Commutative Algebra/Radicals, strong Nakayama
Radicals of ideals
editDefinition 13.1:
Let be a ring, an ideal. The radical of , denoted , is
- .
A radical ideal is an ideal such that .
Theorem 13.2:
Let be a ring, an ideal. Then
- .
Proof:
For , note that . For , assume for no . Form the quotient ring . By theorem 12.3, pick a prime ideal disjoint from the multiplicatively closed set . Form the ideal . is a prime ideal which contains and does not intersect . Hence is not in the right hand side.
Corollary 13.3:
The radical of an ideal is an ideal.
Proof:
Intersection of ideals is an ideal.
Definition 13.4:
Let be a ring, . The Jacobson radical of is defined as thus:
- .
Theorem 13.5:
Let be a ring, . is a radical ideal.
Proof:
Clearly, . Further from theorem 13.2; the last equality from .
The radicals of the zero ideal
editDefinition 13.6:
Let be a ring. is an ideal. The nilradical of , written , is defined as
- .
Note that by definition
- ,
the set of nilpotent elements.
Theorem 13.7:
- .
Proof:
Theorem 13.2.
Definition 13.8:
Let be a ring. is an ideal. The Jacobson radical of , written , is defined as
- .
We have .
If is a ring, is the set of units of .
Theorem 13.9:
Let be a ring, its Jacobson radical. Then
- .
Proof:
: Let , . Assume . Form the ideal ; by theorem 12.8 there exists maximal with , hence . If , then , contradiction.
: Assume for all and . Then there is a maximal ideal not containing . Hence and for a and an . Hence is not a unit.
Radicals and localisation
editDefinition 13.10:
If is a ring, is a multiplicative subset, an ideal, set
- ,
the localisation of the ideal with respect to .
Theorem 13.11:
Let be a ring, an ideal, a multiplicatively closed subset. Then
- .
Proof:
Let , that is, . Then , , . There exists such that . Thus , whence and . Thus, .
Let . We may assume . Choose such that . Then , whence .
Strong Nakayama lemma
editExercises
edit- Prove that whenever is a reduced ring, then the canonical homomorphism is injective.