 02 edit
1959 03 edit
1959 04 edit
1959 05 edit
1959 06 edit
1959 07 edit
1959 08 edit
1959 09 edit
1959 10 edit
1959 11 edit
1959 12 edit

1960s edit

1960 edit

1960 01 edit
1960 02 edit
1960 03 edit
1960 04 edit
1960 05 edit
1960 06 edit
1960 07 edit
1960 08 edit
1960 09 edit
1960 10 edit
1960 11 edit
1960 12 edit

1961 edit

1961 01 edit
1961 02 edit
1961 03 edit
1961 04 edit
1961 05 edit
1961 06 edit
1961 07 edit
1961 08 edit
1961 09 edit
1961 10 edit
1961 11 edit
1961 12 edit

1962 edit

1962 01 edit
1962 02 edit
1962 03 edit
1962 04 edit
1962 05 edit
1962 06 edit
1962 07 edit
1962 08 edit
1962 09 edit
1962 10 edit
1962 11 edit
1962 12 edit

1963 edit

1963 01 edit
1963 02 edit
1963 03 edit
1963 04 edit
1963 05 edit
1963 06 edit
1963 07 edit
1963 08 edit
1963 09 edit
1963 10 edit
1963 11 edit
1963 12 edit

1964 edit

1964 01 edit
1964 02 edit
1964 03 edit
1964 04 edit
1964 05 edit
1964 06 edit
1964 07 edit
1964 08 edit
1964 09 edit
1964 10 edit
1964 11 edit
1964 12 edit

1965 edit

1965 01 edit
1965 02 edit
1965 03 edit
1965 04 edit
1965 05 edit
1965 06 edit
1965 07 edit
1965 08 edit
1965 09 edit
1965 10 edit
1965 11 edit
1965 12 edit

1966 edit

1966 01 edit
1966 02 edit
1966 03 edit
1966 04 edit
1966 05 edit
1966 06 edit
1966 07 edit
1966 08 edit
1966 09 edit
1966 10 edit
1966 11 edit
1966 12 edit

1967 edit

1967 01 edit
1967 02 edit
1967 03 edit
1967 04 edit
1967 05 edit
1965 06 edit
1965 07 edit
1967 08 edit
1967 09 edit
1967 10 edit
1967 11 edit
1967 12 edit

1968 edit

1968 01 edit
1968 02 edit
1968 03 edit
1968 04 edit
1968 05 edit
1968 06 edit
1968 07 edit
1968 08 edit
1968 09 edit
1968 10 edit
1968 11 edit
1968 12 edit

1969 edit

1969 01 edit
1969 02 edit
1969 03 edit
1969 04 edit
1969 05 edit
1969 06 edit
1969 07 edit
1969 08 edit
1969 09 edit
1969 10 edit
1969 11 edit
1969 12 edit

1970s edit

1970 edit

1970 01 edit
1970 02 edit
1970 03 edit
1970 04 edit
1970 05 edit
1970 06 edit
1970 07 edit
1970 08 edit
1970 09 edit
1970 10 edit
1970 11 edit
1970 12 edit

1971 edit

1971 01 edit
1971 02 edit
1971 03 edit
1971 04 edit
1971 05 edit
1971 06 edit
1971 07 edit
1971 08 edit
1971 09 edit
1971 10 edit
1971 11 edit
1971 12 edit

1972 edit

1972 01 edit
1972 02 edit
1972 03 edit
1972 04 edit
1972 05 edit
1972 06 edit
1972 07 edit
1972 08 edit
1972 09 edit
1972 10 edit
1972 11 edit
1972 12 edit

1973 edit

1973 01 edit
1973 02 edit
1973 03 edit
1973 04 edit
1973 05 edit
1973 06 edit
1973 07 edit
1973 08 edit
1973 09 edit
1973 10 edit
1973 11 edit
1973 12 edit

1974 edit

1974 01 edit
1974 02 edit
1974 03 edit
1974 04 edit
1974 05 edit
1974 06 edit
1974 07 edit
1974 08 edit
1974 09 edit
1974 10 edit
1974 11 edit
1974 12 edit

1975 edit

1975 01 edit
1975 02 edit
1975 03 edit
1975 04 edit
1975 05 edit
1975 06 edit
1975 07 edit
1975 08 edit
1975 09 edit
1975 10 edit
1975 11 edit
1975 12 edit

1976 edit

1976 01 edit
1976 02 edit
1976 03 edit
1976 04 edit
1976 05 edit
1976 06 edit
1976 07 edit
1976 08 edit
1976 09 edit
1976 10 edit
1976 11 edit
1976 12 edit

1977 edit

1977 01 edit
1977 02 edit
1977 03 edit
1977 04 edit
1977 05 edit
1975 06 edit
1975 07 edit
1977 08 edit
1977 09 edit
1977 10 edit
1977 11 edit
1977 12 edit

1978 edit

1978 01 edit
1978 02 edit
1978 03 edit
1978 04 edit
1978 05 edit
1978 06 edit
1978 07 edit
1978 08 edit
1978 09 edit
1978 10 edit
1978 11 edit
1978 12 edit

1979 edit

1979 01 edit
1979 02 edit
1979 03 edit
1979 04 edit
1979 05 edit
1979 06 edit
1979 07 edit
1979 08 edit
1979 09 edit
1979 10 edit
1979 11 edit
1979 12 edit

1980s edit

1980 edit

1980 01 edit
1980 02 edit
1980 03 edit
1980 04 edit
1980 05 edit
1980 06 edit
1980 07 edit
1980 08 edit
1980 09 edit
1980 10 edit
1980 11 edit
1980 12 edit

1981 edit

1981 01 edit
1981 02 edit
1981 03 edit
1981 04 edit
1981 05 edit
1981 06 edit
1981 07 edit
1981 08 edit
1981 09 edit
1981 10 edit
1981 11 edit
1981 12 edit

1982 edit

1982 01 edit
1982 02 edit
1982 03 edit
1982 04 edit
1982 05 edit
1982 06 edit
1982 07 edit
1982 08 edit
1982 09 edit
1982 10 edit
1982 11 edit
1982 12 edit

1983 edit

1983 01 edit
1983 02 edit
1983 03 edit
1983 04 edit
1983 05 edit
1983 06 edit
1983 07 edit
1983 08 edit
1983 09 edit
1983 10 edit
1983 11 edit
1983 12 edit

1984 edit

1984 01 edit
1984 02 edit
1984 03 edit
1984 04 edit
1984 05 edit
1984 06 edit
1984 07 edit
1984 08 edit
1984 09 edit
1984 10 edit
1984 11 edit
1984 12 edit

1985 edit

1985 01 edit
1985 02 edit
1985 03 edit
1985 04 edit
1985 05 edit
1985 06 edit
1985 07 edit
1985 08 edit
1985 09 edit
1985 10 edit
1985 11 edit
1985 12 edit

1986 edit

1986 01 edit
1986 02 edit
1986 03 edit
1986 04 edit
1986 05 edit
1986 06 edit
1986 07 edit
1986 08 edit
1986 09 edit
1986 10 edit
1986 11 edit
1986 12 edit

1987 edit

1987 01 edit
1987 02 edit
1987 03 edit
1987 04 edit
1987 05 edit
1985 06 edit
1985 07 edit
1987 08 edit
1987 09 edit
1987 10 edit
1987 11 edit
1987 12 edit

1988 edit

1988 01 edit
1988 02 edit
1988 03 edit
1988 04 edit
1988 05 edit
1988 06 edit
1988 07 edit
1988 08 edit
1988 09 edit
1988 10 edit
1988 11 edit
1988 12 edit

1989 edit

1989 01 edit
1989 02 edit
1989 03 edit
1989 04 edit
1989 05 edit
1989 06 edit
1989 07 edit
1989 08 edit
1989 09 edit
1989 10 edit
1989 11 edit
1989 12 edit

1990s edit

1990 edit

1990 01 edit
1990 02 edit
1990 03 edit
1990 04 edit
1990 05 edit
1990 06 edit
1990 07 edit
1990 08 edit
1990 09 edit
1990 10 edit
1990 11 edit
1990 12 edit

1991 edit

1991 01 edit
1991 02 edit
1991 03 edit
1991 04 edit
1991 05 edit
1991 06 edit
1991 07 edit
1991 08 edit
1991 09 edit
1991 10 edit
1991 11 edit
1991 12 edit

1992 edit

1992 01 edit
1992 02 edit
1992 03 edit
1992 04 edit
1992 05 edit
1992 06 edit
1992 07 edit
1992 08 edit
1992 09 edit
1992 10 edit
1992 11 edit
1992 12 edit

1993 edit

1993 01 edit
1993 02 edit
1993 03 edit
1993 04 edit
1993 05 edit
1993 06 edit
1993 07 edit
1993 08 edit
1993 09 edit
1993 10 edit
1993 11 edit
1993 12 edit

1994 edit

1994 01 edit
1994 02 edit
1994 03 edit
1994 04 edit
1994 05 edit
1994 06 edit
1994 07 edit
1994 08 edit
1994 09 edit
1994 10 edit
1994 11 edit
1994 12 edit

1995 edit

1995 01 edit
1995 02 edit
1995 03 edit
1995 04 edit
1995 05 edit
1995 06 edit
1995 07 edit
1995 08 edit
1995 09 edit
1995 10 edit
1995 11 edit
1995 12 edit

1996 edit

1996 01 edit
1996 02 edit
1996 03 edit
1996 04 edit
1996 05 edit
1996 06 edit
1996 07 edit
1996 08 edit
1996 09 edit
1996 10 edit
1996 11 edit
1996 12 edit

1997 edit

1997 01 edit
1997 02 edit
1997 03 edit
1997 04 edit
1997 05 edit
1995 06 edit
1995 07 edit
1997 08 edit
1997 09 edit
1997 10 edit
1997 11 edit
1997 12 edit

1998 edit

1998 01 edit
1998 02 edit
1998 03 edit
1998 04 edit
1998 05 edit
1998 06 edit
1998 07 edit
1998 08 edit
1998 09 edit
1998 10 edit
1998 11 edit
1998 12 edit

1999 edit

1999 01 edit
1999 02 edit
1999 03 edit
1999 04 edit
1999 05 edit
1999 06 edit
1999 07 edit
1999 08 edit
1999 09 edit
1999 10 edit
1999 11 edit
1999 12 edit

2000s edit

2000 edit

2000 01 edit
2000 02 edit
2000 03 edit
2000 04 edit
2000 05 edit
2000 06 edit
2000 07 edit
2000 08 edit
2000 09 edit
2000 10 edit
2000 11 edit
2000 12 edit

2001 edit

2001 01 edit
2001 02 edit
2001 03 edit
2001 04 edit
2001 05 edit
2001 06 edit
2001 07 edit
2001 08 edit
2001 09 edit
2001 10 edit
2001 11 edit
2001 12 edit

2002 edit

2002 01 edit
2002 02 edit
2002 03 edit
2002 04 edit
2002 05 edit
2002 06 edit
2002 07 edit
2002 08 edit
2002 09 edit
2002 10 edit
2002 11 edit
2002 12 edit

2003 edit

2003 01 edit
2003 02 edit
2003 03 edit
2003 04 edit
2003 05 edit
2003 06 edit
2003 07 edit
2003 08 edit
2003 09 edit
2003 10 edit
2003 11 edit
2003 12 edit

2004 edit

2004 01 edit
2004 02 edit
2004 03 edit
2004 04 edit
2004 05 edit
2004 06 edit
2004 07 edit
2004 08 edit
2004 09 edit
2004 10 edit
2004 11 edit
2004 12 edit

2005 edit

2005 01 edit
2005 02 edit
2005 03 edit
2005 04 edit
2005 05 edit
2005 06 edit
2005 07 edit
2005 08 edit
2005 09 edit
2005 10 edit
2005 11 edit
2005 12 edit

2006 edit

2006 01 edit
2006 02 edit
2006 03 edit
2006 04 edit
2006 05 edit
2006 06 edit
2006 07 edit
2006 08 edit
2006 09 edit
2006 10 edit
2006 11 edit
2006 12 edit

2007 edit

2007 01 edit
2007 02 edit
2007 03 edit
2007 04 edit
2007 05 edit
2005 06 edit
2005 07 edit
2007 08 edit
2007 09 edit
2007 10 edit
2007 11 edit
2007 12 edit

2008 edit

2008 01 edit
2008 02 edit
2008 03 edit
2008 04 edit
2008 05 edit
2008 06 edit
2008 07 edit
2008 08 edit
2008 09 edit
2008 10 edit
2008 11 edit
2008 12 edit

2009 edit

2009 01 edit
2009 02 edit
2009 03 edit
2009 04 edit
2009 05 edit
2009 06 edit
2009 07 edit
2009 08 edit
2009 09 edit
2009 10 edit
2009 11 edit
2009 12 edit

2010s edit

2010 edit

2010 01 edit
2010 02 edit
2010 03 edit
2010 04 edit
2010 05 edit
2010 06 edit
2010 07 edit
2010 08 edit
2010 09 edit
2010 10 edit
2010 11 edit
2010 12 edit

2011 edit

2011 01 edit
2011 02 edit
2011 03 edit
2011 04 edit
2011 05 edit
2011 06 edit
2011 07 edit
2011 08 edit
2011 09 edit
2011 10 edit
2011 11 edit
2011 12 edit

2012 edit

2012 01 edit
2012 02 edit
2012 03 edit
2012 04 edit
2012 05 edit
2012 06 edit
2012 07 edit
2012 08 edit
2012 09 edit
2012 10 edit
2012 11 edit
2012 12 edit

2013 edit

2013 01 edit
2013 02 edit
2013 03 edit
2013 04 edit
2013 05 edit
2013 06 edit
2013 07 edit
2013 08 edit
2013 09 edit
2013 10 edit
2013 11 edit
2013 12 edit

2014 edit

2014 01 edit
2014 02 edit
2014 03 edit
2014 04 edit
2014 05 edit
2014 06 edit
2014 07 edit
2014 08 edit
2014 09 edit
2014 10 edit
2014 11 edit
2014 12 edit

2015 edit

2015 01 edit
2015 02 edit
2015 03 edit
2015 04 edit
2015 05 edit
2015 06 edit
2015 07 edit
2015 08 edit
2015 09 edit
2015 10 edit
2015 11 edit
2015 12 edit

2016 edit

2016 01 edit
2016 02 edit
2016 03 edit
2016 04 edit
2016 05 edit
2016 06 edit
2016 07 edit
2016 08 edit
2016 09 edit
2016 10 edit
2016 11 edit
2016 12 edit

2017 edit

2017 01 edit
2017 02 edit
2017 03 edit
2017 04 edit
2017 05 edit
2015 06 edit
2015 07 edit
2017 08 edit
2017 09 edit
2017 10 edit
2017 11 edit
2017 12 edit

2018 edit

2018 01 edit
2018 02 edit
2018 03 edit
2018 04 edit
2018 05 edit
2018 06 edit
2018 07 edit
2018 08 edit
2018 09 edit
2018 10 edit
2018 11 edit
2018 12 edit

2019 edit

2019 01 edit
2019 02 edit
2019 03 edit
2019 04 edit
2019 05 edit
2019 06 edit
2019 07 edit
2019 08 edit
2019 09 edit
2019 10 edit
2019 11 edit
2019 12 edit

2020s edit

2020 edit

2020 01 edit
2020 02 edit
2020 03 edit
2020 04 edit
2020 05 edit
2020 06 edit
2020 07 edit
2020 08 edit
2020 09 edit
2020 10 edit
2020 11 edit
2020 12 edit

2021 edit

2021 01 edit
2021 02 edit
2021 03 edit
2021 04 edit
2021 05 edit
2021 06 edit
2021 07 edit
2021 08 edit
2021 09 edit
2021 10 edit
2021 11 edit
2021 12 edit

2022 edit

2022 01 edit
2022 02 edit
2022 03 edit
2022 04 edit
2022 05 edit
2022 06 edit
2022 07 edit
2022 08 edit
2022 09 edit
2022 10 edit
2022 11 edit
2022 12 edit

2023 edit

2023 01 edit
2023 02 edit
2023 03 edit
2023 04 edit
2023 05 edit
2023 06 edit
2023 07 edit
2023 08 edit
2023 09 edit
2023 10 edit
2023 11 edit
2023 12 edit

2024 edit

2024 01 edit
2024 02 edit
2024 03 edit
2024 04 edit
2024 05 edit
2024 06 edit
2024 07 edit
2024 08 edit
2024 09 edit
2024 10 edit
2024 11 edit
2024 12 edit

2025 edit

2025 01 edit
2025 02 edit
2025 03 edit
2025 04 edit
2025 05 edit
2025 06 edit
2025 07 edit
2025 08 edit
2025 09 edit
2025 10 edit
2025 11 edit
2025 12 edit

2026 edit

2026 01 edit
2026 02 edit
2026 03 edit
2026 04 edit
2026 05 edit
2026 06 edit
2026 07 edit
2026 08 edit
2026 09 edit
2026 10 edit
2026 11 edit
2026 12 edit

2027 edit

2027 01 edit
2027 02 edit
2027 03 edit
2027 04 edit
2027 05 edit
2025 06 edit
2025 07 edit
2027 08 edit
2027 09 edit
2027 10 edit
2027 11 edit
2027 12 edit

2028 edit

2028 01 edit
2028 02 edit
2028 03 edit
2028 04 edit
2028 05 edit
2028 06 edit
2028 07 edit
2028 08 edit
2028 09 edit
2028 10 edit
2028 11 edit
2028 12 edit

2029 edit

2029 01 edit
2029 02 edit
2029 03 edit
2029 04 edit
2029 05 edit
2029 06 edit
2029 07 edit
2029 08 edit
2029 09 edit
2029 10 edit
2029 11 edit
2029 12 edit

References edit

  1. "SOCIAL.". The Daily Telegraph (New South Wales, Australia) (5472): p. 14. 2 January 1897. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article238419976. Retrieved 30 December 2020. 
  2. "THE STAGE". The Ballarat Star (Victoria, Australia) 50, (15170): p. 2. 17 December 1904. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article208879733. Retrieved 29 December 2020. 
  3. "WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY.". The Age (Victoria, Australia) (15,666): p. 5. 26 May 1905. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article198590748. Retrieved 29 December 2020. 
  4. "NEWS OF THE DAY.". The Age (Victoria, Australia) (15,667): p. 8. 27 May 1905. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article198599775. Retrieved 29 December 2020. 
  5. "COMMONWEALTH NOTES.". The Register (Adelaide) (South Australia) LXX, (18,264): p. 9. 27 May 1905. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article56674474. Retrieved 29 December 2020. 
  6. "WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY FOR AUSTRALIA.". Sunday Times (New South Wales, Australia) (1010): p. 5. 28 May 1905. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article125866171. Retrieved 29 December 2020. 
  7. "COMMONWEALTH NOTES.". The Register (Adelaide) (South Australia) LXX, (18,266): p. 8. 30 May 1905. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article56676092. Retrieved 29 December 2020. 
  8. "CHEAP AND WIRELESS.". Evening News (New South Wales, Australia) (11,848): p. 4. 31 May 1905. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article114055574. Retrieved 29 December 2020. 
  9. "WIRELESS SYSTEM OF TELEGRAPHY.". The Daily Telegraph (New South Wales, Australia) (8112): p. 12. 3 June 1905. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article239518389. Retrieved 30 December 2020. 
  10. "STATE GOVERNOR.". Sunday Times (New South Wales, Australia) (1011): p. 3. 4 June 1905. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article125866691. Retrieved 30 December 2020. 
  11. "WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY SCHEME.". The Daily Telegraph (New South Wales, Australia) (8113): p. 5. 5 June 1905. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article239502309. Retrieved 30 December 2020. 
  12. "WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY.". The Daily Telegraph (New South Wales, Australia) (8113): p. 4. 5 June 1905. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article239502162. Retrieved 30 December 2020. 
  13. "WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY.". The Brisbane Courier (Queensland, Australia) LXI, (14,789): p. 4. 6 June 1905. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article19349906. Retrieved 30 December 2020. 
  14. "WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY.". The Daily Telegraph (New South Wales, Australia) (8141): p. 5. 7 July 1905. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article237684158. Retrieved 30 December 2020. 
  15. "WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY.". Evening News (New South Wales, Australia) (11,880): p. 4. 7 July 1905. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article114470551. Retrieved 30 December 2020. 
  16. "WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY.". The Sydney Morning Herald (New South Wales, Australia) (21,016): p. 15. 15 July 1905. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article14685364. Retrieved 30 December 2020. 
  17. "WIRELESS TELEGRAPH.". The Sydney Morning Herald (New South Wales, Australia) (21,018): p. 8. 18 July 1905. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article14680806. Retrieved 30 December 2020.