Past LSAT Explained/Method of Argument(LR)
Type edit
It is mentioned as one possible reason for adopting a policy for which the author suggests an additional reason.
Taking the highest score among multiple LSAT scores may relieve test anxiety for many law school applicants. As critics point out, however, it also encourages students to take the test multiple times, incurring unnecessary costs and time for test preparation. Yet, since the ABA statistics show that the highest score is the better predictor for law school performance than the average score, law schools should change their policy to consider the highest test score rather than the average.
Type edit
It is a claim that the author attempts to refute with counterarguments. The admissions officer argues that the average score of all LSAT taken is the best measure of the applicant's ability. This is clearly nonsense. Suppose we have one college senior who received a 160 and then a 172. Compare this person with another who received 166 twice. Can we say their abilities are equal? How about someone who got a 172 the first time and 160 the second time due to illness? People who have one score are usually do not take it again because they are satified with the score and often they believe it is the highest possible score.
Type edit
It is a hypothesis for which the teacher offers additional evidence.
Type edit
It is cited as an insufficient reason for elimination.
Type edit
It is cited as an objection that has been raised to the position the author is supporting.
Type edit
The argument proceeds by
Type edit
a method of reasoning employed by the argument
Type edit
a technique of reasoning employed by the argument
Type edit
X responds by
Type edit
responds in which one of the following ways
Type edit
uses which one of the following techniques in countering
Type edit
the role of the argument X in the argument is
Type edit
the statement X figures in the argument in which one of the following ways
Type edit
the statement X plays which of the following roles in the argument?
Type edit
It presents the conclusion of the argument.
Type edit
It makes a key word in the argument more precise.
Type edit
It illustrates a consequence of one of the claims that are used to support the conclusion.
Type edit
It distracts attention from the point at issue.
Type edit
It concedes a point that is then used to support the conclusion.