verview: Convergence criteria – Serlo „Math for Non-Geeks“


We already introduced a series as the sequence of the partial sums . A sequence is convergent, if the sequence of partial sums is convergent . Else the series is divergent. Assuming the series is convergent we define the value of the infinite sum of the series to be equal to the limit of the sequence.

Decision tree for convergence and divergence of series

In this chapter we will study different criteria or tests to determine whether a series is convergent or not. In further chapters, we will study each of this criteria more attentively and give a proof for each.

Criteria for convergence

edit

We will give a proof for the following propositions in the respective main article for the criterion. Let a series   be given. There is an arsenal of criteria to examine convergence:

Absolute convergence

edit


Definition (Absolute convergence)

A series   is called absolutely convergent, if   is convergent.

Theorem (Absolute convergence)

If a series is absolutely convergent, it is also convergent. So if   is convergent, then   is also convergent.

Example (Absolute convergence)

The series   is convergent, because it is absolutely convergent. The series of absolute values   is convergent.

Cauchy criterion

edit


Theorem (Cauchy criterion)

For all   let there be  , so that   for all  . Then the series is convergent.

Example (Cauchy criterion)

The geometric series   is convergent according to the Cauchy criterion, because:

 

Let  . Since   there is   with   for all  . For this   it follows from the above that   for all  . So we see that the series is convergent according to the Cauchy criterion.

Leibniz criterion

edit


Theorem (Leibniz criterion)

If the series has the form   and if the sequence   non-negative monotonic decreasing sequence null sequence , then the series is convergent.

Example (Leibniz criterion)

The convergence of the series   follows from the Leibniz criterion, because the sequence   is a non-negative monotonic decreasing null sequence.

Majorant criterion

edit


Theorem (Majorant criterion)

Let   for all  . If   is convergent, then the series   is absolutely convergent.

Example (Majorant criterion)

We have  . Since the series   is convergent (with limit 1), the series   is also (absolutely) convergent.

Ratio test

edit


Theorem (Ratio test)

Let   be a series with   for all  . If there exists a   and a  , so that   for all  , then the series   is absolutely convergent. This is particularly the case, if   or  .

Example (Ratio test)

The series   is convergent, since we find that:  

Root test

edit


Theorem (Root test)

If  , then the series   is absolutely convergent. In particular this is also true if  .

Example (Root test)

The series   is absolutely convergent, because we have:  

Cauchy condensation test

edit


Theorem (Cauchy condensation test)

Let   be a monotonically decreasing, real valued null sequence with   for all  . If   is convergent, so is  ).

Example (Cauchy condensation test)

The series   is convergent according to Cauchy condensation test, because the series   is convergent. Recall that   is convergent if   (here we have  ).

Integral test

edit

Theorem (Integral test)

Let  , i.e.   for a function  . If   is a monotonically decreasing function with non-negative values on the domain   and if  , then the series is absolutely convergent.

Example (Integral test)

The series   is absolutely convergent. We define   with  . This function is a non-negative monotonically decreasing function, and now we can use the Integral test:  

Hint

We will give a proof that the Integral test works, after we have introduced Integrals. But for completeness purposes we listed it here. Please note that you can use this test only if it was proved in your lecture!

Criteria for divergence

edit

We are given a series  . To show that this series is divergent, there are multiple criteria:

Term test

edit


Theorem (Term test)

If   diverges or  , the the series is divergent.

Example (Term test)

The series   is divergent, because we have:

 

Thus   cannot be a null sequence, which proves that   diverges.

Cauchy Test

edit


Theorem (Cauchy-Kriterium)

If there is an  , so that for all   there exist natural numbers   with  , then the series is divergent.

Example (Cauchy Test)

The series   is divergent according to the Cauchy test. Set  . For every   we choose   and  . We then have:

 

Minorant criterion

edit


Theorem (Minorant criterion)

Let   for almost all  . If   diverges, then also the series   diverges.

Example (Minorant criterion)

The series   is divergent, since we have   for all  , and the harmonic series   is divergent. In equations:

 

Quotient test

edit


Theorem (Quotient test for divergence)

If   for almost all   (i.e. for all   for fixed  ), then the series   diverges. In particular this is the case when .

Example (Quotient test for divergence)

The series   is divergent. Since we have:

 

Square root test

edit


Theorem (Square root test)

If  , the the series   is absolutely divergent. In particular, this is the case when  .

Example (Square root test)

The series   diverges, because we have:

 

Cauchy condensation test

edit


Theorem (Cauchy condensation test)

Let   be a monotonically decreasing real-valued null sequence with   for all  . If   diverges, then also   diverges.

Example (Cauchy condensation test)

The series   diverges, because   is a monotonically decreasing null sequence and the series   diverges.

Integral test

edit

Theorem (Integral test)

Let  , so   for a function  . If   on   is a monotonically decreasing non-negative function, and if  , then the series is divergent.

Example (Integral test)

The series   is divergent, because   with   is a monotonically decreasing non-negative function, and we have:

 

Convergence is independent from starting index

edit

In the section about the Cauchy test we saw that the starting index is irrelevant for the study of convergence. If we have a series of the form  , then we could also consider the series   or  . The only differences is the starting index  . This series all have the same convergence behaviour. So remember:


If we remove or alter finitely many summands, the individual values of the series will change of course, but the convergence behaviour stays the same. This fact is useful, you should always keep it in the back of your head. This could be useful in those cases, where you are not interested in the exact values of the series, but only if it converges or not.

Example

Let   be defined as follows:

 

Almost all members of the sequence   are identical to   (only finitely many exceptions). Since the series   is convergent, the series   is also convergent, but the exact value of the limit is not the same.