In topology, two continuous functions from one topological space to another are called homotopic (Greek ὁμός (homós) = same, similar, and τόπος (tópos) = place) if one can be "continuously deformed" into the other, such a deformation being called a homotopy between the two functions. A notable use of homotopy is the definition of homotopy groups and cohomotopy groups, important invariants in algebraic topology.
In practice, there are technical difficulties in using homotopies with certain spaces. Algebraic topologists work with compactly generated spaces, CW complexes, or spectra.
Contents
Formal definitionEdit
Formally, a homotopy between two continuous functions f and g from a topological space X to a topological space Y is defined to be a continuous function H : X × [0,1] → Y from the product of the space X with the unit interval [0,1] to Y such that, if x ∈ X then H(x,0) = f(x) and H(x,1) = g(x).
If we think of the second parameter of H as time then H describes a continuous deformation of f into g: at time 0 we have the function f and at time 1 we have the function g. We can also think of the second parameter as a "slider control" that allows us to smoothly transition from f to g as the slider moves from 0 to 1, and vice versa.
An alternative notation is to say that a homotopy between two continuous functions f, g : X → Y is a family of continuous functions h_{t} : X → Y for t ∈ [0,1] such that h_{0} = f and h_{1} = g, and the map (x,t) ↦ h_{t}(x) is continuous from X × [0,1] to Y. The two versions coincide by setting h_{t}(x) = H(x,t). It is not sufficient to require each map t ↦ h_{t}(x) to be continuous.^{[1]}
PropertiesEdit
Continuous functions f and g are said to be homotopic if and only if there is a homotopy H taking f to g as described above. Being homotopic is an equivalence relation on the set of all continuous functions from X to Y. This homotopy relation is compatible with function composition in the following sense: if f_{1}, g_{1} : X → Y are homotopic, and f_{2}, g_{2} : Y → Z are homotopic, then their compositions f_{2} ∘ f_{1} and g_{2} ∘ g_{1} : X → Z are also homotopic.
Homotopy equivalenceEdit
Given two spaces X and Y, we say they are homotopy equivalent, or of the same homotopy type, if there exist continuous maps f : X → Y and g : Y → X such that g ∘ f is homotopic to the identity map id_{X} and f ∘ g is homotopic to id_{Y}.
The maps f and g are called homotopy equivalences in this case. Every homeomorphism is a homotopy equivalence, but the converse is not true: for example, a solid disk is not homeomorphic to a single point (since there is no bijection between them), although the disk and the point are homotopy equivalent (since you can deform the disk along radial lines continuously to a single point). Spaces that are homotopy equivalent to a point are called contractible.
Intuitively, two spaces X and Y are homotopy equivalent if they can be transformed into one another (i.e., made homeomorphic) by bending, shrinking and expanding operations. For example, a solid disk or solid ball is homotopy equivalent to a point, and R^{2} − {(0,0)} is homotopy equivalent to the unit circle S^{1}. However, one has to be careful to not think of such transformations in terms of embeddings only — for example, the double torus and the double torus with the rings interlinked are homotopy equivalent (since they are homeomorphic), even though the said transformation cannot be embedded in threedimensional Euclidean space without the rings "passing through" each other.
NullhomotopyEdit
A function f is said to be nullhomotopic if it is homotopic to a constant function. (The homotopy from f to a constant function is then sometimes called a nullhomotopy.) For example, a map f from the unit circle S^{1} to any space X is nullhomotopic precisely when it can be extended to a map from the unit disk D^{2} to X that agrees with f on the boundary.
It follows from these definitions that a space X is contractible if and only if the identity map from X to itself—which is always a homotopy equivalence—is nullhomotopic.
Homotopy invarianceEdit
Homotopy equivalence is important because in algebraic topology many concepts are homotopy invariant, that is, they respect the relation of homotopy equivalence. For example, if X and Y are homotopy equivalent spaces, then:
 If X is pathconnected then so is Y.
 If X is simply connected then so is Y.
 The (singular) homology and cohomology groups of X and Y are isomorphic.
 If X and Y are pathconnected, then the fundamental groups of X and Y are isomorphic, and so are the higher homotopy groups. (Without the pathconnectedness assumption, one has π_{1}(X,x_{0}) isomorphic to π_{1}(Y,f(x_{0})) where f : X → Y is a homotopy equivalence and x_{0} ∈ X.)
An example of an algebraic invariant of topological spaces which is not homotopyinvariant is compactly supported homology (which is, roughly speaking, the homology of the compactification, and compactification is not homotopyinvariant).
Relative homotopyEdit
In order to define the fundamental group, one needs the notion of homotopy relative to a subspace. These are homotopies which keep the elements of the subspace fixed. Formally: if f and g are continuous maps from X to Y and K is a subset of X, then we say that f and g are homotopic relative to K if there exists a homotopy H : X × [0,1] → Y between f and g such that H(k,t) = f(k) = g(k) for all k ∈ K and t ∈ [0,1]. Also, if g is a retract from X to K and f is the identity map, this is known as a strong deformation retract of X to K. When K is a point, the term pointed homotopy is used.
Homotopy groupsEdit
Since the relation of two functions f, g : X → Y being homotopic relative to a subspace is an equivalence relation, we can look at the equivalence classes of maps between a fixed X and Y. If we fix X = [0,1]^{n}, the unit interval [0,1] crossed with itself n times, and we take a subspace

A reader requests clarification of this page's material to reduce confusion. You can help clarify material, request assistance, or view current progress. 
to be its boundary ∂([0,1]^{n}) then the equivalence classes form a group, denoted π_{n}(Y,y_{0}), where y_{0} is in the image of the subspace ∂([0,1]^{n}).
We can define the action of one equivalence class on another, and so we get a group. These groups are called the homotopy groups. In the case n = 1, it is also called the fundamental group.
Homotopy categoryEdit
The idea of homotopy can be turned into a formal category of category theory. The homotopy category is the category whose objects are topological spaces, and whose morphisms are homotopy equivalence classes of continuous maps. Two topological spaces X and Y are isomorphic in this category if and only if they are homotopyequivalent. Then a functor on the category of topological spaces is homotopy invariant if it can be expressed as a functor on the homotopy category.
For example, homology groups are a functorial homotopy invariant: this means that if f and g from X to Y are homotopic, then the group homomorphisms induced by f and g on the level of homology groups are the same: H_{n}(f) = H_{n}(g) : H_{n}(X) → H_{n}(Y) for all n. Likewise, if X and Y are in addition path connected, and the homotopy between f and g is pointed, then the group homomorphisms induced by f and g on the level of homotopy groups are also the same: π_{n}(f) = π_{n}(g) : π_{n}(X) → π_{n}(Y).
Timelike homotopyEdit
On a Lorentzian manifold, certain curves are distinguished as timelike. A timelike homotopy between two timelike curves is a homotopy such that each intermediate

A reader requests clarification of this page's material to reduce confusion. You can help clarify material, request assistance, or view current progress. 
curve is timelike. No closed timelike curve (CTC) on a Lorentzian manifold is timelike homotopic to a point (that is, null timelike homotopic); such a manifold is therefore said to be multiply connected by timelike curves. A manifold such as the 3sphere can be simply connected (by any type of curve), and yet be timelike multiply connected.[1]
Homotopy lifting propertyEdit
If we have a homotopy H : X × [0,1] → Y and a cover p : Y → Y and we are given a map h_{0} : X → Y such that H_{0} = p ○ h_{0} (h_{0} is called a lift of h_{0}), then we can lift all H to a map H : X × [0,1] → Y such that p ○ H = H. The homotopy lifting property is used to characterize fibrations.
Homotopy extension propertyEdit
Another useful property involving homotopy is the homotopy extension property, which characterizes the extension of a homotopy between two functions from a subset of some set to the set itself. It is useful when dealing with cofibrations.
IsotopyEdit
In case the two given continuous functions f and g from the topological space X to the topological space Y are embeddings, one can ask whether they can be connected 'through embeddings'. This gives rise to the concept of isotopy, which is a homotopy, H, in the notation used before, such that for each fixed t, H(x,t) gives an embedding.^{[2]}
A related, but different, concept is that of ambient isotopy.
Requiring that two embeddings be isotopic is a stronger requirement than that they be homotopic. For example, the map from the interval [−1,1] into the real numbers defined by f(x) = −x is not isotopic to the identity g(x) = x. Any homotopy from f to the identity would have to exchange the endpoints, which would mean that they would have to 'pass through' each other. Moreover, f has changed the orientation of the interval and g has not, which is impossible under an isotopy. However, the maps are homotopic; one homotopy from f to the identity is H: [−1,1] × [0,1] → [−1,1] given by H(x,y) = 2yxx.
Two homeomorphisms (which are special cases of embeddings) of the unit ball which agree on the boundary can be shown to be isotopic using Alexander's trick. For this reason, the map of the unit disc in R^{2} defined by f(x,y) = (−x, −y) is isotopic to a 180degree rotation around the origin, and so the identity map and f are isotopic because they can be connected by rotations.
The unknot is not equivalent to the Trefoil knot since one cannot be deformed into the other through a continuous path of embeddings. Thus they are not ambient isotopic.
In geometric topology—for example in knot theory—the idea of isotopy is used to construct equivalence relations. For example, when should two knots be considered the same? We take two knots, K_{1} and K_{2}, in threedimensional space. A knot is an embedding of a onedimensional space, the "loop of string" (or the circle), into this space, and this embedding gives a homeomorphism between the circle and its image in the embedding space. The intuitive idea behind the notion of knot equivalence is that one can deform one embedding to another through a path of embeddings: a continuous function starting at t=0 giving the K_{1} embedding, ending at t=1 giving the K_{2} embedding, with all intermediate values corresponding to embeddings. This corresponds to the definition of isotopy. An ambient isotopy, studied in this context, is an isotopy of the larger space, considered in light of its action on the embedded submanifold. Knots K_{1} and K_{2} are considered equivalent when there is an ambient isotopy which moves K_{1} to K_{2}. This is the appropriate definition in the topological category.
Similar language is used for the equivalent concept in contexts where one has a stronger notion of equivalence. For example a path between two smooth embeddings is a smooth isotopy.
ApplicationsEdit
Based on the concept of the homotopy, computation methods for algebraic and differential equations have been developed. The methods for algebraic equations include the homotopy continuation method ^{[3]} and the continuation method. The methods for differential equations include the homotopy analysis method.
See alsoEdit
ReferencesEdit
 ↑ http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/104515/pathhomotopyandseparatelycontinuousfunctions
 ↑ Template:MathWorld
 ↑ Allgower, Eugene. "Introduction to Numerical Continuation Methods". CSU. ftp://210.45.114.81/math/%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C%E7%9B%AE%E5%BD%95/Computing/Introduction%20to%20numerical%20continuation%20methods%20(Colorado%201990%20Allgower%20397s).pdf. Retrieved 3 January 2013.
 Armstrong, M.A. (1979). Basic Topology. Springer. ISBN 0387908390.
 Template:Springer
 Template:Springer
 Spanier, Edwin (December 1994). Algebraic Topology. Springer. ISBN 0387944265.