Canadian Criminal Law/Appendix/Model Examinations/Impaired Driving and Over 80
Impaired
editOfficers evidence
editBackground
- identify Cst. by name, current rank, jurisdiction, current assignment, duration of employment as a peace officer
- confirm whether working and on duty on offence date and at offence time / confirm specific assignment at the time
- officer's training or experience in dealing with impaired drivers
Cause for Contact with Accused
- confirm that officer made contact with an individual by the name of the accused / confirm if person is in court today
- how officer first come in contact with accused / reason for stopping accused (pull over, MV collision, response to 911 call)
- what the officer knew about the accused before making contact
- time when first made contact / others present with officer at the time / others present with accused at the time
- Whether the accused was seen driving / time of observation / Make and model of vehicle / Licence plate number
- Any observations of the manner in which the Accused drove
Contact with accused
- Discuss what happened at initial contact / details on interaction
- confirm whether officer informed the accused of reason for stopping them
- determine how officer was able confirm the identity of the accused
- the demeanor / mood and physical condition of the accused
Reasonable suspicion for Road-side Demand
- whether there was a decision to make demand / timing of decision
- confirm whether the officer formed a reasonable suspicion that
- the accused was driving and
- the accused had alcohol in system within last 3 hours
- review the grounds of suspicion
- at time of decision to demand what was demeanor / mood and physical condition of accused
- review signs observed (slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, smell of alcohol from breath/from vehicle, unsteady movements, mumbling, not able to walk straight, falling asleep, poor coordination, etc.)
- review observations of driving (crossing lines, not obey rules of road, headlights off at night)
Making the Demand for roadside test
- whether the demand was made / wording of demand / timing of demand
- review any reasons for delays between decision and demand
Administering Roadside test
- discuss officer administering the roadside test
- review procedure of the test / results / timing of each test
- review reasons for any delay between the demand and the test / was it most direct route
- confirm whether the device was an "approved" device
- conclusion of the results
Reasonable grounds of impairment
- opinion on whether the accused's ability to operate the vehicle was impaired:
- belief of accused driving within last 3 hours
- belief of driving ability affected by impairment
- belief of impairment due to alcohol
Making the Demand for Breathalyser test
- made demand / read from card / time of reading
- signs that the accused understood / accused's answer
- advised of right to lawyer (10(b) right) / read from card / time of reading
- was accused arrested / timing of arrest
Accessing counsel, if requested
- review the steps that the officer took to facilitate access to counsel
- access to phone was private
- timing and duration of the phone call
Breath Tech
editMaking the Demand for Breathalyser test
- made demand / read from card / time of reading
- signs that the accused understood / accused's answer
- advised of right to lawyer (10(b) right) / read from card / time of reading
- was accused arrested / timing of arrest
Accessing counsel, if requested
- review the steps that the officer took to facilitate access to counsel
- access to phone was private
- timing and duration of the phone call
Calibration of Machine
- device used / whether it is an approved screening device
- timing of last calibration
- method of calibrating test (purged with a blank test followed by an external test) / readings given
Timing Breathalyser test
- time taken between demand and arrival at machine / most direct route / stops in between / any other delays / time taken to set up the machine
- timing of beginning test
Breath Tests
- used new mouth piece
- demonstrated how to blow / accused appeared to understand
- time of first reading / second reading
- results of reach reading
- preparation of Certificate of Analysis [make certificate an exhibit]
- review contents of certificate
Refusal
editBreath Tech
edit- gave him a warning of requirement of breath demand / timing of demand / reason for any delay
- gave s.10(b) caution / timing of caution / reason for any delay
- response to demand and delay / did they understand / was counsel requested
- steps taken the facilitate access to counsel
- number of times of attempts / timing of first attempt / and time between each / reason for the delay between samples
- at time of test what was demeanor / mood; odour of alcohol
- was he able to provide a sample / refused using what words or behaviour
- explained to him the consequences of refusal
Attempts
- gave instructions: put mouth on, create seal, blow hard as long as possible
- he understood
- used new mouth piece
- put mouth on device properly / created seal / blow hard as possible
- hear sound of breath
- how much breath is needed
- reported any physical reason for failing / see any signs supporting this
functionality of the device
- inspect the mouth piece for obstructions prior to each test
- did you calibrate of datamaster for alcohol testing