Chess Opening Theory/1. e4/1...d5

Scandinavian defence
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h

Position in Forsyth-Edwards Notation (FEN)
Moves: 1. e4 d5
ECO code: B01
Parent: King's pawn opening

1... d5 · Scandinavian defence

edit

Black takes on White's centre head on. They are determined to disrupt White's centre and immediately open up the board, even if they have to give up their own hopes of big centre and some tempo to do it.

White could trade the pawn, defend it, or gambit it. 1...d5 is a very forcing response: almost invariably White captures, their plans derailed.

Trade the pawn

edit

2. exd5 is almost always played. It's in White's interest to trade pawns, so they rarely do otherwise.

Usually Black recaptures with 2...Qxd5. This exposes chief drawback of the Scandinavian. Developing one's queen too early makes it a vulnerability, and White can develop 3. Nc3 while gaining tempo on it. For this reason, the modern variation follows up with 2...Nf6, intending to trade off knights first so that 4...Qxd5 can't be met with 5. Nc3.

Defend the pawn

edit

Trying to defend the e pawn comes with trade offs, ranging from small (2. d3?! or 2. Nc3?!) to severe (2...f3?).

  • 2. d3?! lets Black trade pawns then queens, and White loses the right to castle 2... dxe4 3. dxe4 Qxd1 4. Kxd1. Black's achieved equality and the nice open position they wanted but the game is drawish. After 2... dxe4, White can play 3. Nc3!? exd3 4. Bxe3, giving up all their central pawns for some development and transposing into something called the Dunst-Perrenet Gambit.
  • 2. Nc3?! allows 2...d4, kicking White's knight. 3. Nce2 e5 and Black has a strong centre while White is cramped.
  • 2. f3? defends e4 but is very unpleasant for White. If White intends 2... dxe4 3. fxe4, they may avoid the Scandinavian but at the cost of a weakened kingside. However, Black can play 2...e5, leaving the tension, and White's position is awful: they can't play Nf3 because their pawn is there, the king's bishop has no good squares, and Nc3 will be met by d4. White should probably play exd5 anyway, and end up the Scandinavian game they were wanting to avoid, but now they've played f3.
  • 2. e5?! to avoid the pawn trade allows Black to clamp down on d4 with 2...c5, and/or play Bf4 then e6, achieving a superior French defence structure without its passive bishop.

Gambit the pawn

edit

If White really wants to avoid the Scandinavian, then they'd do better to gambit the pawn instead.

  • 2. d4 transposes into the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit, usually seen after 1.d4 d5. It has some chance of leading Black awry if they do not play 1...d5 against 1.d4. If Black prefers to decline the gambit, they can steer the game into the French, Caro-Kann, or Nimzovich defences.
  • 2. Nf3 is the Tennison Gambit. At first it looks like a pre-move mistake, as 2... dxe4 will kick the knight. One plan for White is to win the pawn back only after getting ahead in development thanks to the threat on f7 (3. Ng3 (targets e4 and f7) Nf6?! (defends e4) 4. Bc4 (double attack on f7) e6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Ngxe4). Another plan is the internet-famous Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Gambit.

Bad moves

edit
  • 2. c3? allows White to regain the pawn after 2... dxe4 3. Qa4+. White decides that they would rather have their queen bullied about the board to give Black free tempi: 3...Nc6 4. Qxe4 Nf6 5. Qa4 and White is way behind in development.
  • 2. g4? is called the Zilbermints Gambit.

History

edit
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
Position after 1.e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. d4 Nf6 5. Nf3 c6 6. Bd2 Bf5

The Scandinavian, or Centre-counter defence, is one of the oldest chess openings, described in a 15th Century Valencian poem. In the 20th century, Bent Larsen revived the opening and defeated Anatoly Karpov with it in 1979.[1]

Its appeal to modern players is two-fold: firstly, 1...d5 is very forcing. Whereas with 1...e5, say, Black must be prepared to face a host of openings at White's choosing (the Italian, Spanish, Vienna, King's Gambit and so on), after 1...d5 2. exd5 almost always occurs so Black dictates the course of play. They may reliably reach 2...Qxd4 3. Nc3 Qa4 almost every time they face 1. e4 if they choose.

Secondly is the character of the typical Scandinavian pawn structure, which results in quieter and easy play for Black. Matthias Wahls writes on the popularity of the Scandinavian,[2]

In the majority of all cases, the same standard pawn centre appears with a white pawn on d4 and black pawns on e6 and c6. The stability of this pawn constellation confers a static character on the position. Sharp, forcing lines are the exception. The Scandinavian is unquestionably a model opening... You can also steer the course through the opening moves relatively easily without extensive theoretical knowledge, simply by making use of patterns and structural rules.

Theory table

edit

For explanation of theory tables, see theory table and for notation, see algebraic notation.

1. e4 d5

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Scandinavian defence, main line exd5
Qxd5
Nc3
Qa5
d4
Nf6
Nf3
c6
Bd2
Bf5
=
Lasker variation ...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Bg4
h3
Qh5?
hxg4
Qxh1
Ne2
Nxg4
Ng3
Qxf1+
Nxf1 +−
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Bh5
g4
Bg6
Ne5
Nbd7
Nc4 ±
Leonhardt gambit ...
...
...
...
b4!?
Qxb4
Rb1
Qd6
d4
Nf6
Nf3 =
...
...
...
...
...
...
Nb5
Qa5
Bc4
c6??
Bxf7+
Kxf7
Qh5+
g6
Nd6+
exd6
Qxa5 +-
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Nf6
Modern Scandinavian ...
Nf6
d4
Marshall variation ...
...
...
Nxd5
Nf3
Bf5
Bd3
Bxd3
Qxd3
e6
O-O
Richter variation ...
...
...
...
...
g6
c4
Nb6
Nc3
Bg7
Be2
O-O
O-O
Gipslis variation ...
...
...
...
...
Bg4
Be2
e6
O-O
Nc6
c4
Nb6
Nc3
Be7
d5
Portuguese gambit ...
...
...
Bg4
f3
Bf5
...
...
Nc3?!
Nxd5
Nxd5
Qxd5
d4 =
Blackburne-Kloosterboer gambit ...
c6
Tennison gambit Nf3
dxe4
Ng5
Nf6
Bc4
e6
Nc3
Qd4
Qe2 =
Intercontinental ballistic missile
gambit accepted
...
...
...
...
d3
exd3
Bxd3
h6??
Nxf7
Kxf7
Bg6+
Kxg6
Qxd8 +/-
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
e5??
Bb5+
c6
Qxd8+
Kxd8
Nxf7+ +/-
Blackmar-Diemer transposition d4
dxe4
Nc3
Nf6
f3
exf3
Nxf3
g6
Bc4
Bg7
Ryder gambit ...
...
...
...
...
...
Qxf3!?
Qxd4

When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.

References

edit
  1. Anatoly Karpov vs Bent Larsen, Montreal (1979). Chessgames.com
  2. Wahls, Matthias; Muller, Karsten; Langrock, Hannes (2011). The Modern Scandinavian. Alkmaar: New In Chess. ISBN 9789056913441.
  • Nunn's Chess Openings. 1999. John Nunn (Editor), Graham Burgess, John Emms, Joe Gallagher. ISBN 1-8574-4221-0.