User:HumbleBeauty/Proof of monism peer review3

This manuscript has been peer reviewed by Christopher Michael Langan (CTMU), and Jonathan Richard Emerson (the G proof[4]), and by numerous atheists and agnostics across the internet; such as on myspace religion and philosophy forum, facebook groups, and on paltalk.

sole Author: Mars Sterling Turner

Abstract

Proof of monism is a work of Mars Sterling Turner that includes the proof of the scientific laws of monism, and the pragmatic proof of monism. Two separate epistemologies are used as a method of proof; scientism, and pragmatism.

Introduction

Scientific laws of monism

energy is eternal

proof; ∑E = Ek+Ep

∑E, the sum of energy

Ek, kinetic energy

Ep, potential energy

Scientific Law (1); Conservation of energy; energy cannot be created nor destroyed.

energy cannot be created

ergo by time reversal symmetry it is a scientific law that energy never was created

ergo energy cannot be created, never was created, energy exists and yet cannot be destroyed,

ergo it is a scientific law that energy is eternal. Q.E.D.

energy is omnipresent

E/c^2 = m

proof; E = m c^2;

E, energy

c, speed of light

m, mass

Scientific Law (2); mass - energy equivalence;

"Are not the gross bodies and light convertible into one another and may not Bodies receive much of their Activity from the Particles of Light which enter their Composition?"-Isaac Newton.

Electromagnetic radiation and matter are convertible into one another; in other words its a scientific law that energy is omnipresent. QED

energy is all-power-full

ΔE = ΔE

ΔE/Δt = ΔE/Δt

ΔP = ΔE/Δt; axiom 1

ΔP = ΔE/Δs Δs/Δt

∇E = ΔE/Δs; axiom 2

ΔP = ∇E Δs/Δt

Δs/Δt = Δv; axiom 3

ΔP = ∇E Δv

dP = ∇E dv

∫dP = ∫ ∇E dv

proof; P = ∫ ∇E dv

E, energy

P, power

Δ, increment

d, derivative

∫, integral

∇, gradient

t, time

s, space

Scientific Law (3); Power is the transformation of energy over space and time.

All expressions of power are transformations of energy

ergo it is a scientific law that eternal and omnipresent energy [S1 & S2] is all-power-full Q.E.D.

monism exists

Proof--It is a scientific law that energy is eternal and omnipresent [S1 & S2]. It is a scientific law that eternal and omnipresent energy is all-power-full [S3]. Eternal, omnipresent, all-power-full, energy is a monism. Q.E.D.

Pragmatic proof of monism

resolved paradox of omnipotence

Power is defined as the transformation of energy, not the destruction of energy. The inability to destroy itself does not contradict being all-power-full. Therefore energy cannot destroy itself.

To create and to lift both involve the transformation of energy. The monism may be an infinite energy (zero point energy) and a rock which has finite form cannot exist in an infinite substantial state. Therefore the monism cannot create a rock that it cannot lift.

Therefore the monism is natural.

Note; Resolving the omnipotence paradox demonstrates a clarified understanding of reality.

This pragmatically proves that monism exists. Therefore it is a scientific law that monism exists. QED

Discussion

alternative views

Physicalism

resolved problem of the non-physical

Define "physical";

By physical, does one mean 3-space local realism at no greater than the speed of light?

Such that the following are non-physical;

(1) any spacial dimensions higher than 3

(2) non-locality and quantum entanglement

(3) superluminal speed and negative refractive index

Or by "physical" does one equivocate to mean "natural"?

The monism is natural.

Dualism

dual aspect monism

So you have the physical and non-physical and both are made of the same thing; energy

Nihilism

nothing is not

my rebuttal to ontological nihilism is these logical tautologies;

nothing is not, nothing is nothing, nothing equals nothing, nothing implies nothing, nothing has the property of nothing, nothing exists as nothing, nothing is the cause of nothing, nowhere and at no time has nothing existed, nothing is made of nothing, nothing is in nothing, nothing is nonexistence.

Epistemology of proofs; Methods

This work uses the following two epistemologies as methods of inquiry; scientism, and pragmatism.

Scientism

(where you use scientific laws as axioms to deduce more scientific laws), and

Pragmatism

(where you merely show the utility of something; that it is useful).