# Calculus/Definite integral

Suppose we are given a function and would like to determine the area underneath its graph over an interval. We could guess, but how could we figure out the exact area? Below, using a few clever ideas, we actually *define* such an area and show that by using what is called the **definite integral** we can indeed determine the exact area underneath a curve.

## Definition of the Definite IntegralEdit

The rough idea of defining the area under the graph of is to approximate this area with a finite number of rectangles. Since we can easily work out the area of the rectangles, we get an estimate of the area under the graph. If we use a larger number of smaller-sized rectangles we expect greater accuracy with respect to the area under the curve and hence a better approximation. Somehow, it seems that we could use our old friend from differentiation, the limit, and "approach" an infinite number of rectangles to get the exact area. Let's look at such an idea more closely.

Suppose we have a function that is positive on the interval and we want to find the area under between and . Let's pick an integer and divide the interval into subintervals of equal width (see Figure 1). As the interval has width , each subinterval has width . We denote the endpoints of the subintervals by . This gives us

Now for each pick a *sample point* in the interval and consider the rectangle of height and width (see Figure 2). The area of this rectangle is . By adding up the area of all the rectangles for we get that the area is approximated by

A more convenient way to write this is with summation notation:

For each number we get a different approximation. As gets larger the width of the rectangles gets smaller which yields a better approximation (see Figure 3). In the limit of as tends to infinity we get the area .

**Definition of the Definite Integral**

Suppose is a continuous function on and . Then the *definite integral* of between and is

It is a fact that if is continuous on then this limit always exists and does not depend on the choice of the points . For instance they may be evenly spaced, or distributed ambiguously throughout the interval. The proof of this is technical and is beyond the scope of this section.

**Notation**

*integrand*and the interval is the interval of integration. Also is called the

*lower limit*and the

*upper limit*of integration.

One important feature of this definition is that we also allow functions which take negative values. If for all then so . So the definite integral of will be strictly negative. More generally if takes on both positive and negative values then will be the area under the positive part of the graph of **minus** the area above the graph of the negative part of the graph (see Figure 4). For this reason we say that is the **signed area** under the graph.

### Independence of VariableEdit

It is important to notice that the variable did not play an important role in the definition of the integral. In fact we can replace it with any other letter, so the following are all equal:

Each of these is the signed area under the graph of between and . Such a variable is often referred to as a **dummy variable** or a **bound variable**.

### Left and Right Handed Riemann SumsEdit

The following methods are sometimes referred to as L-RAM and R-RAM, RAM standing for "Rectangular Approximation Method."

We could have decided to choose all our sample points to be on the right hand side of the interval (see Figure 5). Then for all and the approximation that we called for the area becomes

This is called the *right-handed Riemann sum*, and the integral is the limit

Alternatively we could have taken each sample point on the left hand side of the interval. In this case (see Figure 6) and the approximation becomes

Then the integral of is

The key point is that, as long as is continuous, these two definitions give the same answer for the integral.

### ExamplesEdit

**Example 1**

In this example we will calculate the area under the curve given by the graph of for between 0 and 1. First we fix an integer and divide the interval into subintervals of equal width. So each subinterval has width

To calculate the integral we will use the right-handed Riemann sum. (We could have used the left-handed sum instead, and this would give the same answer in the end). For the right-handed sum the sample points are

Notice that . Putting this into the formula for the approximation,

Now we use the formula

to get

To calculate the integral of between and we take the limit as tends to infinity,

**Example 2**

Next we show how to find the integral of the function between and . This time the interval has width so

Once again we will use the right-handed Riemann sum. So the sample points we choose are

Thus

We have to calculate each piece on the right hand side of this equation. For the first two,

For the third sum we have to use a formula

to get

Putting this together

Taking the limit as tend to infinity gives

### ExercisesEdit

## Basic Properties of the IntegralEdit

From the definition of the integral we can deduce some basic properties. For all the following rules, suppose that and are continuous on .

### The Constant RuleEdit

**Constant Rule**

When is positive, the height of the function at a point is times the height of the function . So the area under between and is times the area under . We can also give a proof using the definition of the integral, using the constant rule for limits,

**Example**

We saw in the previous section that

Using the constant rule we can use this to calculate that

- ,
- .

**Example**

We saw in the previous section that

We can use this and the constant rule to calculate that

There is a special case of this rule used for integrating constants:

**Integrating Constants**

When and this integral is the area of a rectangle of height and width which equals .

**Example**

### The addition and subtraction ruleEdit

**Addition and Subtraction Rules of Integration**

As with the constant rule, the addition rule follows from the addition rule for limits:

The subtraction rule can be proved in a similar way.

**Example**

From above and so

**Example**

#### ExerciseEdit

### The Comparison RuleEdit

**Comparison Rule**

- Suppose for all . Then

- Suppose for all . Then

- Suppose for all . Then

If then each of the rectangles in the Riemann sum to calculate the integral of will be above the axis, so the area will be non-negative. If then and by the first property we get the second property. Finally if then the area under the graph of will be greater than the area of rectangle with height and less than the area of the rectangle with height (see Figure 7). So

### Linearity with respect to endpointsEdit

**Additivity with respect to endpoints**
Suppose . Then

Again suppose that is positive. Then this property should be interpreted as saying that the area under the graph of between and is the area between and plus the area between and (see Figure 8).

**Extension of Additivity with respect to limits of integration**

When we have that so

Also in defining the integral we assumed that . But the definition makes sense even when , in which case has changed sign. This gives

With these definitions,

#### ExerciseEdit

### Even and odd functionsEdit

Recall that a function is called odd if it satisfies and is called even if .

Suppose is a continuous odd function then for any ,

If is a continuous even function then for any ,

Suppose is an odd function and consider first just the integral from to . We make the substitution so . Notice that if then and if then . Hence

- .

Now as is odd, so the integral becomes

- .

Now we can replace the dummy variable with any other variable. So we can replace it with the letter to give

- .

Now we split the integral into two pieces

- .

The proof of the formula for even functions is similar.

- .