# Introduction to Mathematical Physics/Some mathematical problems and their solution/Boundary problems, variational methods

## Variational formulationEdit

secvafor

Let us consider a boundary problem:

**Problem:**

Find such that:

eqLufva

Let us suppose that is a unique solution of this problem. For a functional space sufficiently large the previous problem, may be equivalent to the following:

**Problem:**

Let us coonsider aboundey problem\

Find such that:

eqvari

This is the variational form of the boundary problem. To obtain the equality eqvari, we have just multiplied scalarly by a "test function" equation eqLufva. A "weak form" of this problem can be found using Green formula type formulas: the solution space is taken larger and as a counterpart, the test functions space is taken smaller. let us illustrate those ideas on a simple example:

**Example:**

Find in such that:

The variational formulation is: Find in such that:

Using the Green equality (see appendix secappendgreeneq)\index{Green formula} and the boundary conditions we can reformulate the problem in: find , such that:

One can show that this problem as a unique solution in where

is the Sobolev space of order 1 on and is the adherence of in the space (space of infinitely differentiable functions on , with compact support in ).

It may be that, as for the previous example, the solution function space and the test function space are the same. This is the case for most of linear operators encountered in physics. In this case, one can associate to a bilinear form . The (weak) variational problem is thus:

provari2

**Problem:**

Find such that

**Example:**

In this previous example, the bilinear form is:

There exist theorems (Lax-Milgram theorem for instance) that proove the existence and unicity of the solution of the previous problem provari2 , under certain conditions on the bilinear form .

## Finite elements approximationEdit

secvarinum

Let us consider the problem provari2 :

**Problem:**

Find such that:

The method of approximation consists in choosing a finite dimension subspace of and the problem to solve becomes:

provari3

**Problem:**
Find such that

A base of of is chosen to satisfy boundary conditions. The problem is reduced to finding the components of :

If is a bilinear form

and to find the 's is equivalent to solve a linear system (often close to a diagonal system)that can be solved by classical algorithms ([ma:equad:Ciarlet88],[ma:compu:Press92]) which can be direct methods (Gauss,Cholesky) or iterative (Jacobi, Gauss-Seidel, relaxation). Note that if the vectors of the basis of are eigenvectors of , then the solving of the system is immediate (diagonal system). This is the basis of the spectral methods for solving evolution problems. If is not linear, we have to solve a nonlinear system. Let us give an example of a basis .

**Example:**

When , an example of that can be chosen ([ma:equad:Ciarlet88]) is the set of piecewise-linear continuous functions that are zero in and (for Dirichlet boundary conditions). More precisely, can be approximated by the space of piecewise linear continuous functions on intervals , going from zero to , that are zero in and . The basis of such a space is made by functions defined by:

and zero anywhere else (see figure figapproxesp).

figapproxesp

## Finite difference approximationEdit

Finite difference method is one of the most basic method to tackle PDE problems. It is not strictly speaking a variational approximation. It is rather a sort of variational method where weight functions are Dirac functions . Indeed, when considering the boundary problem,

eqfini

instead of looking for an approximate solution which can be decomposed on a basis of weight functions :

the action of on is directly expressed in terms of Dirac functions, as well as the right hand term of equation eqfini:

eqfini2

\begin{rem} If contains derivatives, the following formulas are used : right formula, order 1:

right formula order 2:

Left formulas can be written in a similar way. Centred formulas, second order are:

Centred formulas, fourth order are:

\end{rem} One can show that the equation eqfini2 is equivalent to the system of equations:

eqfini3

One can see immediately that equation eqfini2 implies equation eqfini3 in choosing "test" functions of support and such that .

## Minimization problemsEdit

A minimization problem can be written as follows:

promini

**Problem:**
Let a functional space, a a functional.
Find , such that:

The solving of minimization problems depends first on the nature of the functional and on the space . As usually, the functional is often approximated by a function of several variables where the 's are the coordinate of in some base that approximates . The methods to solve minimization problems can be classified into two categories: One can distinguish problems without constraints (see Fig. figcontraintesans) and problems with constraints (see Fig. figcontrainteavec). Minimization problems without constraints can be tackled theoretically by the study of the zeros of the differential function if exists. Numerically it can be less expensive to use dedicated methods. There are methods that don't use derivatives of (downhill simplex method, direction-set method) and methods that use derivative of (conjugate gradient method, quasi-Newton methods). Details are given in ([ma:compu:Press92]). Problems with constraints reduce the functional space to a set of functions that satisfy some additional conditions. Note that those sets are not vectorial spaces: a linear combination of vectors of are not always in . Let us give some example of constraints: Let a functional space. Consider the space

where are functionals. This is a first example of constraints. It can be solved theoretically by using Lagrange multipliers ([ma:equad:Ciarlet88]), \index{constraint}. A second example of constraints is given by

where are functionals. The linear programming (see example exmplinepro) problem is an example of minimization problem with such constraints (in fact a mixing of equalities and inequalities constraints).

figcontraintesans

figcontrainteavec]]

figcontrainteaveclag

**Example:**

Let us consider of a first class of functional that are important for PDE problems. Consider again the bilinear form introduced at section secvafor. If this bilinear form is symmetrical, {\it i.e.}

the problem can be written as a minimization problem by introducing the functional:

One can show that (under certain conditions) solving the variational problem:\\ Find such that:

is equivalent to solve the minimization problem:\\ Find , such that:

Physical principles have sometimes a natural variational formulation (as natural as a PDE formulation). We will come back to the variational formulations at the section on least action principle (see section secprinmoindreact ) and at the section secpuisvirtu on the principle of virtual powers.

exmplinepro

**Example:**
Another example of functional is given by the linear programming problem. Let
us consider a function that can be located by its coordinates
in a basis
, :

In linear programming, the functional to minimize can be written

and is subject to primary constraints:

and additional constraints:

The numerical algorithm to solve this type of problem is presented in ([ma:compu:Press92]). It is called the simplex method.

exmpsimul

**Example:**
When the variables can take only discrete values, one speaks about
discrete or combinatorial optimization. The function to minimize can be for
instance (travelling salesman problem):

where are the coordinates of a city number . The coordinates of the cities are numbers fixed in advance but the order in which the cities are visited ({\it i.e} the permutation of ) is to be find to minimize . Simulated annealing is a method to solve this problem and is presented in ([ma:compu:Press92]).

## Lagrange multipliersEdit

Lagrange multipliers method is an interesting approach to solve the minimization problem of a function of variables with constraints, {\it i. e. } to solve the following problem: \index{contrainte}\index{Lagrange multiplier}

**Problem:**

Find in a space of dimension such that

with constraints,

Lagrange multipliers method is used in statistical physics (see sectionchapphysstat). In a problem without any constraints, solution verifies:

In the case with constraints, the coordinates of are not independent. Indeed, they should verify the relations:

Lagrange multipliers method consists in looking for numbers called Lagrange multipliers such that:

One obtains the following equation system: