HSME |

Content |
---|

Matrices |

Recurrence Relations |

Problems & Projects |

Problem Set |

Project |

Soultions |

Exercises Solutions |

Problem Set Solutions |

Misc. |

Definition Sheet |

Full Version |

## *Linear recurrence relations revisited*Edit

We have already discussed linear recurrence relations in the Counting and Generating functions chapter. We shall study it again using matrices. Consider the Fibonacci numbers

- 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21...

where each number is the sum of two preceding numbers. Let *x*_{n} be the (*n* + 1)th Fibonacci number, we can write:

In fact many linear recurrence relations can be expressed in matrix form , e.g.

can be expressed as

and therefore

So if we knew how to compute the powers of matrices quickly then we can work out the (*n* + 1)th Fibonacci number rather quickly!

### Computing Powers QuicklyEdit

Note that from now on we emphasise if a matrix is a vector by writing an arrow on top of it.

Consider

Something interesting happens when you multiply *A* by either or (*Try it*). In fact

and

- .

Generally for a matrix *B*, if a vector *w* ≠ *0* (the matrix with all entries zero) such that

for some scalar λ, then is called a eigenvector of *B* and λ the eigenvalue of *B* (corresponding to *w*).

This is a feature of matrices that be exploited to compute powers easily. Here's how, using *A*, *x* and *y* from above, we write the two pieces of information together in matrix form:

or written completely in numeral form

you are encouraged to check the above is correct. What we did was we merged and into a matrix using each vector as a column, next we multiplied it by the diagonal matrix whose entries are the *eigenvalue* of each *eigenvector* correspondingly.

How to now exploit this matrix form to calculate powers of *A* quickly? We require a simple but ingenius step -- post-multiply (i.e. multiply from the right) both sides by the inverse of

we have

Now to calculate *A*^{n}, we need only to do

but inverses multiply to give *I*, so we are left with

which is very easy to compute since powers of a diagonal matrix are easy to compute (just take each entry to the power).

#### Example 1Edit

Compute *A*^{5} where *A* is given above.

**Solution** We do

#### Example 2Edit

Let

and its eigenvectors are

- and

Calculate *B*^{5} directly (optional), and again using the method above.

**Solution** We need to first determine its eigenvalues. We do

so the eigenvalue corresponding to

is 1.

Similarly,

so the other eigenvalue is 3.

Now we write them in the form:

now make *B* the subject

Now

- so multiplying the right hand side out, we get

#### Summary -- compute powers quicklyEdit

Given eigenvectors of a matrix *A*

- Compute the eigenvalues (if not given)
- Write in the form
*A*=*PDP*^{-1}, where*D*is a diagonal matrix of the eigenvalues, and*P*the eigenvectors as columns - Compute
*A*^{n}using the right hand side equivalent

#### ExercisesEdit

1. The eigenvectors of

are

- and

calculate *B*^{5}

2. The eigenvectors of

are

- and

calculate *B*^{5}

3. The eigenvectors of

are

- and

calculate *B*^{5}

### Eigenvector and eigenvalueEdit

We know from the above section that for a matrix if we are given its eigenvectors, we can find the corresponding eigenvalues, and then we can compute its powers quickly. So the last hurdle becomes finding the eigenvectors.

An eigenvectors of a matrix *A* and its corresponding eigenvalue λ are related by the following expression:

where x ≠ *0* where *0* is the zero matrix (all entries zero). We can safely assume that *A* is given so there are two unknowns -- and λ. We have enough information now to be able to work out the eigenvalues (and from that the eigenvectors):

The matrix (*A* - λ*I*) must *NOT* have an inverse, because if it does then = *0*. Therefore det(*A* - λ*I*) = 0. Suppose

then

Now we see det(A-λI) is a polynomial in λ and det(*A*-λ*I*) = 0. We are already well-trained in solving quadratics, so it's easy to work out the values of λ. Once we've worked out the values of λ, we can work out (see examples).

#### Example 1Edit

Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of

and then find *D* and *P* such that *A* = *P*^{-1}*DP*.

**Solution**

We aim to find and λ such that

- A = λ

we proceed

- (**)

- det(
*A*- λ*I*) = - 0 = (-4 - λ)(7 - λ) + 30
- 0 = -28 - 3λ + λ
^{2}+ 30 - 0 = λ
^{2}- 3λ + 2 - 0 = (λ - 1)(λ - 2)
- λ = 1, 2

Now for each eigenvalue we will get a different corresponding eigenvector. So we consider the case λ = 1 and λ = 2 separately.

Consider first λ = 1, from (**) we get

i.e.

where since det(*A* - λ*I*) = 0, we know that there is no *unique* solution to the above equation. But we note that:

for any real number *t* is a solution, and we choose *t* = 1 as our solution because it's the simpliest. Therefore

is the eigenvector corresponding to λ = 1. (***)

Similarly, if λ = 2, from (**) we get

i.e.

where we note that:

for any real number *t* is a solution, as before we choose *t* = 1 as our solution. Therefore

- is the eigenvector corresponding to λ = 2. (****)

We summarise the result of (***) and (****), we have

we combine the results into one

and so

#### Example 2Edit

- a) Diagonalize
*A*, i.e find*P*(invertible) and*B*(diagonal) such that*AP*=*PB* - b) Compute
*A*^{5}

' *Solution a) We are solving*

**Ax**a column vector. Firstly

*= λ*x*, where λ is a constant and*xsince **x** ≠ 0 we have

i.e.

For λ = 3,

Clearly

is a solution. Note that we do not accept *x* = 0 as an solution, because we assume *x* ≠ 0. Note also that

for some constant *t* is also a solution. Indeed we could use *x* = *y* = 2, 3 or 4 as a solution, but for convenience we choose the simplest i.e. *x* = *y* = 1.

For λ = 2,

Clearly

is a solution.

Therefore

is a solution and

is also a solution.

- b)

#### Example 3Edit

Solve the linear recurrence relation

**Solution**

We need to diagonalize

we proceed:

we get

- λ = 2, 3

For λ = 2

For λ = 3

Therefore

Now

Therefore

i.e

### ExercisesEdit

1. Compute *A*^{5} where

2. Compute *A*^{5} where

3. Solve the following recurrence relations

**Solutions**

1.

2.

## More ApplicationsEdit

*...more to come*

**Problem Set >** High_School_Mathematics_Extensions/Matrices/Problem Set

**Project >** High_School_Mathematics_Extensions/Matrices/Project/Elementary_Matrices

# FeedbackEdit

**What do you think?** Too easy or too hard? Too much information or not enough? How can we improve? Please let us know by leaving a comment in the discussion section. Better still, edit it yourself and make it better.

To tell the truth ,I haven't finished it. The theories included are not difficult for me because I have studied a little game theory. But, the passage is a little long for me, and I am not very interested in certain parts. It's maybe a little too much information for me. I will try to finish it. Thank you!

I was directed here for information before taking cryptography I. This was a good review of probability rules. A little disappointed that author didn't get back to the definition of independent events and continuous probability. And I don't know what happen at the end; it looked kind of cut off. But, overall it was a nice guide and thanks! - undergrad

Around the middle of the article, you introduced the notation of two numbers — one over the other — inside of parenthesis. There was no description of the meaning of this notation or how it is used.

I do not have a background in mathematics (In Fact, I was never any good at it). However, I have found this quite understandable for my novice capabilities. I was too referred here by my cryptography teacher. Now, I can look at his presentation with only one eye crossed. I am still a little confused about some of the information, such as binomial distribution. However, I will reread and see if I can understand.

Some sections got way to complex for me, with the info dumps.

I didn't get why the article started using a variable and "(1')" behind it. That was so confusing. The passage does not explain an actual use for matrices. I do know a little bit of vector math, but this wiki-book went from properties of matrices all the way to determinants way to fast.

Thank you, but I felt like some information was missing. Also, just a quick question. Is (n k) a column vector?

(n k) is not a column vector. It is a binomial coefficient https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_coefficient