Open main menu

IntroductionEdit

 
HMS Triumph (S93) anechoic tiling.

One important application of acoustics research is the testing, design, and construction of anechoic tiles for underwater acoustic stealth. Anechoic tiling, first used in the Second World War by German U-boats (codenamed “Alberich” [1]), are used to reduce the acoustic signature of naval vessels. The tiles reduce both reflected active SONAR off the pressure hull, and reduce internal noise transmitted through the pressure hull that can be picked up by passive SONAR. In modern times, anechoic tiles are present on nearly all submarines. The frequency range of SONAR, and consequently the range of interest of anechoic tiling to minimize detection, is around 1-30 kHz [2].

The main sound attenuation mechanism in the tiles comes from resonant scattering the sound waves due to air cavities in the rubber. The use of air bubbles to attenuate sound was first published by German acousticians Erwin Meyer and Eugen Skudrzyk in a report written in the British occupied zone of Germany in 1946, translated to English in 1950 for an unclassified release by the U.S. Navy [3]. The air bubbles work to attenuate sound by acting as resonant oscillators and dissipate acoustic energy through thermal losses, frictional losses, and other processes[3].

Tank measurements of acoustic parameters with the panel surround on both sides by water, or “free-field”, are theoretically simple measurements that can be conducted in an interior laboratory setting [4], and will be described in later sections. Audoly [5] presents a method to transfer the results of free-field acoustic properties from tank acoustic measurements to the acoustic properties of panels with arbitrary backing, such as the rigid backing of a submarine hull.

Planar WavesEdit

The transmission and reflection coefficients   and   are presented as ratios of the incident, reflected, and transmitted acoustic pressure magnitudes:

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The conservation of acoustic power from transmitted waves through a panel is as follows:  

Where   is the acoustic absorption coefficient. From careful observation of the conservation of energy equation, it is evident that to minimize   and  , acoustic energy dissipated   should be increased. In materials such as metals in the frequency ranges pertinent to this study,  . In rubber materials, and especially those with air voids [1] [3],   can no longer be assumed to be negligible [6].

The terms "insertion loss" ( ) or "echo reduction" ( ) are used. The insertion loss is the reduction (in decibels) of the acoustic power of the insertion of a panel, related to the transmission coefficient:  , and the echo reduction is the reduction (in decibels) of the acoustic power after a reflection:  .

Three-layered media: No panel absorptionEdit

For three-layered medium with two infinite fluid layers, each with impedance   on either side of a sample of thickness   and impedance impedance  , and  , at normal incidence the following equation for the reflection coefficient   may be used [7]:

 

 

 

 

 

(2)

For the symmetrical case of the first fluid and third fluid identical  , equation (2) can be reduced into the following simplified formulations [8]:

 

 

 

 

 

(3)

Where  . By inspection of equations (3), resonances of minima of   and maxima of   occur at  . These lossless   and   are plotted over   in the following figures in the next section (for aluminum panels suspended in water) as the black lines.

Three-layered media: With panel absorptionEdit

For panel media with acoustic attenuation, the following formulas in (4) can be used to describe the insertion loss and echo reduction, where   is the attenuation constant in  , and  [6]. For the case of no acoustic attenuation  , equations (3) are recovered.

 

 

 

 

 

(4)

A sketch of the effect of absorption in panel materials on   and   is shown in the following figures:

Images


For a general formulation of n-layer solid panels with absorption, methods are described in references [9] [10].

Determination of α(ω) from experimental dataEdit

A 2nd order approximation for   is used (Equation (5)) as it is not constant over frequency [6], as shown for the case of aluminum and nitrile rubber in the figure below.

 

 

 

 

 

(5)

Images


It is possible to experimentally determine   from tank acoustic tests. First the magnitude of the absorption coefficient is determined from conservation of energy and measured values of   and   [6]:

 

 

 

 

 

(6)

The coefficient   in equation (5) is estimated using the following formula, then   is then fit to data [6].

 

 

 

 

 

(7)

Experimental InvestigationsEdit

To characterize   and  of panel materials, free field acoustic measurements are performed: In a water-filled tank, a parametric array source   produces an highly directional discrete acoustic wave [4] with the far-field directionality function   [13]. For demonstration, the far field directionality of an underwater array source is included in the insertion loss sample measurement figure below. The shape of the discrete wave is shown in [4].

 

 

 

 

 

(8)

Insertion LossEdit

Using a hydrophone  , one recording is made with the sample   in place to record transmitted pressure   and one measurement without the sample in place to record incident pressure  . The measurement configurations are shown in the following figures.

Images


Echo ReductionEdit

For reflection experiments, the reflected pressure   off the sample is measured, and for the incident pressure   measurement a foam reflector is used. A foam reflector has a high acoustic impedance mismatch with the water and reflects sound efficiently.

Images


Pressure MeasurementsEdit

Shown in the following figures, the measured pressure signals over time are are recorded and processed with a Fourier transform to determine pressure over frequency. The coefficients   and   over frequency are simply the ratio of the resultant pressure spectra.

Images


ResultsEdit

Insertion loss and echo reduction plots for, aluminum test samples, such as those measured in [4], are shown in the following figures. Aluminum samples are conducted as it is a material with well known acoustic properties, and negligibly low absorption over the frequencies studied. The experimental setup described shows good agreement with theory [4] [14].

Images


Other ConsiderationsEdit

For applications of anechoic tiling on submarines, the conditions surrounding the submarine change drastically with submerged depth. Varying pressure, salinity, temperature all affect acoustic properties of the rubber, the surrounding water, and the anechoic tile in general. Environmental tank such as the ones described in reference [14] can be used to simulate ocean conditions. The wavelength of the sound produced by the parametric array is limited by the physical size of the tank. Achieving lower frequency measurements necessitates the use of larger tanks for experiments, or semi-anechoic siding on the tank walls [14].

ReferencesEdit

  1. a b James L Lastinger and Gerald A Sabin. Underwater sound absorbers: A review of published research with an annotated bibliography . Technical report, NAVAL RESEARCH LAB ORLANDO FL UNDERWATER SOUND REFERENCE DIV, 1970.
  2. N. Friedman and United States Naval Institute. The Naval Institute guide to world naval weapons systems. The Naval Institute Guide To... Series. Naval Institute Press, 1989.
  3. a b c Walter Kuhl. Sound absorption and sound absorbers in water (Dynamic properties of rubber and rubberlike substances in the acoustic frequency region). Dept. of the Navy, Bureau of Ships, 1950.
  4. a b c d e V.F. Humphrey. The measurement of acoustic properties of limited size panels by use of a parametric source. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 98(1):67 – 81, 1985.
  5. Christian Audoly. Determination of efficiency of anechoic or decoupling hull coatings using water tank acoustic measurements. In Societe Francaise d’Acoustique, editor, Acoustics 2012, Nantes, France, April 2012.
  6. a b c d e E. Eugene Mikeska and John A. Behrens. Evaluation of transducer window materials. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59(6):1294–1298, 1976.
  7. Lawrence E Kinsler, Austin R Frey, Alan B Coppens, and James V Sanders. Fundamentals of Acoustics. 4th Edition, pp. 560. ISBN 0-471-84789-5. Wiley-VCH, December 1999., page 560, 1999.
  8. Robert J Bobber. Underwater electroacoustic measurements. Technical report, NAVAL RESEARCH LAB ORLANDO FL UNDERWATER SOUND REFERENCE DIV, 1970.
  9. A. K. Mal, C.-C. Yin, and Y. Bar-Cohen. The Influence of Material Dissipation and Imperfect Bonding on Acoustic Wave Reflection from Layered Solids, pages 927–934. Springer US, Boston, MA, 1988.
  10. Bernard Hosten and Michel Castaings. Transfer matrix of multilayered absorbing and anisotropic media. Measurements and simulations of ultrasonic wave propagation through composite materials. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(3):1488–1495, 1993.
  11. Mary A Paul. Transducer effects on ultrasonic attenuation measurements. 1989.
  12. Kyung-Il Jung, Suk Wang Yoon, Kuk Young Cho, and Jung-Ki Park. Acoustic properties of nitrile butadiene rubber for underwater applications. Journal of applied polymer science, 85(13):2764–2771, 2002.
  13. P. D. Thorne. A broad-band acoustic source for underwater laboratory applications. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 34(5):515–523, Sept 1987.
  14. a b c Victor F Humphrey, Stephen P Robinson, John D Smith, Michael J Martin, Graham A Beamiss, Gary Hayman, and Nicholas L Carroll. Acoustic characterization of panel materials under simulated ocean conditions using a parametric array source. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(2):803–814, 2008.

Back to main page


By: Geoffrey Chase