Analytic Number Theory/Dirichlet series

For the remainder of this book, we shall use Riemann's convention of denoting complex numbers:

Definition

edit

Definition 5.1:

Let   be an arithmetic function. Then the Dirichlet series associated to   is the series

 ,

where   ranges over the complex numbers.

Convergence considerations

edit

Theorem 5.2 (abscissa of absolute convergence):

Let   be an arithmetic function such that the series of absolute values associated to the Dirichlet series associated to  

 

neither diverges at all   nor converges for all  . Then there exists  , called the abscissa of absolute convergence, such that the Dirichlet series associated to   converges absolutely for all  ,   and it's associated series of absolute values diverges for all  ,  .

Proof:

Denote by   the set of all real numbers   such that

 

diverges. Due to the assumption, this set is neither empty nor equal to  . Further, if  , then for all   and all    , since

 

and due to the comparison test. It follows that   has a supremum. Let   be that supremum. By definition, for   we have convergence, and if we had convergence for   we would have found a lower upper bound due to the above argument, contradicting the definition of  . 

Theorem 5.3 (abscissa of conditional convergence):

Formulas

edit

Theorem 8.4 (Euler product):

Let   be a strongly multiplicative function, and let   such that the corresponding Dirichlet series converges absolutely. Then for that series we have the formula

 .

Proof:

This follows directly from theorem 2.11 and the fact that   strongly multiplicative     strongly multiplicative.