Commutative Algebra/Kernels, cokernels, products, coproducts

Kernels

edit

Definition 3.1:

Let   be a category with zero objects, and let   be a morphism between two objects   of  . A kernel of   is an arrow  , where   is what we shall call the object associated to the kernel  , such that

  1.  , and
  2. for each object   of   and each morphism   such that  , there exists a unique   such that  .

The second property is depicted in the following commutative diagram:

 

Note that here, we don't see kernels only as subsets, but rather as an object together with a morphism. This is because in the category of groups, for example, we can take the morphism just by inclusion. Let me explain.

Example 3.2:

In the category of groups, every morphism has a kernel.

Proof:

Let   be groups and   a morphism (that is, a group homomorphism). We set

 

and

 ,

the inclusion. This is indeed a kernel in the category of groups. For, if   is a group homomorphism such that  , then   maps wholly to  , and we may simply write  . This is also clearly a unique factorisation. 

For kernels the following theorem holds:

Theorem 3.3:

Let   be a category with zero objects, let   be a morphism and let   be a kernel of  . Then   is a monic (that is, a monomorphism).

Proof:

Let  . The situation is depicted in the following picture:

 

Here, the three lower arrows depict the general property of the kernel. Now the morphisms   and   are both factorisations of the morphism   over  . By uniqueness in factorisations,  . 

Kernels are essentially unique:

Theorem 3.4:

Let   be a category with zero objects, let   be a morphism and let  ,   be two kernels of  . Then

 ;

that is to say,   and   are isomorphic.

Proof:

From the first property of kernels, we obtain   and  . Hence, the second property of kernels imply the commutative diagrams

  and  .

We claim that   and   are inverse to each other.

  and  .

Since both   and   are monic by theorem 3.3, we may cancel them to obtain

  and  ,

that is, we have inverse arrows and thus, by definition, isomorphisms. 

Cokernels

edit

An analogous notion is that of a cokernel. This notion is actually common in mathematics, but not so much at the undergraduate level.

Definition 3.5:

Let   be a category with zero objects, and let   be a morphism between two objects   of  . A cokernel of   is an arrow  , where   is an object of   which we may call the object associated to the cokernel  , such that

  1.  , and
  2. for each object   of   and each morphism   such that  , there exists a unique factorisation   for a suitable morphism  .

The second property is depicted in the following picture:

 

Again, this notion is just a generalisation of facts observed in "everyday" categories. Our first example of cokernels shall be the existence of cokernels in Abelian groups. Now actually, cokernels exist even in the category of groups, but the construction is a bit tricky since in general, the image need not be a normal subgroup, which is why we may not be able to form the factor group by the image. In Abelian groups though, all subgroups are normal, and hence this is possible.

Example 3.6:

In the category of Abelian groups, every morphism has a cokernel.

Proof:

Let   be any two Abelian groups, and let   be a group homomorphism. We set

 ;

we may form this quotient group because within an Abelian group, all subgroups are normal. Further, we set

 ,

the projection (we adhere to the custom of writing Abelian groups in an additive fashion). Let now   be a group homomorphism such that  , where   is another Abelian group. Then the function

 

is well-defined (because of the rules for group morphisms) and the desired unique factorisation of   is given by  . 

Theorem 3.7:

Every cokernel is an epi.

Proof:

Let   be a morphism and   a corresponding cokernel. Assume that  . The situation is depicted in the following picture:

 

Now again,  , and   and   are by their equality both factorisations of  . Hence, by the uniqueness of such factorisations required in the definition of cokernels,  . 

Theorem 3.8:

If a morphism   has two cokernels   and   (let's call the associated objects   and  ), then  ; that is,   and   are isomorphic.

Proof:

Once again, we have   and  , and hence we obtain commutative diagrams

  and  .

We once again claim that   and   are inverse to each other. Indeed, we obtain the equations

  and  

and by cancellation (both   and   are epis due to theorem 8.7) we obtain

  and  

and hence the theorem. 

Interplay between kernels and cokernels

edit

Theorem 3.9:

Let   be a category with zero objects, and let   be a morphism of   such that   is the kernel of some arbitrary morphism   of  . Then   is also the kernel of any cokernel of itself.

Proof:

  means

 .

We set  , that is,

 .

In particular, since  , there exists a unique   such that  . We now want that   is a kernel of  , that is,

 .

Hence assume  . Then  . Hence, by the topmost diagram (in this proof),   for a unique  , which is exactly what we want. Further,   follows from the second diagram of this proof.  

Theorem 3.10:

Let   be a category with zero objects, and let   be a morphism of   such that   is the kernel of some arbitrary morphism   of  . Then   is also the cokernel of any kernel of itself.

Proof:

The statement that   is the cokernel of   reads

 .

We set  , that is

 .

In particular, since  ,   for a suitable unique morphism  . We now want   to be a cokernel of  , that is,

 .

Let thus  . Then also   and hence   has a unique factorisation   by the topmost diagram. 

Corollary 3.11:

Let   be a category that has a zero object and where all morphisms have kernels and cokernels, and let   be an arbitrary morphism of  . Then

 

and

 .

The equation

 

is to be read "the kernel of   is a kernel of any cokernel of itself", and the same for the other equation with kernels replaced by cokernels and vice versa.

Proof:

  is a morphism which is some kernel. Hence, by theorem 3.9

 

(where the equation is to be read "  is a kernel of any cokernel of  "). Similarly, from theorem 3.10

 ,

where  . 

Products

edit

Definition 3.12:

Let   be a category, and let   be two objects of  . A product of   and  , denoted  , is an object of   together with two morphisms

  and  ,

called the projections of  , such that for any morphisms   and   there exists a unique morphism such that the following diagram commutes:

[[]]

Example 3.13:


Theorem 3.14:

If   is a category,   are objects of   and   are products of   and  , then

 ,

that is,   and   are isomorphic.

Theorem 3.15:

Let   be a category,   objects of   and   a product of   and  . Then the projection morphisms and are monics.

Coproducts

edit

Definition 3.16:

Let   be a category, and let   and   be objects of  . Then a coproduct of   and   is another object of  , denoted  , together with two morphisms and such that for any morphisms and , there exist morphisms such that and .

Example 3.17:

Theorem 3.18:

Theorem 3.19:

Biproducts

edit

Definition 3.20:

Let   be a category that contains two objects   and  . Assume we are given an object   of   together with four morphisms that make it into a product, and simultaneously into a coproduct. Then we call   a biproduct of the two objects   and   and denote it by

 .

Example 3.21:

Within the category of Abelian groups, a biproduct is given by the product group; if   are Abelian groups, set the product group of   and   to be

 ,

the cartesian product, with component-wise group operation.

Proof: