Acing the SQE/Contract Law

Core principles of contract law

edit

Formation

edit

In English contract law, formation refers to the creation of a legally binding agreement between two or more parties. For a contract to be valid and enforceable, it must satisfy several key elements. These elements are:

offer and acceptance

edit

An offer is a clear, unequivocal proposal made by one party (the offeror) to another (the offeree) with the intention of being bound by it once the offeree accepts. • The offer must be specific and capable of acceptance. • Offers can be terminated through rejection, revocation, lapse of time, or counteroffer. Acceptance

• Acceptance is an unqualified agreement to the terms of the offer. • It must be communicated clearly, either explicitly (e.g., verbally or in writing) or implicitly (e.g., through conduct). • Acceptance must mirror the terms of the offer (the “mirror image rule”). Any variation might constitute a counteroffer rather than acceptance.

Some leading cases are: • Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893): Demonstrates offer and acceptance in a unilateral contract. Hyde v Wrench (1840): Establishes the mirror image rule and the effect of a counteroffer. • Currie v Misa (1875): Defines consideration as a detriment to the promisee or a benefit to the promisor.

consideration

edit

Consideration refers to the “price” paid for the promise made in the contract. It involves an exchange of value, such as money, services, goods, or promises. • It must be sufficient but need not be adequate. For example, a small or nominal consideration can suffice, but it must have some value in law. • Past consideration (an act performed before the promise is made) is generally not valid, except in specific exceptions.

edit

• The parties must intend for their agreement to have legal consequences. • In commercial agreements, there is a presumption of intent to create legal relations, unless expressly stated otherwise. • In social or domestic arrangements, there is usually no such presumption unless evidence shows otherwise.

certainty

edit

• The terms of the agreement must be clear and complete enough for the court to enforce. • Ambiguities or omissions in key terms may render the contract void.

capacity

edit

The parties entering the contract must have the legal capacity to do so (e.g., they must be of sound mind and not minors, with some exceptions for necessities).

Parties

edit

privity of contract

edit

rights of third parties

edit

Contract terms

edit

express terms

edit

incorporation of terms

edit

terms implied by common law and statute

edit

exemption clauses

edit

Section 3 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) will apply and the exemption clause will be valid if reasonable (reasonableness test).

the interpretation of contract terms (conditions, warranties and innominate terms)

edit

variation

edit

Vitiating factors

edit

misrepresentation

edit

mistake

edit

unfair contract terms

edit

duress and undue influence

edit

illegality

edit

Termination

edit

expiry or other specified event

edit

breach

edit

frustration

edit

basic principles of restitution and unjust enrichment in the context of termination of contract

edit

Remedies

edit

damages

edit

liquidated sums and penalties

edit

specific performance

edit

injunctions

edit

duty to mitigate

edit

indemnities

edit

guarantees

edit

Causation and remoteness

edit