Quantum Nanotechnology/Space (Time) Smaller Than Quanta

Space (Time) Smaller Than QuantaEdit

Aside from value-based measurements and energy, the smallest definition of what is supposed to be nothing, does not sufficiently explain the finiteness of space (time) and how far it might go.

A strange ambiguity in velocities corresponds to this. The speed of light is 186,242.8 mi/second. That is to say that light speed as a four-velocity massless energy form, which creates speed is an oddity. But this is no different than asking how chemicals can possess life, much more particles – suggesting intelligence. But an organism is composed of chemicals and it has life.

The speed of light is to say that light travels over a distance of 186,282.4 miles in 1 second. Because the speed of light is a fixed constant neither increasing nor decreasing in speed – it remains unchanging apart from external interventions (input) to increase or decrease it’s speed so it would be applicable to assume that any increase in it’s speed would produce a shorter traversal time over vast distances. Naturally at c light travels over it’s normal distance in 1 second.

Double the distance (372,564.8 miles), the speed of light travels over this distance in 2 seconds. With more distance, a longer arrival time and hence this translates into light years.

In essence on a clear summer night when the stars are out you can see the light from those stars, which are billions of miles away. That light, which you can see is actually light that has come from the past – light you see now, traveled millions of light years to appear to your retina, it is light from the past, not light which you can see now, although it has taken that long just to reach us.

Now the reference here is to distance, and 186,282.4 is the marker of measurement indicating arrival. The arrival as is leaving are imaginary references as is a point on the outer circumference of a spinning object indicating RPS. However for this argument let us alter the distance for the speed of light to half the amount while leaving the value of the photon’s traversal-time unaltered.

The arrival now is 186,282.4 / 2 = 93,141.2 miles, which is approximately equal to ½ second. Further descriptions are not necessary because the point becomes obvious to the fact that time changes with respect to alterations in distance. Supposedly zero is the equilibrator between the negative and the positive realms, one, which runs a deficit, such as that in exotic energies in Quantum Tunneling.

The negative energy borrows against the positive to tunnel it’s way through a small barrier. Which can be taken to mean the limits of space (time) with respect to energy. With Potential Energy and Kinetic Energy the two are un-isolatable yet interdependently interchangeable provided a manual energy source to stimulate them into actualizations of each other temporarily. This must mean then that energy, manually established, is operated in whole amounts and according the High-Low space (time) is fractionated. Just like playing a game with wagers, we bet in whole amounts, therefore anything above $1 is considered as a whole amount.

This suggests, then, that we are going about things all wrong we should be betting in fractionations not whole amounts! Why? Because the game is based on fractionations not whole numbers, just as the High-Low indicates corresponding to the manual establishments of energy.

And zero is the limit, right?

The instance is that of manually based energy, it’s limitation at the most finite of distances marks off a value ending at zero except where compression signals further compromise. Let a line-segment correspond to actual space (time).

Twelve positions constituting the relationship of imaginary references indicating value-based energy measurements with respect to space (time) are defined at c. (Eq 12)

Initial Number Set

With respect to space (time) two positions as they are defined by energy cannot possess “space” between them; instead two positions are interpreted as two possible outcomes or potentials for energy statistically. The indication here is that of manual induction being one source for the explanation of those positions. The entire explanation is that positions are simply just measurements that come about when energy becomes established and have no real basis in space (time) itself except when energy is present. With respect to space (time) the indication from the imaginary reference point does not hold where energy is absent to show “position” in space (time) with respect to energy.

In the absence of feedback energy is manual, excluding the lives of particles and corresponding phenomena. Manually based energy, like exotic energy in Quantum Tunneling is in debt to it’s origin, potential energy and perfect feedback DO NOT go outside the - they are automating. From the interdependent relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy degrees of freedom are putout (output) by the input of manual energy absent of a feedback.

Momentum in a photon’s four-velocity motion reveals that in it energy originates from the rapid interchange between the two indicated at the crests and troughs of the photon’s wave/particle duality. (That is from kinetic energy to potential energy and back again in an arc). That is to express that all manually induced motion in straight-lines are inter-dependencies on the remaining three, and not just appearances of one with the disappearances of the others.

While such rapid interchanges between kinetic energy and potential energy are in an arc to produce momentum, to produce wavitic, straight-line motion, we have then the avoidance of potential energy by constant change in direction. (delta d). Conserved. Stops and starts in delta d produce potential energy while in arcs it is conserved or avoided. Which essentially indicates that it would be better to travel in arcs to get from one place to another over vast distance. But can one go in an arc while traveling in straight lines? No. Why? Because debt to potential energy is still present in manually based energy establishments. Time travel is not present and this is the only true road to FTL.

Do you remember our base in fractionations? What does this indicate?

Although curved, a faster interchange does not indicate FTL since light is limited to this speed in the first place according to Einstein absolutes. Energy accumulation is the rate of accumulation per unit time. Accumulation can be defined by the repetitive inputs of manual energy to produce the outputs duplicating the inputs.

If it were feasible to introduce a feedback into the “rate of delta”, the rate of change would, timitically reduce to a minimum the time of accumulation to almost zero. At least for mass-less energy. But and even so it would still be “trapped within it’s own equidistant degrees of freedom.

Let a line-segment possess two df below each enumerated position as it is indicated by the High-Low. (Eq 13)

High-Low Directions

Positions 1 and 12 by definition of

Manually based energy in debt to it’s origin are the df that energy has the potential for at 1 position and therefore 1-df or 1 possibility. At 1 and 12 df has no space-apart from itself-to-itself and is therefore indicated as zero.

Let a space-apart be the possible directions energy can assume and to 1 position and back parallel. Reading from the primary upper half of the High-Low from 1 to 2 is therefore one space-apart, 1 to 3 is two spaces-apart. 1 to 4 is 3 spaces-apart and on through to the right to 12 in this set.

The secondary half (the Low) is identical to the upper half of the two, only reversed by direction to indicate 2 directions, running to the left. Probabilistically at a current position indicated by an outcome by some chance, say 10, (square), indicates the next possible outcomes that the current numeral 10 can go into by the two numbers below it, underneath 10 (square) in the initial set.

10 (square) therefore possesses 9 (triangle) it can go into, to the left, while underneath 9 (triangle) 2 (circle) indicates that 9 (triangle) possesses two possible numbers it can go into from 9 (triangle) to the right. Since 9 (triangle) is greater than 2 (circle) the greatest potential for 10 to go into either set, next, lies with 9 (triangle), which we shall term the range.

While corresponding to the next outcome 10 can deviate from the range, from 9 (triangle), into those numbers to the right with less potency, plus one repeat depending on which number appears as the current number throughout the set. Basically this is a prediction indicator, which I have found is perhaps the closet thing to predicting the next event next to predicting events with 100% accuracy. Be sure that the High-Low cannot create an exact science. (Eq 14)

High-Low Directions2

For this particular number set corresponding to a line-segment with respect to actual space (time) upper and lower halves of the High-Low invert at the mid-section where a dashed-line indicates the inversion point. (Eq 15)

The Inversion Point

Dissimilar number sets reveal the inversion point as being on either side of a central number in the initial number set. R to D is different here. How does this explain the dual nature of a single line-segment possessing two degrees of freedom? Two in one? The reason behind this is that due to fractionations. An intelligent design that says that the whole is greater than the sum of it's parts. In other words the whole is made up of fractionations, while the fractionations constitute the whole. (Eq 16)

View From Either Side

Assume that the twelve numbers representing twelve positions (originating from energy, corresponding to space (time)) with respect to (space (time) are determined by a photon’s shortest timitic traversal.

Between two positions from A and B for photon 1. A finite time differential exists between the two possibilities preventing simultaneity. “Barrier”. Since the finite time between the two is equal and opposite, and delta D (change-in distance) would result delta t and hence changes in outcomes, signifying possible travel time via malleability of space (time) distances. If we were to attempt just this without resorting to negative or exotic materials through manual inducement we might proceed to create delta D to produce delta t via millions of magnetic reversals throughout an independent beam of photons operated by feedback unto automation. Precise. Equal and opposite delta D succeeding prior delta D.

Previous delta D are eliminated so that each are diverse one to the other. The unequal delta d begins in one direction unequal to the next delta d and continues. Delta d to cause delta D excludes the entire distance in both directions, but one can be used if the other is unequal as a rule. Assuming delta d transpires at position 10 out of a set of 12. The primary spaces apart are 11 to the right and left for a total of 22. Successive delta d must now be unequal to the previous delta d to constitute 1 delta D.

The secondary d therefore transpires at position 4, by/for the energy itself and not a consequence or misaligned argument to assume that positions exist apart from any manifestation of energy. The next  continues to be unequal to the last; either shorter or longer as do the others that go on to produce D by d. Since D are influenced, affecting space (time) by duplication, changes in t correspond to changes in outcomes which may be interpreted as the production of FTL.

We may therefore gather that gravity is inherent to energy by change d with respect to E. Provided this, if the energy were enabled for sending (and arriving) via feedback to a prior time at the same time it left, the energy could go FTL provided each trip back to the same time arrives in a new space.

I refer to this as Aleo-de-logical travel. (We Will Expound on this in Preceding Chapters)

Therefore:

                         delta d = delta D = delta t

Direction change would be constant throughout the line-segment and therefore potential energy by gravity would be avoided, but repetition rates would still prevail absent of simultaneity. The first set of unequal transitions goes to the right beginning from 1 where delta d = delta D; are unequal changes in D resulting in multiple delta t.

Sets A) and B) avoid equivalent interactions if at all feasible.

A) Right

1,2. 1,3. 1,5. 1,6. 1,7. 1,8. 1,9. 1,10. 1,11. 1,12.
2,3. 2,4. 2,5. 2,6. 2,7. 2,8. 2,9. 2,10. 2,11. 2,12.
3,4. 3,5. 3,6. 3,7. 3,8. 3,9. 3,10. 3,11. 3,12.
4,5. 4,6. 4,7. 4,8. 4,9. 4,10. 4,11. 4,12.
5,6. 5,7. 5,8. 5,9. 5,10. 5,11. 5,12.
6,7. 6,8. 6,9. 6,10. 6,11.6,12.
7,8. 7,9. 7,10. 7,11. 7,12.
8,9. 8,10. 8,11. 8,12.
9,10. 9,11.9,12.
10,11. 10,12.
11,12.

T =66

B) Left

12,11. 12,10. 12,9. 12,8. 12,7. 12,6. 12,5. 12,4. 12,3. 12,2. 12,1.
11,10. 11,9. 11,8. 11,7. 11,6. 11,5. 11,4. 11,3. 11,2. 11,1.
10,9. 10,8. 10,7. 10,6. 10,5. 10,4. 10,3. 10,2. 10,1.
9,8. 9,7. 9,6. 9,5. 9,4. 9,3. 9,2. 9,1.
8,7. 8,6. 8,5. 8,4. 8,3. 8,2. 8,1.
7,6. 7,5. 7,4. 7,3. 7,2. 7,1.
6,5. 6,4. 6,3. 6,2. 6,1.
5,4. 5,3. 5,2. 5,1.
4,3. 4,2. 4,1.
3,2. 3,1.
2,1.

T=67 66+67=133

For 12 positions an estimated 17, 689 possibilities exists in one line-segment via d equidistantly and unequidistantly.

II.Edit

Accordingly all forms of energy possess the same qualities of being repetitive in an equidistant number of df through the relation:

                      delta E = Ndf / Ndelta df

We can envision all material forms and photons as being able to reciprocate within its own equidistant degrees of freedom from the axis or center of gravity. Generally all energy possesses a split-decisional dependency relationship within space in a probabilistic, repetitive set of df with respect to current time. Equidistant repetitive outcomes to each event where energy is present, separated only by delta E, delta d - delta D simultaneity. Timitically, taking all these equidistant df might mean time (travel) Aleodelogically.

While Global Causality Violation (GCV) (Tipler,Frank J., Physical Review D,1974) suggests traversal through time – it does not suggest that arrival to THE past will occur due to THE path of the interdependent energy remaining in THE now.

Is interdependency therefore automation due to communication? The differentials between “A” time and “THE” time. (Interpreted from GCV)

Perceivables indicate THE past as not being A past. A present (The now) following is current and up-to-date and thus is not A present. From THE past, this is clearly THE future. THE future next is potential time under causality and be-comes A future out of all possible. We have then THE, THE and A with reference to the split. Thus the fracture here between THE time and A time is split at current time between THE now and A possible now. Initially it is this instance that gives the impression of parallel universes, which are actually alternate time-lines.


If therefore time is indeed interdependent as exemplified by reciprocating energy at specific distances, then it would tend to indicate that in order to travel and emerge through time – all elements of time pertinent to THE outcome are required to arrive in THE past, THE present or THE future. Otherwise any claims of time travel are skewed by the existence alternate time-lines and outcomes.

As we have learned from this investigation space (time) does not require any outside intervention to function and thus by whatever assigned feedback (Perhaps by communication, perhaps interdependency) or communication it is automated. Therefore those measurements that correspond to space (time) which originate from manually based energies do not completely describe space (time) in terms of automation annated hence are manual – which are accommodated in space (time) but has little to do with it. That is – how can a value-based measurement depict space (time), which originates from energy – which is manually induced – when space (time) is automated? Can an autonumeric system with new operators explain space (time) properly?

With respect to GCV and a light ring independent from it’s source, time is interdependent, where RPS represents t about a variable D, leading via repetition back to THE now (i.e. the path has not changed) from the future appearing to arrive but always leaving. The question surfaces as to weather time (travel) (If it is by travel) only are possible in fractionations up to +1-1? Repetitions indicated by an imaginary reference point on the outer circumference of a laser light ring in GCV shows arrival as not actually occurring and therefore arrival never transpires before leaving even at the tiniest scale where one photon is left.

Thus, a causality light ring following the path of a 360 degree circle never diverges to A past, A future or A now. Mass-less energy decidedly whips through space, time leaving from THE now on THE path (Reader comprehend) back, back to THE now. The path begun is therefore the path’s end. And because the repeat-ion is equidistant spacially and timitically – mass-less energy goes nowhere, spacially or timitically, except on the same path.

While I have repeatedly pointed out the same subjects in different lights, it is necessary to give more insight to the subject matter at hand for a very special argument, which I will get to soon.

This suggests that energy as well as matter are constrained within a countable, equidistant number of degrees of freedom where it is as well as we are subject to them and unable to go beyond them under normal relativistic circumstances even at the speed of light, almost as if we are it were a program in it, as that corresponding to the Matrix film trilogy.

Since all these “possibilities”, equidistantly are repetitive uniformly as well as with the input of more energy – obedient to probability (And absent of simultaneity) repetitiously, the only way to escape these constraints and permit new “possibilities” is with time travel.

The suggestive nature of this is that time traversing cannot be accomplished using manually-based inducements and cannot be done in whole amounts – since the High-Low representing an actual segment of space (time) indicates that space (time) is fractionated as well as automated. But can be done in fractionations up to but not beyond +1. Give or take +1-1. (99.9%). Duplicating the differences between THE outcome and An outcome.

What appears to result is an “uncertain condition”, “from” 0 to 99.9% of +1, where at the condition below +1 or whole when established. 100 / 100 = -1. Here zero is avoided as it too is a whole integer and, as a game based on probability cannot win with whole numbers – only fractionated numbers up to 1 cent can win in the long run, only here we are referring to unequal changes in direction to cause changes in distance to cause changes in time, which is the only way to cause changes in time because, initially we are not starting with time to cause changes in distance, but can be reversed once the proper process is satisfactorily done.

IIIEdit

Assuming all value-based quantities, there is a persistent satisfaction in the gathering of knowledge to comprehend the components of a subject matter’s properties. A line-segment corresponding to space (time) possesses two-dimensions – which are the directions of the line-segment. The sum of it’s constituent one, a whole equivalent.

The whole constitutes fractionations that summarize the whole. These fractures corresponding to opposing directions (and not that they are in any way opposed), from the High – Low examples give way to probables.

As this relates to energy, any difference between any two positions, (established through the establishment of energy), in relative proximity one to the other are represented by the High – Low, (Remember, no space can exist between any two positions established through the establishment of energy) are indicated by fractionations resulting in two possible directions/outcomes from one position.

(The inference here is moot with respect to two positions having no space between them when energy is established).

The finite timitic differential in A and B exists to undermine the possibility for simultaneity, respectively. Which means nothing more and nothing less than indicating that externally based, manually operated energy cannot cause FTL, rather, that automated energy can. Which further signifies, that at present, mankind is doing this all wrong concerning interstellar travel and teleportation. Because FTL and teleportation cannot be accomplished by using manually - based energy forms to establish Faster Than Light Travel nor bring about isolated forms of exotic energy and matter including those pertaining to negative matter. Direction may be chosen equally or unequally is determined, at first, through manually based energy and then automation takes over through feedback input.

Sub-dividing the fractionations that represent the opposite directions of the line – segment, as a whole to the finites that equate to zero. (Here is where things start getting weird). (Eq 17)

Strange Inversion of Spacetime

As one can see the High – Low h up by it’s upper portion three strange precursors that are set up toward potentiality. Which one do you suppose is the correct one? Panel (A) cannot be the correct one because when it goes to zero, the High-Low would then go into the negative range.

Panel (B) is not correct either, because 1 comes before zero, and has not transpired yet. Panel (C) on the other hand, is it correct.

The answer is no.

What?

Now you might say that that is impossible, that one of the panels toward inversion is correct, however in panel (C), zero is still present in the High – Low and therefore it too would become negative once going into zero. Thus the correct answer is 1, 1, 1. Then when 1, 1, 1 become 0, 0,0 0 will be positive. Also these three panels would lead to negative positive zeros, and one cannot have positive zeros in negative realms, especially where an inversion of space (time) takes place.

The differentials between (+) positive and (-) negative, cancellation as would be with neutral results obtained between particles of opposite assignments where 0 = +1 – 1. However the logic in assuming that subtraction in this manner leads zero is unmistakably flawed.

The fraction related to the High – Low constituting the whole unit of 1 originates as a fraction along with it’s neighboring counterparts is unequal. (That is that an initial number set marked by an underlying High – Low, is, fractionated. Thus subtracting numbers from an initial set toward inversion, would appear to be done to a whole number – which of course cannot necessarily be – because of fractionation).

Therefore the sub-divisions by subtraction do not result in equal positive and negative integers for both halves of a fraction. One side after sub-dividing arrives at a positive zero, while the other in the assignment of a positive integer above zero.

Where 0/1 thus is, because positive zeros cannot exist in negative realms, it would be appropriate to assume a (- 0) as existing before complete inversion takes place in the negative. Here although we will overlook this rounding off important numerals. As inversion occurs (and assumably space (time)) -1/0 transpires and the negative world surfaces and therefore -2/-1. However at 0/1 or 1/0, 1 represents the final unit the sub-division as does the fractionations that constitute the original 1 before sub-division was initiated and therefore must undergo further sub-dividing that constitute this 1 arrived at by the original sub-dividing, but does not begin at 0/1 or 1/0 rather 1/2 or 2/1. There is no 1/1 here.

Thus 0 in this is never ascertained as such appears to continue corresponding to the High-Low finitely, add infinitum. The second half of the fraction remains table, at 2 and only changes with the other side of the fraction’s transformation by whole amounts.

Thus if one half at 1 is undergoing sub-division, then until that half again reaches 1/2, 2 for the secondary half will not transform into 1 until primary half begins to undergo sub-division of 1.

             * ½ --> + 9/10/2…    ½ /2 --> 9/8/2 / 9/7

*Example only, does not indicate proper math.

Obviously at 1, 99.9 positions cannot be “laid-out” in a High – Low for every change. The other facet in this is that 2 does not undergo a change into, 1 after it, itself sub-divides into 1 by the sub-division of the other half of 1.

                         * ½ --> 9/8 /19.6… --> 9/8/2 /1

*Example only, does not indicate proper math.

However logically, none of this makes sense. Sub-dividing fractionations already fractionated work by whole numbers, so to sub-divide this complicates matters. Does each position constitute a repeat where df constitute repeats? Change(s) in time, (delta t). Changes in distance (delta D) equate to changes in time delta t. delta D = delta t. I suppose the next question might be when or where? By delta d? What therefore does delta t equal? delta t determined by change-in (delta) the size of repetitions. How do repeats occur?


If we have a matrix consisting of 55 numbers, and 5 numbers with each of it’s own df are spread out across 5 panels, we may assume that individually there are 55 webs (df for each number) thus 55 combinations with 3, 025 permutations. For a total of around 9,150,625 combinations and permutations for each number which possesses a web. An imaginary reference for repeats here is difficult unless we assume that the 5 numbers move as a unit.

Thus repeats occur in 5`s even though all numbers do eventually repeat. If, in that repeats occur in 5`s, then there are 55 total repeats and therefore if we desire to find the imaginary reference, where, timitically repeats can be found, we must thus divide 55 by 5. 55 / 5 = 275 and 275 = 11 = 250. Yet if we build a web for all 55 numbers, we see that a number exists in every web up to 15 or 16. It is plausible to assume that delta d for energy is control to causing delta D = delta t.

Frequencies make up everything, while information constitutes the essence of all finite energies. Obviously to control the things that make up these frequencies means that the information that causes it in the first place must be known. That would be an ultimate form of control because just about everything that consists of energy communicates, some of these are automated and some are partial, thus to control the information that makes up a thing, be that quanta or no, the information in it must first be controlled.

First magnetic reversal is the essence of rapidly shifting dualistic poles. Changing these poles via reversal, inversion or shifting them is the result of equidistant shifts in direction throughout all positions in a line-segment.

This, it is equal and opposite. With such magnetic reversals are no delta D. And like the circumferential distance of a causality light ring’s distance contracting and expanding, these reverberations so to speaks are duplicated by space (time) causing changes in distance by changes in direction resulting in changes in time.


Therefore:

                          P22 = delta d = -delta D

Where P22 or P22 are the positions of value-based energy with respect to space (time) throughout a High-Low as are measured initially in a line-segment by energy. Feedback to continue the process in an automated manner. Unequally are the changes in distance.

The issue of the source is not one where manual interventions play a role to dampen the ability of the magnetic reversal’s competence to acquire simultaneity via time travel or Aleodelogically, but entirely automatic by feedback, and then perhaps Aleodlogically. Thus specifically the unequal delta d, which results in delta D are designable to cause delta t.

In this case we may tackle the obstacle of nullifying even isolating E and strengthening gravity in Pe.

ConclusionsEdit

What relation then may we establish a reference whereby delta t can be measured so as to indicate the proper change in time in unequal delta D by delta d that give the delta t toward a specific goal such as to that of Aleodelogical travel. Unlike a causality light ring, the distance is fixed. Here the distance is constantly changing, unequally. Direction in a light ring constantly changes; here it is only assigned when time travel is acquired without necessarily bypassing, as does the mass-less energy in the causality light ring.

Thus the reference for equal repetitions are assigned at a fixed imaginary reference point(s) from which it left depending on the controlled combination it will permutate to after returning to the imaginary reference point(s). If it is construed to be entirely random, then the shifting will be constantly changing.

For mass-less energy the origin of position with respect to space (time) has no relationship to space (time) apart from that as it is measured from manual energy bases. We might assume that through the incorporation of automated magnetic reversal(s) equal delta D are all that would be necessary to cause delta t for concerned purposes that reflect these goals.


Properly equal delta D succeeding prior delta D and previous delta D are eliminated in the processes so that each are unequal to one to the other. The general automated process of the unequal delta d begins in one direction unequal to the next delta d and continues. delta d to cause delta D excludes the entire distance in both directions, one can be used provided the secondary one is unequal to it. The automated, mass-less energy of delta d would start at positions 1 0 out of 12. With respect to the High-Low, the primary spaces apart are 11 to the right and left for a total 22. A succeeding delta d must be unequal to a previous delta d to constitute one delta D.

The secondary delta d therefore transpires at position 4. The next continues to be unequal either shorter or longer up to the repeat where a combination completes for a shift in the imaginary reference(s) with respect to the df and moving for a new permutation. Since delta D are influential, affecting space (time) duplication, changes in t correspond to changes in outcomes, which may be interpreted to produce FTL in conjunction with Aleodelogical time travel.

Where a trip back (even in the most finite amount) is arranged to arrive in THE past (must be on the same path to do this, or outcome will be A and not THE) (but in a new space). (space (time), new space, Aleodelogical).

                        delta d = delta D = delta t.

Direction change would be constant and therefore potential energy would be avoided (conserved) not simultaneous, unequal but repetition rates would still prevail. Hence to go beyond equidistant df constraining energy and matter, time travel is necessary to create new possibilities.

The first set of transitions go to the right beginning with 1, where delta d = delta D are unequal changes in D resulting in delta t, sets A) and B) respectively avoid equal interactions.

A) Right

1,2. 1,3. 1,5. 1,6. 1,7. 1,8. 1,9. 1,10. 1,11. 1,12.
2,3. 2,4. 2,5. 2,6. 2,7. 2,8. 2,9. 2,10. 2,11. 2,12.
3,4. 3,5. 3,6. 3,7. 3,8. 3,9. 3,10. 3,11. 3,12.
4,5. 4,6. 4,7. 4,8. 4,9. 4,10. 4,11. 4,12.
5,6. 5,7. 5,8. 5,9. 5,10. 5,11. 5,12.
6,7. 6,8. 6,9. 6,10. 6,11.6,12.
7,8. 7,9. 7,10. 7,11. 7,12.
8,9. 8,10. 8,11. 8,12.
9,10. 9,11.9,12.
10,11. 10,12.
11,12.

T=66

B) Left

12,11. 12,10. 12,9. 12,8. 12,7. 12,6. 12,5. 12,4. 12,3. 12,2. 12,1.
11,10. 11,9. 11,8. 11,7. 11,6. 11,5. 11,4. 11,3. 11,2. 11,1.
10,9. 10,8. 10,7. 10,6. 10,5. 10,4. 10,3. 10,2. 10,1.
9,8. 9,7. 9,6. 9,5. 9,4. 9,3. 9,2. 9,1.
8,7. 8,6. 8,5. 8,4. 8,3. 8,2. 8,1.
7,6. 7,5. 7,4. 7,3. 7,2. 7,1.
6,5. 6,4. 6,3. 6,2. 6,1.
5,4. 5,3. 5,2. 5,1.
4,3. 4,2. 4,1.
3,2. 3,1.
2,1.

T=67 66+67=133

Last modified on 8 June 2010, at 00:08