Geometry for Elementary School/A proof of irrationality

Geometry for Elementary School
Pythagorean theorem A proof of irrationality Fractals

In mathematics, a rational number is a real number that can be written as the ratio of two integers, i.e., it is of the form

a/b where a and b are integers and b is not zero. An irrational number is a number that cannot be written as a ratio of two integers, i.e., it is not of the form
a/b .


History of the theory of irrational numbers edit

The discovery of irrational numbers is usually attributed to Pythagoras, more specifically to the Pythagorean Hippasus of Metapontum, who produced a proof of the irrationality of the  . The story goes that Hippasus discovered irrational numbers when trying to represent the square root of 2 as a fraction (proof below). However, Pythagoras believed in the absoluteness of numbers, and could not accept the existence of irrational numbers. He could not disprove their existence through logic, but his beliefs would not accept the existence of irrational numbers and so he sentenced Hippasus to death by drowning. As you see, mathematics might be dangerous.

Irrationality of the square root of 2 edit

In this section we attempt to explain why   is irrational. Irrational is a fancy word for a number that cannot be written as a fraction where the top and bottom of the fraction are whole numbers. At one point in time it was once believed that every number could be written as a fraction.

Before we start the proof we first should recall a few familiar facts. First, is that when we write fractions we can always reduce them so they have no common factors. Just to remind ourselves how this goes, let's think about the fraction  . Since 3 divides into 15 evenly, and 3 divides into 21 evenly, then we can make this fraction have a smaller numerator and denominator. In this example see this by the following calculation:

 .

The exact same calculation will let us get rid of any number that divides both the numerator and denominator. Imagine we have a fraction   and there is a number r so that r divides evenly into p, and r divides evenly into q. We can then write   (just like we wrote  ). We can also write  . Then the calculation looks like:

 .

So whenever we have a fraction where the numerator and denominator are numbers we don't know yet (so we need to use letters like p and q), we can assume we have already gotten rid of all the numbers that divide both p and q.

The other thing that we need to remember is our facts about even and odd numbers. First every even number is really 2 times some smaller number. This is easy to see if you list out the even numbers:

even number 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
the same even number
as 2·"something"
2·1 2·2 2·3 2·4 2·5 2·6 2·7 2·8 2·9 2·10

Finally we need to remember that the product of two even numbers is again an even number, and the product of two odd numbers is again an odd number. In fact this is just the familiar rules:

  • "even times even is even"
  • "odd times odd is odd"
  • "even times odd is even"


Now we can start thinking about the proof. The proof is a "proof by contradiction". For us this means we will start by assuming   can be written as a fraction. We will try to investigate and see what this means for the fraction, being careful that every step follows from the last step by something we know to be true. At the last step we will contradict ourselves. This will mean that we had to make a mistake somewhere. Since we were careful about all of the steps, the only possible place for a mistake will be that we assumed   can be written as a fraction.

  1. Assume that   can be written as a fraction. This means  . We will assume that this fraction is reduced, so no number could divide both a and b. Specifically 2 cannot divide both a and b.
  2. We now square both sides of your equation, that is we write  , which is the same as  .
  3. By multiplying both sides by  , it follows that  .
  4. Therefore   is even, because it is equal to   which is even.
  5. If   were odd, then   would be odd, because "an odd times an odd is odd". So, it follows that   must be even.
  6. Because   is even, and every even number is 2 times something, we can write  , for some whole number  .
  7. If we substitute   in for   in the equation in line 3, we get  . Now  . So,  .
  8. Because   is even then   is also even. Just like we saw with   in line 5, this means that b is even.
  9. In line 5 we saw that   was even and so 2 divides  . In line 8 we saw that   was even, so 2 divides  . But in line 1 we said that 2 cannot divide both   and  . This is a contradiction.

Since we have found a contradiction, the assumption in line 1 must be false. That is, it must be false that   where   and   are whole numbers. So we cannot write   has a fraction. The fancy way of saying this is to say that   is irrational.