# Scheme Programming/Abstractions with Data

### Introduction to Complex NumbersEdit

In order to show how abstractions with data can be built, we're going to go through making a complex number package. A complex number is one that has 2 parts, a real part, and an imaginary part. They are often written in one of two ways, in rectangular form:

And in polar form:

Now, we can can do all of the usual arithmetic with complex numbers, addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. There are simple formulae for this;

Addition:

Subtraction:

Multiplication:

Division:

Note how multiplication and division are best expressed in polar form, while addition and subtraction are best expressed in rectangular form. This raises an interesting question: How does one best go about computing these? Do we have one internal representation? If so, which do we choose? There are a large amount of questions. These can be answered by trying to implement a new type of data: the complex number type.

### Creating our Generic 'Typed' VariableEdit

Firstly, we shall create a generic 'Typed' variable:

```
(define typed-variable
(lambda (type value)
(cons 'Typed (list type value))
)
)
```

We now need a way to tell if a given variable has a type:

```
(define typed?
(lambda (var)
(and (list? var) (= 'Typed (car var)))
)
)
```

Now, we've introduced two important concepts here, a 'Predicate' and a 'Constructor'. The first is a construct to find if some data is of the correct form, and the second is a procedure that builds our data structure for us.

We must have a way of extracting our data (in this case, the type) from this structure, a way of 'selecting' it:

```
(define type-of
(lambda (var)
(if (typed? var)
(car (cdr var)
)
)
)
```

### Creating our Complex Number Data TypeEdit

#### Building our ConstructorsEdit

Using this typed value, we can go on to form a more detailed data structure for out complex number:

```
(define complex-rect
(lambda (a b)
(typed-variable 'Rect-Complex (list a b))
)
)
```

Now let's continue, and create a `complex-polar`

:

```
(define complex-polar
(lambda (r thet)
(typed-variable 'Polar-Complex (list r thet))
)
)
```

```
(define complex
(lambda (type first-var second-var)
(if (equal? 'type Polar)
(cons (complex-polar first-var second-var)
(complex-rect (sqrt (+ (expt first-var 2)
(expt second-var 2)
)
)
0
)
) ;; Change second half to be the calculated values.
(cons (complex-polar 0 0) (complex-rect first-var second-var))
)
)
)
```

#### Building our PredicatesEdit

We have our constructors, now we need our predicates:

```
(define is-complex?
(lambda (var)
(and (typed? (car var))
(or (= 'Rect-Complex (type-of (car var)))
(= 'Polar-Complex (type-of (car var)))
)
)
)
)
```

Now we can define our arithmetic in terms of these procedures.