Polish Opening
a b c d e f g h
8a8 black rookb8 black knightc8 black bishopd8 black queene8 black kingf8 black bishopg8 black knighth8 black rook8
7a7 black pawnb7 black pawnc7 black pawnd7 black pawne7 black pawnf7 black pawng7 black pawnh7 black pawn7
6a6 black kingb6 black kingc6 black kingd6 black kinge6 black kingf6 black kingg6 black kingh6 black king6
5a5 black kingb5 black kingc5 black kingd5 black kinge5 black kingf5 black kingg5 black kingh5 black king5
4a4 black kingb4 white pawnc4 black kingd4 black kinge4 black kingf4 black kingg4 black kingh4 black king4
3a3 black kingb3 black kingc3 black kingd3 black kinge3 black kingf3 black kingg3 black kingh3 black king3
2a2 white pawnb2 black kingc2 white pawnd2 white pawne2 white pawnf2 white pawng2 white pawnh2 white pawn2
1a1 white rookb1 white knightc1 white bishopd1 white queene1 white kingf1 white bishopg1 white knighth1 white rook1
a b c d e f g h
Position in Forsyth-Edwards Notation (FEN)
Moves: 1. b4
ECO code: A00
Parent: Starting position

1. b4 · Polish Opening

edit

The Polish Opening is a flank and rather uncommon opening starting with the move 1. b4. The purpose of this move is to fight for a spatial advantage on the queenside instead of immediately taking control of the centre. White will claim their share of the centre after getting the queen’s bishop fianchettoed and an eventual pawn advance in the centre. The move b4 can always be played later in the game which is the reason why this opening is seldom seen nowadays, however, Tartakower and Magnus Carlsen have tried it in tournaments and won successfully. The Polish opening is classified under the code (A00) as an irregular opening.

  • Fianchettoing is often a good idea. Why not grab a little space?
  • At some point a quick b4-b5 might dislodge a knight on c6.
  • Trading the b-pawn for the c-pawn may give white central power.
  • If Black responds with 1...e5 or 1...e6, usual play either continues with 2. a3, defending the pawn, or 2. Bb2, fianchettoing the bishop on the powerful a1-h8 diagonal. The idea after Bb2 is that the black can't play Bxb4 right away. For example, after 1. b4 e6 2. Bb2 Bxb4??, White responds with 3. Bxg7, at which point Black loses a rook. However, 1. b4 e5 2. Bb2 Bxb4!? 3. Bxe5 is actually viable for Black, in spite of the fact that Black cedes White a central pawn majority. The second player will usually obtain some form of compensation with a slight lead in development. Chances for both sides in these lines are around equal, with perhaps a very slight edge for White.
  • Another possibility is for White to advance their b-pawn with b5, so as to evade attack. This has been shown to be a good option in several lines, and White now has a clear spatial advantage on the queenside. On the other hand, White’s pawn is now overextended and difficult to protect. Once again, the positions resulting from these lines are generally equal.

Statistics

edit

www.chess.com's Game Explorer Master Games DB shows 1704 games with 1. b4:

White wins 37%, 41% are drawn and Black wins 22% of all games.

www.365chess.com's Big Database shows 6360 games with 1. b4:

White wins 33%, 26% are drawn and Black wins 41%.

ChessBase's Big Database 2010 has 14,389 games with 1. b4 giving White a 47.6% winning percentage - which is very bad when compared to White's winning percentages with 1. e4 (53%) 1. d4 and 1. c4 (+54%) and 1. Nf3 (55%).

The Big Database has 291 games (out of almost 5.5 million) played with at least one player having a FIDE rating of 2400 or higher. The winning percentages for these games are: White 46%, Drawn 30%, Black 24%.

The average FIDE rating of all players is 1926, the average performance rating is 1942 which again compares unfavorably with the average ratings of all players employing 1. d4, 1. Nf3, 1. c4 and the average performance ratings of these openings (both categories are +2200).

The average rating of all players employing 1. e4 in the DB is 2135 with an average performance rating of 2161.

Few Grandmasters (GMs) employ this opening in serious games. GMs Ivanchuk and Fischer played it three times – in simultaneous exhibitions. GMs Hort, Ljubojevic, Miles, Petrosian and Smyslov played it at least once against fellow GMs or IMs (International Masters); Larsen played it in at least 4 serious games.

Surprisingly enough, there are a few fairly recent books on this opening. None are by GMs (although two are by IMs).

Play 1.b4! Shock your Opponents with the Sokolsky Language: English by IM Yury Lapshun, Nick Conticello Everyman Chess, 2008, PB

1.b4: Theory & Practice of the Sokolsky Opening Full of Fresh Analysis by Jerzy Konikowski, Marek Soszynski Russell Enterprises, 2009, PB - English

The Sokolsky 1.b4 (Orangutan) Foxy 106 by IM Andrew Martin ChessOnDVD, 2010, DVD Language: English

In theory and practice, Black usually responds by playing in the center with 1...d5, or by exploiting the weak position of the pawn by playing 1...e5 or 1...e6. The flexible 1...Nf6 has been played as well. A great many other less common replies are known, ranging from the sensible but slightly eccentric Outflank Variation (1. b4 c6), to the stupid Tuebingen Variation (1. b4 Nh6?!), even this being shown to give White no more than a slight advantage.

Further reading: http://www.chess.com/article/view/openings-for-tactical-players-sokolsky-opening IM Tim Harding "Significant Games in the Sokolsky Opening" http://www.chesscafe.com/text/kibitz86.pdf http://www.chesscafe.com/text/lane140.pdf

Theory table

edit

1. b4

1 2 3
1 b4
e5
Bb2
Bxb4
Bxe5
Nf6
+/=
1 ...
...
a3
d5
Bb2
a5
=
2 ...
d5
Bb2
Nf6
e3
e6
=
3 ...
Nf6
Bb2
e6

=
Outflank Variation ...
c6
Bb2
a5

=
...
...
...
d5

=
Birmingham Gambit ...
c5
bxc5
e5

+/=
...
...
a3
cxb4

=

All possible Black's moves

edit
Quick
Navigation
Na6
a6
a5

b6
b5
Nc6
c6
c5

d6
d5

e6
e5
Nf6
f6
f5

g6
g5
Nh6
h6
h5

References

edit
  • Eric Schiller (2002). Unorthodox Chess Openings (Second Edition ed.). Cardoza. ISBN 1-58042-072-9. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help)
  • Kasparov, Garry, & Keene, Raymond 1989 Batsford chess openings 2. ISBN 0-8050-3409-9.


For explanation of theory tables, see theory table and for notation, see algebraic notation.

When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.