The Pythagoras Theorem or the Pythagorean theorem, named after the Greek mathematician Pythagoras states that:

In any right triangle, the area of the square whose side is the hypotenuse (the side opposite the right angle) is equal to the sum of the areas of the squares whose sides are the two legs (the two sides that meet at a right angle).

This is usually summarized as follows:

The square of the hypotenuse of a right triangle is equal to the sum of the squares on the other two sides.

If we let *c* be the length of the hypotenuse and *a* and *b* be the lengths of the other two sides, the theorem can be expressed as the equation:

or, solved for *c*:

If *c* is already given, and the length of one of the legs must be found, the following equations can be used (The following equations are simply the converse of the original equation):

or

This equation provides a simple relation among the three sides of a right triangle so that if the lengths of any two sides are known, the length of the third side can be found. A generalization of this theorem is the law of cosines, which allows the computation of the length of the third side of any triangle, given the lengths of two sides and the size of the angle between them. If the angle between the sides is a right angle it reduces to the Pythagorean theorem.

## HistoryEdit

The history of the theorem can be divided into four parts: knowledge of Pythagorean triples, knowledge of the relationship between the sides of a right triangle, knowledge of the relationship between adjacent angles, and proofs of the theorem.

Megalithic monuments from circa 2500 BC in Egypt, and in Northern Europe, incorporate right triangles with integer sides. Bartel Leendert van der Waerden conjectures that these Pythagorean triples were discovered algebraically.

Written between 2000 and 1786 BC, the Middle Kingdom Egyptian papyrus *Berlin 6619* includes a problem whose solution is a Pythagorean triple.

During the reign of Hammurabi the Great, the Mesopotamian tablet *Plimpton 322*, written between 1790 and 1750 BC, contains many entries closely related to Pythagorean triples.

The *Baudhayana Sulba Sutra*, the dates of which are given variously as between the 8th century BC and the 2nd century BC, in India, contains a list of Pythagorean triples discovered algebraically, a statement of the Pythagorean theorem, and a geometrical proof of the Pythagorean theorem for an isosceles right triangle.

The *Apastamba Sulba Sutra* (circa 600 BC) contains a numerical proof of the general Pythagorean theorem, using an area computation. Van der Waerden believes that "it was certainly based on earlier traditions". According to Albert Bŭrk, this is the original proof of the theorem; he further theorizes that Pythagoras visited Arakonam, India, and copied it.

Pythagoras, whose dates are commonly given as 569–475 BC, used algebraic methods to construct Pythagorean triples, according to Proklos's commentary on Euclid. Proklos, however, wrote between 410 and 485 AD. According to Sir Thomas L. Heath, there is no attribution of the theorem to Pythagoras for five centuries after Pythagoras lived. However, when authors such as Plutarch and Cicero attributed the theorem to Pythagoras, they did so in a way which suggests that the attribution was widely known and undoubted.

Around 400 BC, according to Proklos, Plato gave a method for finding Pythagorean triples that combined algebra and geometry. Circa 300 BC, in Euclid's *Elements*, the oldest extant axiomatic proof of the theorem is presented.

Written sometime between 500 BC and 200 AD, the Chinese text *Chou Pei Suan Ching* (周髀算经), (*The Arithmetical Classic of the Gnomon and the Circular Paths of Heaven*) gives a visual proof of the Pythagorean theorem — in China it is called the "Gougu Theorem" (勾股定理) — for the (3, 4, 5) triangle. During the Han Dynasty, from 202 BC to 220 AD, Pythagorean triples appear in *The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art*, together with a mention of right triangles.

The first recorded use is in China, known as the "Gougu theorem" (勾股定理) and in India known as the Bhaskara Theorem.

There is much debate on whether the Pythagorean theorem was discovered once or many times. Boyer (1991) thinks the elements found in the Shulba Sutras may be of Mesopotamian derivation.

## ProofsEdit

This is a theorem that may have more known proofs than any other; the book *Pythagorean Proposition*, by Elisha Scott Loomis, contains 367 proofs.

### Proof using similar trianglesEdit

Like most of the proofs of the Pythagorean theorem, this one is based on the proportionality of the sides of two similar triangles.

Let *ABC* represent a right triangle, with the right angle located at *C*, as shown on the figure. We draw the altitude from point *C*, and call *H* its intersection with the side *AB*. The new triangle *ACH* is similar to our triangle *ABC*, because they both have a right angle (by definition of the altitude), and they share the angle at *A*, meaning that the third angle will be the same in both triangles as well. By a similar reasoning, the triangle CBH is also similar to *ABC*. The similarities lead to the two ratios..: As

so

These can be written as

Summing these two equalities, we obtain

In other words, the Pythagorean theorem:

### Euclid's proofEdit

In Euclid's *Elements*, Proposition 47 of Book 1, the Pythagorean theorem is proved by an argument along the following lines. Let *A*, *B*, *C* be the vertices of a right triangle, with a right angle at *A*. Drop a perpendicular from *A* to the side opposite the hypotenuse in the square on the hypotenuse. That line divides the square on the hypotenuse into two rectangles, each having the same area as one of the two squares on the legs.

For the formal proof, we require four elementary lemmata:

- If two triangles have two sides of the one equal to two sides of the other, each to each, and the angles included by those sides equal, then the triangles are congruent. (Side - Angle - Side Theorem)
- The area of a triangle is half the area of any parallelogram on the same base and having the same altitude.
- The area of any square is equal to the product of two of its sides.
- The area of any rectangle is equal to the product of two adjacent sides (follows from Lemma 3).

The intuitive idea behind this proof, which can make it easier to follow, is that the top squares are morphed into parallelograms with the same size, then turned and morphed into the left and right rectangles in the lower square, again at constant area.

The proof is as follows:

- Let ACB be a right-angled triangle with right angle CAB.
- On each of the sides BC, AB, and CA, squares are drawn, CBDE, BAGF, and ACIH, in that order.
- From A, draw a line parallel to BD and CE. It will perpendicularly intersect BC and DE at K and L, respectively.
- Join CF and AD, to form the triangles BCF and BDA.

- Angles CAB and BAG are both right angles; therefore C, A, and G are collinear. Similarly for B, A, and H.
- Angles CBD and FBA are both right angles; therefore angle ABD equals angle FBC, since both are the sum of a right angle and angle ABC.
- Since AB and BD are equal to FB and BC, respectively, triangle ABD must be equal to triangle FBC.
- Since A is collinear with K and L, rectangle BDLK must be twice in area to triangle ABD.
- Since C is collinear with A and G, square BAGF must be twice in area to triangle FBC.
- Therefore rectangle BDLK must have the same area as square BAGF = AB
^{2}. - Similarly, it can be shown that rectangle CKLE must have the same area as square ACIH = AC
^{2}. - Adding these two results, AB
^{2}+ AC^{2}= BD × BK + KL × KC - Since BD = KL, BD* BK + KL × KC = BD(BK + KC) = BD × BC
- Therefore AB
^{2}+ AC^{2}= BC^{2}, since CBDE is a square.

This proof appears in Euclid's *Elements* as that of Proposition 1.47.

### Garfield's proofEdit

James A. Garfield (later President of the United States) is credited with a novel algebraic proof[1] using a trapezoid containing two examples of the triangle, the figure comprising one half of the figure using four triangles enclosing a square shown below.

### Similarity proofEdit

From the same diagram as that in Euclid's proof above, we can see three similar figures, each being "a square with a triangle on top". Since the large triangle is made of the two smaller triangles, its area is the sum of areas of the two smaller ones. By similarity, the three squares are in the same proportions relative to each other as the three triangles, and so likewise the area of the large square is the sum of the areas of the two smaller squares.

### Proof by rearrangementEdit

A proof by rearrangement is given by the illustration and the animation. In the illustration, the area of each large square is (*a* + *b*)^{2}. In both, the area of four identical triangles is removed. The remaining areas, *a*^{2} + *b*^{2} and *c*^{2}, are equal. Q.E.D.

This proof is indeed very simple, but it is not *elementary*, in the sense that it does not depend solely upon the most basic axioms and theorems of Euclidean geometry. In particular, while it is quite easy to give a formula for area of triangles and squares, it is not as easy to prove that the area of a square is the sum of areas of its pieces. In fact, proving the necessary properties is harder than proving the Pythagorean theorem itself and Banach-Tarski paradox. Actually, this difficulty affects all simple Euclidean proofs involving area; for instance, deriving the area of a right triangle involves the assumption that it is half the area of a rectangle with the same height and base. For this reason, axiomatic introductions to geometry usually employ another proof based on the similarity of triangles (see above).

A third graphic illustration of the Pythagorean theorem (in yellow and blue to the right) fits parts of the sides' squares into the hypotenuse's square. A related proof would show that the repositioned parts are identical with the originals and, since the sum of equals are equal, that the corresponding areas are equal. To show that a square is the result one must show that the length of the new sides equals *c*. Note that for this proof to work, one must provide a way to handle cutting the small square in more and more slices as the corresponding side gets smaller and smaller.^{[1]}

### Algebraic proofEdit

An algebraic variant of this proof is provided by the following reasoning. Looking at the illustration which is a large square with identical right triangles in its corners, the area of each of these four triangles is given by an angle corresponding with the side of length *C*.

The *A*-side angle and *B*-side angle of each of these triangles are complementary angles, so each of the angles of the blue area in the middle is a right angle, making this area a square with side length *C*. The area of this square is *C*^{2}. Thus the area of everything together is given by:

However, as the large square has sides of length *A* + *B*, we can also calculate its area as (*A* + *B*)^{2}, which expands to *A*^{2} + *2AB* + *B*^{2}.

- (Distribution of the 4)
- (Subtraction of 2
*AB*)

### Proof by differential equationsEdit

One can arrive at the Pythagorean theorem by studying how changes in a side produce a change in the hypotenuse in the following diagram and employing a little calculus.

As a result of a change in side *a*,

by similar triangles and for differential changes. So

upon separation of variables.

which results from adding a second term for changes in side *b*.

Integrating gives

When *a* = 0 then *c* = *b*, so the "constant" is *b*^{2}. So

As can be seen, the squares are due to the particular proportion between the changes and the sides while the sum is a result of the independent contributions of the changes in the sides which is not evident from the geometric proofs. From the proportion given it can be shown that the changes in the sides are inversely proportional to the sides. The differential equation suggests that the theorem is due to relative changes and its derivation is nearly equivalent to computing a line integral.

These quantities *da* and *dc* are respectively infinitely small changes in *a* and *c*. But we use instead real numbers Δ*a* and Δ*c*, then the limit of their ratio as their sizes approach zero is *da*/*dc*, the derivative, and also approaches *c*/*a*, the ratio of lengths of sides of triangles, and the differential equation results.

## ConverseEdit

The converse of the theorem is also true:

For any three positive numbers

a,b, andcsuch thata^{2}+b^{2}=c^{2}, there exists a triangle with sidesa,bandc, and every such triangle has a right angle between the sides of lengthsaandb.

This converse also appears in Euclid's *Elements*. It can be proven using the law of cosines, or by the following proof:

Let *ABC* be a triangle with side lengths *a*, *b*, and *c*, with *a*^{2} + *b*^{2} = *c*^{2}. We need to prove that the angle between the *a* and *b* sides is a right angle. We construct another triangle with a right angle between sides of lengths *a* and *b*. By the Pythagorean theorem, it follows that the hypotenuse of this triangle also has length *c*. Since both triangles have the same side lengths *a*, *b* and *c*, they are congruent, and so they must have the same angles. Therefore, the angle between the side of lengths *a* and *b* in our original triangle is a right angle.

A corollary of the Pythagorean theorem's converse is a simple means of determining whether a triangle is right, obtuse, or acute, as follows. Where *c* is chosen to be the longest of the three sides:

- If
*a*^{2}+*b*^{2}=*c*^{2}, then the triangle is right. - If
*a*^{2}+*b*^{2}>*c*^{2}, then the triangle is acute. - If
*a*^{2}+*b*^{2}<*c*^{2}, then the triangle is obtuse.

## Consequences and uses of the theoremEdit

### Pythagorean triplesEdit

A Pythagorean triple has 3 positive numbers *a*, *b*, and *c*, such that . In other words, a Pythagorean triple represents the lengths of the sides of a right triangle where all three sides have integer lengths. Evidence from megalithic monuments on the Northern Europe shows that such triples were known before the discovery of writing. Such a triple is commonly written (*a*, *b*, *c*). Some well-known examples are (3, 4, 5) and (5, 12, 13).

### List of primitive Pythagorean triples up to 100Edit

(3, 4, 5), (5, 12, 13), (7, 24, 25), (8, 15, 17), (9, 40, 41), (11, 60, 61), (12, 35, 37), (13, 84, 85), (16, 63, 65), (20, 21, 29), (28, 45, 53), (33, 56, 65), (36, 77, 85), (39, 80, 89), (48, 55, 73), (65, 72, 97)

### The existence of irrational numbersEdit

One of the consequences of the Pythagorean theorem is that irrational numbers, such as the square root of 2, can be constructed. A right triangle with legs both equal to one unit has hypotenuse length square root of 2. The Pythagoreans proved that the square root of 2 is irrational, and this proof has come down to us even though it flew in the face of their cherished belief that everything was rational. According to the legend, Hippasus, who first proved the irrationality of the square root of two, was drowned at sea as a consequence.

### Distance in Cartesian coordinatesEdit

The distance formula in Cartesian coordinates is derived from the Pythagorean theorem. If (*x*_{0}, *y*_{0}) and (*x*_{1}, *y*_{1}) are points in the plane, then the distance between them, also called the Euclidean distance, is given by

More generally, in Euclidean *n*-space, the Euclidean distance between two points, and , is defined, using the Pythagorean theorem, as:

## ReferencesEdit

- ↑ Pythagorean Theorem: Subtle Dangers of Visual Proof by Alexander Bogomolny, retrieved 19 December 2006.